Preview

Why Is Eminent Domain Safe

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Eminent Domain Safe
Eminent domain is used widely used today to try and overtake other people's property. This occurs when the government will try to buy the land from you to be able to build their own buildings. In addition, this also occurs with states and cities trying to make people give up their homes so they can build buildings that are so called, "needed" for the city. Eminent domain has set standards, is fundamentally wrong, and makes people stand up.

First, the city has set standards of what is considered blighted and what allows them to be able to take someone's house. In the video, they stated, "If one's home isn't safe, no one's house is safe." By this quote, it shows that eminent domain is happening all over the United States. The city will
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chavez Ravine
    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Chavez Ravine

    Years ago, there was once a small town called Chaves Ravine within Los Angeles, California and this town was a poor rural community that was always full of life. Two hundred families, mostly Chicano families, were living here quite peacefully until the Housing Act of 1949 was passed. The Federal Housing Act of 1949 granted money to cities from the federal government to build public housing projects for the low income. Los Angeles was one of the first cities to receive the funds for project. Unfortunately, Chavez Ravine was one of the sites chosen for the housing project, so, to prepare for the construction work of the low-income apartments, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles had to convince the people of the ravine to leave, or forcibly oust them from their property. Since Chavez Ravine was to be used for public use, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles was able seize and buy Chavez Ravine from the property owners and evict whoever stayed behind with the help of Eminent Domain. The LA Housing Authority had told the inhabitants that low-income housing was to be built on the land, but, because of a sequence of events, the public housing project was never built there and instead Dodgers Stadium was built on Chavez Ravine. Although Chavez Ravine public housing project was the result of the goodwill and intent of the government, rather than helping the people Chavez Ravine with their promise of low-income housing, the project ended up destroying many…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kelelo V. City Of New London Case Summary
    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kelelo V. City Of New London Case Summary

    In the 2005 US Supreme Court decided on the case of Kelo vs City of New London. Inherent to the case was a challenge to the concept of “eminent domain” and its relation to the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution. The town of New London, CT, planned to develop an area of 90 acres, divided into 7 parcels, along the Thames River / Fort Trumball area in an effort to revitalize the town’s ailing economy. The project was projected to create in excess of 1,000 jobs, to increase tax and other revenues, and to revitalize an economically distressed city, including its downtown and waterfront areas1. Plans…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Eminent Domain
    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Case Study Eminent Domain

    He then noticed that on his front door a letter was posted communicating that the city authorities will be taking his property by eminent domain to create new businesses and jobs in the community. Not unlike the mountain property Martin is now facing another dilemma in which he is uninformed and reacting to an active developing issue. Therefore, I proceeded to explain that eminent domain or taking clause is a constitutional right granted by the Fifth Amendment that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Miceli,2015). Similarly, to Martin’s situation, I shared the Kelo v. New London case which was one of the most controversial cases concerning eminent domain, that precipitated protest across the U.S. Likewise, the facts from the Kelo’s case corresponds with Martin’s issue with the government seizing private property to sell to private developers, hence is where Kelo felt that New London was overstepping and violating the Fifth Amendment by selling the private property to a private developer instead of using it for public use (Kubasek et al.,2016). However, the decision ruled in favor of New London for the reason that, the city seizes the property to…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Atlantic Yards Project
    • 1248 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Atlantic Yards Project

    This sounds like a tremendous project that will drastically improve this neighborhood of Brooklyn and it is, for the most part. Unfortunately, very rarely is a something this big done without any controversies or opposition and here lies the moral and ethical issues that have been battled in court since day one and continue to do so. In order for Forest City Ratner Co. to obtain all of the desired 22 acres of land it needed the help of the New York City Public Authorities Control Board. The Public Authorities Control Board has the authority to use something called eminent domain, which allows them to acquire private property for the good of the public, even if the current owners do not wish to sell.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    BAMD 300 Study Guide Midterm 1
    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    BAMD 300 Study Guide Midterm 1

    New London Connecticut (Kilo)  involves Pfizer (a big drug company); wanted to set up a research facility and old lady’s house was the only thing in their way; went all the way to Supreme Court—trying to decide in case when can the Gov. come take your land and for what purpose. Is bringing in a commercial business a proper purpose for tearing down people’s homes? RULING: Can be done without justification as long as for public use. So they said that this was ok. Example of common law and determine what “public use” is and now have made ruling on it…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trail Of Tears Case Study
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    Trail Of Tears Case Study

    3. The Eminent Domain is the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. I think this can be a good thing for the…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Eminent Domain
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Eminent Domain

    Eminent Domain is the activity of the force of government to obtain private property important for the public utilization on the payment of reasonable compensation and taking after due procedure of law. Procedures to acquire property with regards to eminent domain are alluded to as judgment procedures. The property that administrations might censure incorporates charge title and additionally interests in genuine property, for example, easements, furthermore non-physical interests, for example, air rights.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Domain Infringes on Personal Property Rights: Damage to Securing Stable Growth in Sovereign Nations, while Bolstering Developing Nations
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Domain Infringes on Personal Property Rights: Damage to Securing Stable Growth in Sovereign Nations, while Bolstering Developing Nations

    In the Unites States the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution imposes limitations on the exercise of eminent domain. In a landmark eminent domain case that was presented to the US Supreme Court in 2005, the limitations have been greatly expanded giving the federal, state and local government the ability to take private land and then sell it to private developers. Eminent domain has always been a tool at the government’s disposal and was used to establish things like the transcontinental railroad. Eminent domain, as described by the Constitution, states that the government must use the land for public use. The public uses clause has been broadened over the years. The United States is not the only country that allows for eminent domain, although called different things the principals are the same. Countries such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, etc. all allow for land to be taken for “the greater good”. The laws and protections vary greatly. I plan to look at some of the benefits of Eminent Domain as well as the many downsides of eminent domain. I will explore several sovereign nations and how eminent domain has helped and hindered growth, private property rights, and the true cost of exercising eminent domain. I will also explore the use of eminent domain in developing countries, and contrast that to developing countries who have strict law pertaining to property rights.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Revere Hill Case Study
    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Revere Hill Case Study

    By placing in plastic red tiles, the City removes cultural property and replaces it with something that is completely out of context and as the BHAC’s lawsuit alleges, disrupts the community. The fact that cultural property would favor preservation over disability access shows a problem with thinking about decisions in terms of cultural property in that it largely eliminates thinking about other groups that are affected by the decision in terms of impact and use of the property as well as things surrounding the property. This is not a situation in which two or more groups claim the cultural property; it is a situation where the cultural property is given precedence over people. This does not look at the best interest of all people affected by the decision regarding property, but rather the preservation of the property itself, even if it comes at a cost to people makes it troubling to simply rely on this to make property decisions. Overall, looking at disability accessibility versus the preservation of cultural property does not yield easy answers and largely overlooks the need to use the property moving forward, which points to not looking at…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Chavez Ravine Research Paper
    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chavez Ravine Research Paper

    Have you ever been forced or bribed out of your own home? Did you ever feel so powerless? Many people in Los Angeles have felt that. When what I am about to tell you was explained to me, I thought it had happened in about 1910, but then I was astonished to hear that it was more recently, in the 1950’s.…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Positive And Negative Effects Of Eminent Domain
    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Positive And Negative Effects Of Eminent Domain

    The government’s use of Eminent Domain has both a positive and negative effect. The government has the ability to Eminent Domain for various reasons but generally it is with regard to public interest. In most cases this procedure is exercised for very good reasons or with the intention of good that would benefit the majority. In cases where there is a vast amount of benefactors it can be appreciated. Things like infrastructure, increase in workforce and other things that will bring revenue in an area are often much needed.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

    Eminent Domain is the power of government to take private property for “public use”, which is found in the 5th amendment of the Constitution. Eminent Domain has a positive and negative impact when it comes to society and an individual’s life. It has many positive impacts when it comes to the society, eminent domain may bring new schools, roads, and buildings. I do believe that eminent domain should not be used in the taking of private property for commercial use. I support the idea of eminent domain when it comes to the use of public use but oppose of the idea when it comes to uses such as shopping malls and office buildings.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Our Government Overlords By The US Supreme Court Case Analysis
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our Government Overlords By The US Supreme Court Case Analysis

    In an article by the U.S. News called “Our Government Overlords,” Antony Davies, an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University in Pittsburg, and James R. Harrigan, the CEO of FreedomTrust, argue that the government is exploiting the power of eminent domain, a clause that allows the government to take land if it’s going to better the entire community. They’re taking advantage of this clause by misleading the people that they’re property will be used to better the entire community, which in reality the government is actually giving them to corporations. As a result, the court case Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut and an incident with a Dallas Councilwoman served as an eye-opener to what the government is really doing to Americans…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Inverse Condemnation
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Inverse Condemnation

    For example, “the plaintiff's land is flooded when the building of a highway disturbs the drainage pattern” (Mandelker, 1966, para. 2). In addition, in the case of Northcutt v. State Road Department, the “Plaintiff's 40,000 dollar home in a quiet North Miami residential neighborhood was allegedly damaged by construction and operation of an interstate expressway and access road immediately adjacent to his property” (Honeywell, 1968, para. 1). Moreover, the owner of this prestigious home engaged in filing inverse condemnation to compensate the destruction to his home made in the process of the development of the community by eminent domain (Honeywell, 1968). In the previous two examples, the public enacted eminent domain that resulted in damages to the property of individuals that led…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Taking Clause
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taking Clause

    Within the United States government, private property can be taken from a private owner using eminent domain as long as the original landowner is just compensated and the property is used for projects that benefit the public. However, in many situations, property has been taken with the intention of benefiting communities economically, creation of new jobs and tax revenue, but alas projects have failed. By law the government, whether it be national, state, or local, must pay compensation to the private owner, the issue with this is that the owner only receives compensation of the value of the property, not time, effort, or the cost of relocation. The government should not be able to have the power to take property from private owners unless…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics