Preview

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
Animal Testing: Right or wrong?

A topic that has always been close to many people hearts is the one of animal testing. Some believe that it is right completely, some that it is right but only under certain circumstances and others that believe that all animal testing is wrong and will go to extraordinary lengths to stop it. There are many organisations that are against animal testing and that arrange protest marches and demonstrations against it. This is an important issue as there are so many different views and arguments for and against animal testing, and as these are animals lives at stake here.

For centuries, animals have been used in medical research. Since 1875, animal experimentation has been an on going debate on whether experiments
…show more content…
Every living system differs from each other. Predicting the reaction of one species by studying another species is not accurate at all. LaFoullette and Shanks depicted the truth that "even the most common drug given to humans does not have uniform effects in non-human animals". Although mice and rats look very similar, their reaction upon certain drugs can be totally distinctive. Roy Kupsinel, M.D. once announced that "animal experimentation produces a lot of misleading and confusing data which poses hazards to human health. For example, 4 million patients per year are hospitalised for side effects caused by thoroughly tested' drugs, and of those 50,000 die of the cures,' not the disease". According to Davis, "aspirin causes birth defects in rats and mice, poisons cats, but does not affect horses". A well-known example of the misleading animal testing which harms human health is the thalidomide disaster. The box accompanying the thalidomide stated that after substantial animal tests, this drug was confirmed to be safe. However, birth defects were eventually caused if pregnant women had

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cats, dogs, rabbits, mice and other animals, no different to those we have as pets, are used in experiments. Animals are force-fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, stokes, cancers and ultimately killed. Several cosmetic tests commonly performed on mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs include:skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed on shaved skin or dripped into the eyes without any pain relief.repeated force-feeding studies that last weeks or months, to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards.widely condemned “lethal dose” tests, where animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine what dose causes…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Cons

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (Alix Fano director of the Campaign for Responsible Transplantation and the author of Lethal Laws: Animal Testing, Human Health and Environmental Policy.) These findings conclude that Mice and Rats are not dependable subjects used for medical research. There are also alternatives for the unnecessary way of experimenting. Specifically, speaking of vitro testing. Vitro Testing is a way of conducting an experiment through a tube. This particular method for medical research has been beneficial to finding many cures for life threatening diseases. As a matter of fact, the cures today for AIDS disease were all discovered through vitro testing. According to the success of tube testing, animal experimentation is not essential to the medical research world. Not only does Vitro Testing open up a pathway of cures to diseases, it also save the many lives of innocent and loveable animals. Never again, will animal testing need to be a first priority in the name of science.(C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement)To wrap up the importance of not justifying the use of animals for the world of medical research, previous experiments with Mice and Rats have failed to show a link between cancer and smoking. This failure was one of many occurring with use of animals as experimental subjects. (C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement,) With great understanding of experimental failures, Alternatives, and the different doses of substances, animal testing the most unreliable and non essential method there is to medical…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition with no enforced laws, animals produce different results than humans. For instance, lead in w/transition “Even within the same species, similar disparities can be found among different sexes, breeds, age and weight ranges, and ethnic backgrounds” (“Results from Research…” n.pag.) The research people are doing will have an unlikely result in succeeding and or curing because they do not consider different characteristics of animals. Even with animals of the same species, there is no guarantee that all outcomes will be the same. Examine results show, “Animal studies are flawed by design. In addition to the fact that animals make poor surrogates for humans, the design of animal experiments is often inherently flawed, making it that much more unlikely that results obtained from such studies will be useful” (“Results from Research…”n.pag) The experiments we use on animals have no impact on human lives because even though animals have a similar body structure, they do not always correspond with the human anatomy. Scientists should put in more consideration with size, shape, skin, and different ways breeds function.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever wondered about the pain and suffering that animals go through for our selfish needs? The topic of animal testing has been debated (raged) since the seventeenth century (1600), but in the recent years this topic has been under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. Although animal testing has been beneficial, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being treated terribly for experiments that may have no point in the end. Is that what you would want to hear know your life could still be in danger?…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimated 26 million animals are used for animal testing each year in just the United States alone. Animal testing is when animals are used to test products, medical treatments, etc. to see if they would be safe to use on humans. Doing this can cause the animal's death in some cases. Animal testing is wrong because animals are not true counterparts of humans, there are alternative methods to animal testing that cost less, and it is cruel and inhumane.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The question is not, "Can they reason?" nor, "Can they talk?" but rather, "Can they suffer?"…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there may be similarities found between certain species of animals and humans, the similarities are just that: they are similar but they are not the same. In biology, science proves that the specimen containing the closest physical attributes of the human anatomy is a cat. Although cats are biologically similar to the human anatomy, primates are the most similar to humans in terms of behavior, conduct, and some physical attributes – such as the opposable thumb. Reviewing these simple scientific facts reveal that if animals are tested for human purposes, more than one specimen of animal needs to be tested in order to achieve a solution. Why? Animals are not the same as humans. Not only is the biology of animals contrastive to humans but also the conditions and environments that humans live in vice the environments and conditions animals are captive to for testing. Everyday, we humans dwell within our natural habitats; however, animals that are subject to testing do not. Ian Murnaghan, author of the article “Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons”, asserts, “…because animals are in an unnatural environment, they will be under stress. Therefore, they won’t react to the drug in the same way compared to their potential reaction in a natural environment. This argument further weakens the validity of animal experimentation.” The reaction of a drug in an…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing for research purposes has always been a debatable topic. There is no doubt that throughout the years, animals had helped develop new treatments for serious illness. However, everyone has a different perspective and feeling towards animals. A strong argument regarding animal testing is medical research and its potential benefits to the world. On the other hand, there are criticisms about the inhumane and cruel treatment animals undergo while experimentation. A critical review of both sides will be analyzed in order to take a personal position whether to advocate for animal testing or not.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year more than 25 million animals are used to develop new medicines and the majority of these animals are either euthanized or die from the experiments. This makes many people question our motives and moral principles. Should we continue to allow scientists to use animals for their research? Is research experiments really necessary? Is it alright for us to kill animals just so that we can benefit? The debate between supporting or opposing animal experimentation is difficult due to the success and failure we receive. But we can not deny the fact that animal experimentation is a very important factor that helps us advance in medical researches and technologies. They help us…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, drugs that pass animal testing are not necessarily safe, this shows that some drugs that being tested on animals is not safe. In the text, it says, “Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses” (5). This text shows, that some scientist use these products on these little animals such as mice, rats, and cats. Another text, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had the protective effect on the hearts of mice, vet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from marked” (5). This tells us that these animals are dying because of these products. Why can’t they test someone or something other than…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing doesn’t have a huge effect on the medical world, and sometimes can limit advancements and life saving drugs simply because they didn’t work on an animal that the drug was tested…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Research has been around for nearly 90 years and continues to show success as time moves along. For those who believe that history will repeat itself, they believe that animal testing has shown and will continue to show succes, but for those who believe in alternatives, they believe it should come to an end. Throughout this paper, I will argue the claims people make against animal testing.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue that is being discussed is whether people should promote animal testing. Certainly, animal testing can be successful sometimes in saving lives but I believe that it is more important to think about animals dying than people being saved because usually it is unsuccessful which basically results in animals dying for no good reason. In other words, I believe that animal testing should not be allowed because it results in poor test results, is cruel and inhumane, and may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has been around for thousands of years and seems to still be a very controversial issue still today. According to the Foundation of Biomedical research, it estimates that between seventeen and twenty-three millions of animals are involved in research (Do Animals Have Rights? 6). Research done on animals is frequently unreliable, misleading and contradictory. Animal testing and research ignites fierce debate. These animals are being used to find cures for diseases and to develop effective and safe drugs. According to Yolanda Brooks, thousands of different tests are done on animals and in biomedical research, animals are infected with human diseases so that scientists can monitor the course of certain illnesses (Do Animals Have Rights? 6). Animal testing is the last safety check before a new drug or device is tested on a human. (Animal Testing: Could It Ever Be Banned Completely? 1). Humans face a disadvantage if they are exposed to potentially dangerous, or even fatal, compounds. Although humans could potentially be seriously harmed from products, that does not make it okay to test those products on poor animals. The are more efficient alternatives instead of animals. They are a necessary part of the ecosystem and if there is no type of stance against the animal cruelty, we could possibly losing or making certain kinds of animals vanish from the world. Animal rights claim that it…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal experimentation has played a vital role in obtaining scientific research for both human and animal health. The involvement of animal models used in experiments for the benefits of humans, has triggered several debates and controversy concerning animal welfare, the reliability of the experiments, the effects on humans and many other topics (Cohan & Regan, 2001). Several of these tests have involved the experimentation for human drugs for specific illness and diseases. This essay will be focusing on whether the end justifies the means of experiments conducted on animals for the development of drugs for humans. There have been many discoveries developed through this process, although there are also many negative outcomes this method has encountered (Cohan & Regan, 2001). This essay will discuss the human benefits received and the negative impacts on both humans and animals. By analysing these three aspects, the evidence provided will evaluate whether the end does justify the means of this method.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays