Preview

Why Is Campaign Spending Problematic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Campaign Spending Problematic
Campaign related spending has increased dramatically over time. Even though the Supreme Court has ruled that campaign spending (not donations) by candidates and private individuals / groups is a form of free speech, some feel that there is just too much money in our election system. What do you think? Is campaign spending problematic? In what way(s) is it, or is it not, problematic exactly? Please explain your answer and provide evidence

Campaign spending whether in the presidential or in the congressional elections, have increased substantially. In order to have a successful campaign one needs adequate resources. These resources often come from interest groups funding campaigns. (These two previous sentences could be combined into one to
…show more content…
During the 2016 Presidential election, Hillary spent $1,1919 million and President Trump spent $646.8 million. These astonishingly high numbers have and will increase throughout the years, yet many candidates are able to raise and spend that amount of money. The fact is that the money raised does not come from voters or the average citizen. The funding comes for small interest group, business and corporations that invest and fund presidential and congressional elections. This is problematic because the small interest groups that donate and fund these campaigns are interested in supporting candidates that will return the favor and support them as they write legislation. For example John McCaine is greatly supported by the NRA and has reportedly received over $7,740,521 from the N.R.A(in text citation). N.R.A has funded directly to McCaine’s campaign and has spends on behalf of candidates from the N.R.A Political Action Commities and the Social Walfarem arm, which do not have to be disclosed to the public nor the federal government(in text citation). Support from a powerful interest group can partially explain senator McCaine’s view on gun regulation. McCaine has openly stated that he “recognizes the right of individual, law-abiding citizens to own and use firearms (in text citation).” He also takes pride in that fact that he “fought to shield gun manufactures from frivolous lawsuits (in text citation)”. Whether or not McCaine’s thoughts on gun regulation are true is not important. McCaine is supported and was elected through the help of an interest group, therefore his loyalty and responsibility is to them. His position on issues and bills should reflect the position and views of those who have directly supported him in his campaign. This shows that small interest groups and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 10 Study Guide

    • 2628 Words
    • 11 Pages

    independent expenditures- spending by political action committees, corporations, or labor unions that is done to help a party or candidate but is done independently of them…

    • 2628 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to enhancing her own credibility, this further allows her to show Republicans that her intentions are truly for the greater good of the nation. Furthermore, it creates the idea that the responsible gun owner – such as her husband, with whom she shares a very close link – would be open to discussing stricter legislation as a safety precaution, as opposed to the outright banning of firearms in the country. She states that while she completely respects the right to bear arms, she also urges Republican representatives and gun owners acknowledge the gravity of the situation, if they are to truly consider themselves “responsible”, law-abiding, and…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Party funding has been a controversial subject. On the one hand limitations to party funding would mean that parties would be constricted and possibly unable to spread campaign messages, but without limitation there is a danger of corruption through the promise of donation for political favours. For example, before the 2010 election, accountancy firms donated money to the conservative party in the hopes that in return they would be able to establish government contracts. Tony Blair was also involved with a scandal which suggested that he had taken a £1 million donation in return of exempting Formula one form the ban on the advertisement of tobacco. Despite there being legislation created by parliament to prevent these activities there has still been incidents of foul play.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, I believe there should be severe limits as to how leftover campaign finances are to be used based on the following: (1) to prevent fraudulent acts by deceitful politicians. (2) To build and maintain high ethical standard within the political realm and the politicians. (3) To gain trust of the public.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “After Scalise Shooting, a Twist: Lawmakers Want to Loosen Gun Laws” by Emily Cochrane demonstrates the politics of gun control. After the recent Scalise shooting at a baseball field, gun control laws have been put into the spotlight. A debate between lawmakers who want to loosen gun control laws and lawmakers who want to make them stricter. After the Conservative lawmakers were almost victims, they decided that they should be able to have a concealed weapon on them. Being shot at gave them a different perspective on gun control and felt that it should be less intense. They felt that no matter what, “the bad guys are always going to get guns” (Cochrane). Even today, there is still debate on how strict gun control laws should…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Senator Joe Manchin(D) along with Senator Pat Toomey(R) negotiated a proposed compromise to expand background checks in the wake of stalled gun control legislation. The article addresses Senates need for more votes in order to pass the expansion of background checks. It addresses tactics used by several gun control groups in an effort to sway votes and also touches upon the opinions of the NRA.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) changed the system of political campaign contributions in the United States. In the close 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that organizations are allowed to make unlimited political donations. The Justices reached their decision using the First Amendment, which pertains to free speech. To state it plainly, money equals speech. Surely, the Justices in favor of the decision assumed that the donor groups or individuals would be truly independent of the candidates. However, they were wrong. A few wealthy individuals took advantage of the ruling and began to rev up their political contributions through a complex web of organizations. Now politicians armed…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the rising mass murders across the country, many citizens are wondering if we need more gun control. Pro gun control advocates are saying it is necessary for three reasons of many: high capacity magazines, suicide rates, and active gun laws having loopholes. Anti-gun control advocates are saying it is not necessary because of the decrease in homicide, mental state of murderers, and the right to self defense. Citizens are not just taking sides too, so are presidential candidates. Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton is for pro- gun control, and Donald Trump, a Republican candidate, is for anti-gun control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In example, the special interest group NRA is a Republican influenced group that will spend millions of dollars in order to keep gun rights in the United States of America. The NRA feels so strongly on gun rights that they will spends any amount of money if a Democratic candidate implies that he/she will abolish all gun rights in the United States of America. In fact, many Democratic candidates dance around the question so NRA does not spend enormous amounts of money for the other candidate to win. More interest groups that are Republican based care more about their constitutional rights. In all, due to their rights on the line, Republicans are more willing to spend money in order for their preferred candidate to…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is said that the huge significance of money compromises America’s democracy. This is why spending limits have been introduced. In the aftermath of the crooked Watergate scandal, anxiety over campaign finance led to the passage of two major reform bills—the Revenue Act of 1971 and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974—that…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip” was published in the New York Times as a powerful rhetorical analysis that persuades the audience that gun control does not mean…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Campaign Funding

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    b. Before the 1970’s, congressional and presidential candidates were allowed to take unlimited sums of money from any one individual. This caused a growing fear that powerful, wealthy individuals could control the campaigns with their money and also that these individuals were getting something in return for their contributions.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think democracy is endangered by the need to raise huge amounts of money to run for public office? Is the need for big money leading to less democracy—that is, government by special interests? Would you support public financing of campaigns?…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Essay

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Bibliography: Brown, Peter H., and Daniel G. Abel. Outgunned: Up against the NRA: The First Complete Insider Account of the Battle over Gun Control. New York: Free, 2003. Print.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays