Preview

Why Is Eyewitness Testimony Unreliable

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Eyewitness Testimony Unreliable
When investigating a crime that has occurred, law enforcement officers in Delafield, and throughout Wisconsin, often look for eyewitnesses. The statements of people who saw a crime have long been viewed as some of the most accurate sources of proof. Judges and juries are quick to believe the testimony of people who claim to have seen first hand what happened, and who was involved. Research shows, however, that the testimony of eyewitnesses is not always as dependable as it seems.

Often, eyewitnesses misremember events and misidentify people. This has resulted in the wrongful convictions of many innocent people. Scientific American reports that 239 convictions have been overturned since the introduction of DNA evidence in the 1990s. Eyewitness testimony contributed to 73 percent of the
…show more content…
There is a common misconception that the human mind works much like a video recorder. People believe that memories are recorded and can be played back and recalled exactly as they happened. However, that is not the case. In fact, there is much subjectivity in how people remember events that occurred. As such, there are numerous factors, which may impact the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness testimony. In general, these factors are separated into two categories – estimator variables and system variables.

Estimator variables

Estimator variables are factors that can impact a person’s ability to observe and recollect events. These variables cannot, however, be controlled by the criminal justice system, according to the American Bar Association. Some of the most common estimator variables include the following:

• The age of the witness
• The lighting in the area where the crime occurred
• The distance between the witness and the crime’s perpetrator
• The length of time that the witness had to view the perpetrator of the crime
• The level of the witness’ intoxication
• If the witness is of a different race than the crime’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Past research on human memory revealing that events and details of events were mistakenly recorded and stored in people’s minds. Some of the subjects falsely remembered seeing images that were not there during a certain incident. When words were injected into certain questions, the subjects also incorrectly provided accounts of what they saw. These findings indicate that eyewitness testimony may not be accurate sometimes.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cotton Case Analysis

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Ronald Cotton case estimator variables, such as, the witness being frightened or possibly fixated on the fact a knife was being wielded against her during the assault could have helped play a…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yerkes Dodson law – states that there is an optimum level of anxiety for accurate eyewitness testimony. I.e. People who are not at all stressed, and people who are very stressed will be less accurate eyewitnesses that those who are under a moderate amount of stress.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this court case, the eyewitness identification of the truck was vital to the initial traffic stop of the vehicle. The 911 caller’s identification of the vehicle played a key role in the court as it served as evidence against the petitioners, so if the caller’s description of the vehicle was not accurate, the right truck would not have been found or the case could be dropped. In a study performed by Neil Brewer and Gary L. Wells, they identified several variables that impact the witness’s accuracy and instill a bias against the suspect. Some of these variables include cross-racial identification and poor lighting (Brewer & Wells, 2011). The cross-racial bias is when someone of one race is able to more easily identify another member of their own race, and their ability to identify someone of another race is impaired (Rutledge, 2016). In an effort to decrease the prevalence of the cross-racial bias, psychologists have recommended the use of double-blind lineups to hopefully discourage the administrator of the lineup from involuntarily indicating the witness to the suspect. Some prime routes to consider when trying to advance in the accuracy of eyewitness identification are decreasing the certainty of variables to explain the identification performance, and the inadequacy of scrutinizing interactions…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The forensic technique eyewitnesses is a term meaning a person who has witnesses an event that is important to a criminal investigation or criminal justice trial. The eyewitness will at first tell a police officer what he or she have witnessed, but after telling the police officer the eyewitness may be required to do other things to help the investigation or trial as well. Nowadays the most normal thing a eyewitness will do is to point a person out in a line-up, but a eyewitness can also be required to witness at court and tell their story about what he or she witnessed. (http://www.simplypsychology.org/eyewitness-testimony.html). Eyewitnesses has always been used to help investigations and in the criminal justice system.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am completely appalled by the fact that we are still giving so much credit to the accounts of eyewitnesses. As we have learned in our studies, our memories easily become contaminated by things like, post-event misinformation, retroactive interference, errors in source monitoring, not to mention things like the stress of the event, which can also influence our memories (Matlin, 2012). If fact the act of recalling an event is more like trying to put together a puzzle with missing pieces, than simple reviewing a video. And when we take into account that “eyewitness misidentification is the greatest contributing factor to wrongful convictions proven by DNA testing, playing a role in more than 70% of convictions overturned through DNA testing…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Memory and Eyewitness Testimony are two concepts which are studied within the topic of cognitive psychology. It is important to investigate these processes to aid in the understanding of how individuals cognitively process ideas and how this may affect specific behaviors. From a psychological perspective, memory can be defined as, “The capacity to retain and store information” (holah.co.uk, 2006). The further researches into the topic of memory allow it to greatly contribute toward societies' legal system, specifically in the sense of Eyewitness Testimony. Individuals may feel confident towards their memory abilities but according to many researchers, one's memory is not always reliable. (Bartlett, 1932) believed that memory is unreliable due…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a cognitive level of analysis child eyewitness testimonies can be reliable and credible because children are less suggestible to the formation of false memories according to the Fuzzy Trace Theory. Suggestibility is the degree to which encoding, storage and retrieval of information when reporting events is manipulated by internal or external factors (Bruck & Ceci, 1997). False memories are a recollection of an event that has not actually occurred. On the other hand child eyewitness testimonies can be unreliable and incredible because children may be more prone to the suggestive influences of leading questions when being interviewed to testify.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eye Witness Testimony

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Morgan et al. 2004. Retrieved 6-16-2013 from Wrightsmans Psychology and the legal system (chapter 5 pg. 117).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Safeguards Against Wrongful Conviction in Eyewitness Identification Cases: Insights from Empirical Research,” Andrew Smith and Lisa Dufraimont (2014) address how eyewitness identifications are vital factors in convicting suspects. However, some of those identifications are inaccurate or mistaken, and innocent people can be wrongly convicted. In fact, mistaken eyewitness identification is the main factor in wrongful convictions of the innocent (Smith and Dufraimont, 2014). Furthermore, eyewitness identifications are not the only factors to consider. Law enforcement personnel and lawyers can also “contribute to wrongful convictions” (Smith & Dufraimont, 2014 p. 200). As a result, precautions were established to prevent such…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eyewitness Identification

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Mistakes eyewitness identification has gone for 30 years now Identifying the innocent man up to life in prison, while the real perpetrator gets away like in U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Neil v. Bigger and Manson v. Brathwaite" (Criminal Evidence Thomas J. Gardner pg. 319)…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness testimony are accounts given by an individual about the details of an event that may include, what the perpetrator was wearing or physical description of the person , in what direction did the person run, details of a crime scene of a accident etc.., but can the eyes lie? Eyewitness testimony has been recognized as the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the U.S and because of this there are organizations in place such as the innocent project, which is committed to exonerating wrongly convicted people through the use of DNA testing and to reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice ().…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    eyewitness

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Fraser’s talking, I strongly agree his concern about the eyewitness identification testimony. I agree with Fraser that eyewitness testimonies are not reliable in some cases because “eyewitness testimony can be critiqued on several grounds, having impaired perception, having impaired memory, having inconsistent testimony, having bias or prejudice, and not having a reputation for telling the truth.” Even eyewitness testimony from honest people can sent innocent people in jail. Therefore, even if none of these characteristics apply, that does not mean that the testimony is credible. Human’s memory is partial complete and is always reconstructed. All our memories are reconstructed memories. They are the product of what we originally experienced and everything that’s happened afterwards.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eyewitness Misidentification alone is the greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in 72% of convictions. It’s unbelievable because research shows that memory is malleable and that an eye witness who is uncertain, can become much more certain over time. I also learned that when an eyewitness identifies a suspect it’s possible the police unconsciously provides information to them. Officers also try and use one suspect in multiple procedures with the eyewitness and that will increase the witness’s confidence to…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, can have steady impacts on someone who did not commit a crime being accused. For instance, within our adversarial process, the role of bias plays a big part in how the case is run. Whether it be deeply ingrained biases growing up, or just a prejudice that came about from growing up it has immense repercussions on wrongful convictions. Next, is a huge factor that affects many wrongful convictions cases. That would be eyewitness identification. Eyewitness identification has some good factors but also many bad factors. For instance, we looked into many studies on how sequential lineups can reduce false identifications of innocent suspects by reducing eyewitnesses’ reliance on relative judgment processes (Lindsay & Wells, 1985, p. 556). But also how people struggle to recall a certain person they have maybe seen in another situation. Another topic that’s become a growing topic is forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many aspects can go into the makings of forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many researchers like to study the quality control and training. The growing concern is whether bias and beliefs can greatly affect the outcome of an expert interpreting information like finger…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays