Preview

Why Is Hammurabi's Laws Cruel

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Hammurabi's Laws Cruel
In my opinion most of the laws were cruel. I think King Hammurabi's laws was not to protect the people fairly. I think this because it seem like the higher rank people are more important. Like this one law, "If someone strikes a man of higher rank, than he shall be whipped 60 times in public." It clearly show that the punishment are base on the people social status. Also most of the punishment is either death or lost of limbs. Modern day laws are more broken down to what type of crime you did. Most of the punishment is either jail or to pay a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Babylon, the dynasty of Ur fell to the Elamites and Hammurabi became the most powerful king of Babylon which conquered large portions of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi is known for his law code, his stele that presents the law code and other orders. There is a system of crime and punishments outlined on his law code, as well as a representation of Hammurabi. If you look closely at the stele, it shows that Hammurabi has a close connection with Shamash, the sun god (Hammurabi on the left and Shamash on the right.) and below the figures, is where the law code is located, which tells us what the crime and punishment would be. For example: an eye for an eye and there are also crimes for adultery. The laws are written in…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Between 1792-1750 BC the Babylonians lived in Mesopotamia. They were part of a group called the Semites. Hammurabi, who was the sixth Babylonian king, united the Semites under one code of laws. Hammurabi established laws that would be implemented throughout his kingdom. The “Code of Hammurabi” is the first recorded laws in history. The code provided laws and punishments that were based on social status and…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that Hammurabi´s code is too harsh. The reason I think this is because why should a builder die because they built a weak house and the person inside died,why should someone lose their hands for stealing, should a slave's ear get…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi lived nearly 4,000 years ago and was ruler of a kingdom called Babylonia for 42 years. When he was in power, he ruled over approximately 1,000,000 people. When Hammurabi took power in 1792 B.C.E. he was king of most of Mesopotamia, the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. In his 38th year of power, Hammurabi was instructed by the “god” of justice, Shamash, to have a Code of Law carved on a stone stele, (a large pillar-like stone). Hammurabi had 282 laws (BGE), but the real question is, were they just? No, these laws were not just, because of the family, property, and personal injury laws.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The code was very harsh, a person in this society could be put to death for almost anything. “Any one steal cattle or sheep, or an ass, or a pig or a goat, if it belong to a god or to the court, the thief shall pay thirtyfold therefor; if they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold; if the thief has nothing with which to pay he shall be put to death” (Hammurabi Code). This is a good example of the punishments being different depending on the social class. The poor people who may need the cattle get the worst treatment if you have money or steal from someone who doesn't have money the punishment is not that severe. This punishment system today would be equivalent to us letting prisoners free if they could afford it which makes the different punishments for each social class very…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi’s Code was unfair to the victim. This is shown in Laws 48, 209, and 213. For instance, in Law 48 it says that “If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and storm has flooded his field or carried away the crop,…in that year he does not have to pay his creditor.”(Doc D). In Law 48 it is unfair to the creditor because he got cheated because he never got his money back. How would you liked to have loaned someone your good money and have never gotten it back? Or in Law 209 and 213 when if a man hits a free girl and causes her to lose her child, he has to pay her 10 shekels of silver, whereas if you were a slave you would only get 2 shekels of silver!(Doc E). If you were that slave girl would you be satisfied? I wouldn’t! A…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Was Hammurabi Unjust

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi had 282 laws many with extremely harsh punishments like death. Hammurabi was the ruler of Babylon for 42 years and was thought to have gotten his laws from the god of justice Shamash. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was unjust because of the family law, property law, and the personal injury law. First of all, it is unjust because of the family laws. Law 148 states that if a man's wife wife is severely ill the man can remarry but he cannot divorce the ill wife and still has to take care of her.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law have many differences and many similarities. They both have laws on marriage, farming, religion, equality, and many other things. Both of these codes of law showed that each civilization had order and some form of government. It also showed how two civilizations, that are so far apart, can still think so alike and that humanity learns from it's mistakes by improving on them. Hammurabi had a nice view on how to keep things equal. He has the basic concept of “eye for an eye.” The Hebrew law also has this same concept because in one of it's laws, it says, “if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake..” (Exodus 21:28, KJV) This shows that both the Hebrews and Hammurabi's people, the Babylonians, had a sense of equality in social class and other things. There is a Hebrew law that if an ox gores a man or woman and kills him, and the owner knows about this and does nothing, then the ox and the owner will be put to death. This differs slightly from Hammurabi's Code because it does not say that the owner has to be put to death. It says that the owner shall pay ½ a mina of silver. This shows how the two different codes of laws and two different civilizations can still have similar concepts but have different ways to interpret them. But, most of these laws only applied to the situation or geography of the land at the time. There is many differences and similarities in both of these codes of law and almost impossible to conclude whether these are more similar or more different. It really all depends on opinion. These are examples on how Hammurabi's Code of Law and the Hebrew Law are alike or…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Justice

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ancient Mesopotamia’s hierarchical social structure provides the setting for the Code of Hammurabi. The Amorite King, Hammurabi, ruled Mesopotamia for more than 40 years, originally over a 50-mile radius of Babylon; however, toward the latter part of his reign, he extended his rule toward Assyria and northern Syria. In an effort to unify these multifaceted societies, he published the Code of Hammurabi laws. His effort was a noble one – to end wickedness and end oppression of the weak; therefore, he proclaimed he held a divine commission “to rise like the sun over the black-headed people, and to light up the land. “ Though Hammurabi’s code covered a plethora of concerns and penalties regarding people, palaces, and property,…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Essay

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong” (Theodore Roosevelt). To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him. Some things we know about Hammurabi is that he was a king for 42 years! In addition to that he was a king of a city-state in Mesopotamia called Babylon. Something else about Hammurabi is that he took power in 1792 BCE. Hammurabi also developed a code consisting of an astonishing 282 laws. My paper will answer the question, “Was Hammurabi’s Code fair?” There are three areas of law in Hammurabi’s Code which can be proven to be just. These three areas of law are family law, personal injury law, and property law.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First of all; Hammurabi was a Mesopotamian king who recorded a system of laws called the Code of Hammurabi. Code of Hammurabi is a set of 282 rules and penalties devised by the Babylonian King, Hammurabi. King Hammurabi ruled Babylon, placed along the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers, from 1792–1750 BCE. During his time as king he oversaw a great expansion of his kingdom from a city-state to an empire. He was concerned about keeping order in his kingdom but that wasn't the only cause for amassing the list of laws. As he conquered other cities and his kingdom grew, he saw the need to unify the groups he controlled. To accomplish this goal, he needed one universal set of laws for all the people he conquered the Hammurabi Code.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Rule

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Babylon life was probably hard for the people because they didn’t have as much resources as we do today. The people of Babylon had very strict rules and this was what made it hard the people had too build good houses and make good houses and had too be very careful. It was also hard because Hammurabi’s religion was huge and they all had too follow his beliefs. So they couldn't believe in something different or they would die. In Source C it says if a man breaks another's man's bone his own shall be broke. I think that this is a bad rule what if one man slips bumps into another man and the man falls and breaks his are. Im saying that this rule is not fair. In the document it also says that If any one strike the body of a man higher in rank…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Hierarchy

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi, who had begun ruling the Babylonian Empire in 1800 BC. Hammurabi used his military leadership skills to conquer many smaller city-states. He believed that the Gods chose him to bring justice and order to his people. Shortly after Hammurabi’s rise in power he created his code of laws known as “The Code of Hammurabi”, which were written to upheld honesty, protect property rights, maintain social hierarchy and define all relationships and aspects of life. The laws were publicly displayed so that everyone would have the equal opportunity to understand and study them. The laws were expected to be followed by everyone. The punishment for breaking the laws were very severe, however they aided in the compliance of the citizens of the Mesopotamian society.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although Hammurabi’s code could be seen as just, but some ideas he has are thought out incorrectly. Overall Hammurabi’s laws can’t be said as righteous in every way, since they god of unjust must of work with the god of…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Hammurabi Wrong

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code was harsh and quick in order to serve as a deterrent. The code’s harshness made people see what would happen to them if they broke the law. His code stopped people from breaking the law, so it protected the weak from the strong. The U.S does not have a harsh and quick system. In fact, it is very slow and does not have many major punishments. Many laws are broken in the U.S because our laws do not serve as a deterrent. If Hammurabi visited the U.S today I think he would not be pleased and he would not feel that his ideal was not being met. Hammurabi wanted to protect the weak from the strong, but the system of laws the United States has does not execute this. People rob, hurt, and even kill people on a day to day basis! Hammurabi…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays