Preview

Why Is Dumping Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Dumping Wrong
Dumping is wrong, even if there is no law broken. I know this is a matter of opinion, however I believe dumping is immoral even if there is no way to objectively determine it. I guess it could be possible to argue that there is nothing wrong with dumping. Companies within the United States often sell their goods at prices that are below the cost of production. And at times if their products are outlawed and unable to be sold in the United States, I understand that they are trying to salvage some of their production costs by dumping them overseas. But when a product is dangerous, no one in any country should be put at risk.

Dumping is definitely wrong when products are dangerous to the public. Governments in poor countries do not have the ability

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although common sense will tell us that will the straight safety guidelines set forth by the US it would be unethical to export commodities banned in the US to foreign countries an egoist may tell you differently. Egoism tells us that if the action is good for me then it is in fact ethical, and can result in conclusions that most would agree to…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “High Tech Trash” by Chris Caroll, Caroll explains the effects of e-waste (electronic trash). The article mentioned how most electronics that are thrown out, donated to charity, or even recycled still end up in developing countries. “While some recyclers process the material with an eye toward minimizing pollution and health risk, many more sell it to brokers who ship it to the developing world, where environmental enforcement is weak” (Caroll 81). This causes our e-waste to affect other families around the world who worked who most likely worked in sweatshops to produce the products that are being sent back to them. When this should not be the case other countries should not have to pay with their wealth to take care of our…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Of Dumpster Diving

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over time, the unethical act of dumpster-diving has certainly evolved, where dumpster-divers are often out to steal personal information or data via disposed credit cards, receipts, documents, and even computer components and parts. As a result, organizations and business must take extreme precautions when disposing of any important information or materials, especially computer parts and components.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many communities, groups and people spend their time advocating how plastic bags damage the environment. For instance, Californians Against Waste, a non-profit organization founded in 1977, strives to prevent pollution and protect California’s environment many years. They sponsored and help complete almost all of California’s predominant recycling legislations. Recently, they have succeeded in contributing in exposing the plastic bag ban in public. They will keep on preventing plastic bags pollution, and they want to make sure the ban will be effective in California State. Not only do people stop producing plastic bags will impact the economy, the pollution they produce will also affect the economy. California Agasint Waste concludes that single-use plastic bags cost taxpayers money to clean up. They state that California spends around $34.2 million to $107 million every year to prevent people from littering plastic bags into the waters (“The Problem with Plastic Bags”). It is weird that people spend the money producing plastic bags to earn more; at the same time, they spend money again dealing with their disposal. Such huge amount of money can be invested into other fields to make society better, such as inventing new materials to decompose plastic bags faster. However, people are indifferent to the disastrous effect. Overall, there are hundreds of groups gather together to…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have targeted poor communities as areas they can dump their waste products. They particularly targeted areas that people of color live in, 3 out of 4 hazardous landfills are located in black communities according to a number of different studies. Both federal and state governments are complicit in these environmental atrocities. They offer tax break and corporate welfare to these companies that take…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sci 275

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many instances such as dumping are causing the water resource to be polluted by bacteria and other harmful…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cruelty done to animals in factory farming is wrong. I also believe that individuals who do not…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    its goods, but it does have a responsibility to the workers in those factories, to its customers and…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alang Final

    • 1803 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alang is selected as a case study because it is the most significant in the repertoire of environmental and human rights cases around the globe Shipping is arguably the largest mode of bulk distribution in the world. The disposal of hundred thousands of retired ships containing toxic materials takes place in environmental ‘sacrifice zones’ around the third-world, Alang being the largest with over 11000 ships every year (Source 5). In the 1990’s, it was estimated that Alang digested half the dilapidating ships of the decade. With it’s 40,000 migrant laborers and extremely low fixed costs…

    • 1803 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diseases or toxic chemicals are often able to get through. One of the biggest polluters, mining, also more seriously harms people of developing nations. Gathering conflict resources often involves illegal taxing by armed forces or extortion of resources. Armed forces sometimes even force people to work using murder, threats of death, rape, or amputation. Being an amputee is much harder in Africa because more of the work available is physical. Also, people in Africa tend to blame amputees rather than sympathetically donating more. There are fair trade and conflict free resources and many companies offer products made with said resources. Even without conflict resources many people live on less than 2 USD equivalent a day. There are many charities people could donate to provide assistance to the less fortunate. Some provide direct relief in the form of food or water. Others try to give a more long term solution such as building wells, water treatment facilities, or giving small loans to help kickstart income generation. Governments and organizations in developed nations also try to help poorer nations. All of these come at a cost of to the wealthy, however. The lost time, extra effort expended or…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Modern Modest Proposal

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The fix to this problem is quite simple really. I declare that for every airplane that ships materials and parts to our factories in foreign countries shall be shot down without question. Every cargo ship that sails to move foreign made products will be torpedoed to the very depths of the sea. The seas shall welcome them into the cold dark clutches that is as one’s greedy heart. Lastly, all foreign made cars registered in the U S of A shall be towed and thrown into a bonfire of reckoning. No mercy is to be taken by the ones who carry out these tasks for they are the very ones who have had their jobs ripped from them.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you were a manufacturer holding a substantial inventory of a product that has been outlawed in the United States, would you have any ethical concerns about selling the product in countries that do not prohibit its sale? Suppose the inventory write-down that you will be forced to take because of the regulatory obsolescence is material- nearly a 20 percent reduction in income will result. If you can sell the inventory in a foreign market, legally, there will be no write-down and no income reduction. A reduction of that magnitude would substantially lower share market price, which in i=turn would lead your large your large, institutional shareholders to demand explanations and possibly seek changes in your company’s board of directors. In short, the write-down would set off a wave of events that would change the structure and stability of your firm. Do you now feel justified in selling the product legally in another…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "How does the government help big industry get rid of millions of tons of toxic waste?…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    and might even harm the poor even more. In the middle East and India they had…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the only reasons people use labor trafficking to produce a product is because it is cheaper than hiring normal workers and paying them minimum wage. Because it is cheaper to make, people can sell the product for a lower price. The New York Time talks about how most of the American landmarks were able to be build because it was cheaper to buy the supplies from other countries. One of the many examples is the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, which connects the Staten Islands and Brooklyn. The steal need the build this bridge was cost America thirty four million dollars which is a lot cheaper than having the stead produced in the United States (Navarro). People are very careful with their money and want to get the most out of it. Another problem that will occur if the government stops purchasing from countries that labor trafficking is that the United States would have to start to make products on its own or find another place to trade with, but this is not a permanent thing. Once the other countries start doing something to stop forced labor them the United States government can start to purchase products from that country again. The country's are not doing anything to help these people so we shouldn’t be helping the…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays