Preview

Why Is Alexander The Great

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Alexander The Great
From the research I have done, Alexander “the great” was not that great of a ruler. I can support this textual evidence from a few documents we studied in history class. On the contrary I can see where some people might think that he was great, but all in all the not so great parts outweigh the great parts about him.

Let's begin with the fact that he sent his troops out to destroy every building in Athens. What kind of ruler does that? When I had first read this I started thinking okay this guy is going to be a control freak, have a democracy, and make the people suffer. To my surprise he actually let the people rebuild the city. Although that was a very kind action in his part he still should not have wrecked the city in the first place. The first document also shows that he put the cities fate into his own troops hands. Now if that doesn't show that someone wants power I guess that I don't know what does.
…show more content…
To me that is taking your power and over using it. Yes, he is the ruler of athens but he is far from a God or the God. The second document also states that he lied. He lied not only to himself, but to the people of Athens. Me personally, I am not gonna even respect a guy that lies to me, let alone honor him as a God.

Overall my opinion is that although they might have called him Alexander “the great.” He was not the great because of his decision making. This also goes to show that the decisions you make can really change your life, good or bad your life will depend on your decision

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He was known as one of the best legal advocates at the time in Athens. He gave over 200 speeches in court. At this time he found himself defending a husband who murdered his wife’s lover (PS25). The problem was that there was only one side of the story obviously because the prosecution was 6 feet under. This is interesting because there are many cases like this today in the present with the most recently the Trayvon Martin case, but this case is so relevant because at this time in Athens women didn’t have any right s other than when their husband would die they would have the right to his property, but ultimately that is it. This case is a little different though. In the court room he does admit to killing the man that slept with his wife, but he said the city was the actual person killing him. He then goes on by saying he had to do it because then people will hear it around the city and they will think twice about committing such a crime again their neighbor’s wife. He end the speech by saying that what he did was actally the law to follow. He is putting the blame on city asking why he might lose his property, life and everything else he has because of the law the city has in place. This is important because going on into history when leaders like Julius Caesar has a wife and a lover they can g back into time and see that if he is killed they could make the excuse that is was the city that made him do it. Obviously Caesar went out a little different way, but looking back was he guilty or not…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens is uniquely different from the other city-states in that the political system is original and portrayed as a system by the people. Pericles believes that the constitution of Athens “does not copy the laws of neighbouring states” but instead is “a pattern to others” (pg.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great wasn’t Alexander the fake. Alexander great was only 20 when he started to rule Macedonia(BGE). Around 336 B.C.E is when Alexander the great started to rule in place of his father Philip and rule Macedonia(BGE). When Alexander started to rule his main goal was to take down Persia and he succeed on doing that. Even though Alexander was able to take down Persia was he actually great? Alexander had great courage, leadership, and intelligence. These are shown by him being able to take out the strongest empire at the time, He was able to make one of the big empire and sustain it for 10 years after his death, and he was able to unify everyone he conquered with greece.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was great because he conquered a country in the years 333BC, 332BC, 331BC, 331BC, 330BC, 327BC, 324BC and 323BC. This demonstrates that he was great because he used tactics that would defeat enemies. An example of a tactic he used is phalanx. Phalanx means “a body of Macedonian infantry drawn up in close order with shields touching and long spears overlapping”. This was good because he could easily besiege cities which helped him take over the Mediterranean. My own research shows that Alexander the Great took power over the countries Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, northern Afghanistan and Iraq. This shows how Alexander the Great was so prodigious.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was a great leader even though some people commonly think that he was a sword wielding tyrant. Alexander was a great leader because he respected the beliefs of other people, had a great respect for knowledge, and he was a superior strategist in battle. He was so great that he was almost able to conquer the whole known world.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Alexander was arrogant and cocky. “Alexander believed himself to be Achilles’s descendant.” (Document A). Alexander also believed “...that he himself was a god.” (Background Essay). How incredibly arrogant and full of yourself do you have to be do have such incredibly high standards for yourself? How does that make him a “great” man? Someone who is known to be “great” normally wouldn’t have an ego the size of Texas. They are much more modest than…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great is a villain not, a hero. Alexander lied,cheated,frightened,and killed in his time of rule,if he did all of these things why is he called Alexander the Great? Alexander killed millions of innocent people he also made millions of people scared of him,“In 327 BCE, with the Persian Empire firmly under his control, Alexander turned his attention to India. He had some victories before reaching the Ganges river, which he intended to cross in order to conquer more of India”.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He proclaims, “In proof of this it may be noticed that the Lacedaemonians do not invade our country alone, but bring with them all their confederates.” (DWP, p. 58). But we see stark contrast to Pericles speech when the army of Athens arrives at Melians shores and orders them to surrender to Athens although Melians wanted to remain neutral and join neither the Spartans nor the Athenians. But the Athenian army simply dismisses the Melians request to remain independent and neutral and instead forcefully drives them out of their territory. This egotistical act of Athenians towards Melians obliterates Pericles claims of liberality. And even further the main argument that Athenians use in conquering Melians is in irony with Pericles speech which reads as such, “ And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do….” (DWP, p. 62). If Athens and Athenians were in fact just and fair, as Pericles claims then the latter part of the argument where they say, “and shall leave it to exist for ever after us” (DWP, p. 62) should have been done away with.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, Alexander the Great was a terrifying, barbaric villain who conquered many cities and changed many cultures so he could benefit by gaining more land, power and money. One reason I think he is a villain is the way he ruled people to obey him. For example after he conquered cities he sold 30,000 people into slavery and killed over 6,000 people to scare the people of Greece obey to him. He sold the slaves to the rich people so he can gain trust of the people.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Thucydides shows, while he did support Pericles, he didn't necessarily support democracy. The only way that democracy in Athens was successful was under Pericles, and when he passed away, the true nature of democracy was revealed. His successors followed self-serving policies, quarreled among each other, lacked foresight and in general destroyed themselves by internal strife. The people as a whole were too easily influenced and were too interested in personal advancement rather than the good of the state. Thucydides seemed to believe that the best form of government was one which placed authority in the hands of a few wise leaders who were able to overcome personal desires to pursue policy that benefited the state rather than the individual. In other words, Thucydides was in favor of a change to the Spartan…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think Alexander the Great should be remembered as a hero while others think Alexander the Great should be remembered as a villain. He should be remembered as a hero because of his heroic actions. For example, Alexander the Great conquered Persia, Egypt, and parts of the Asia Minor. He also created one form of government for his empire. Alexander was one of the bravest emperors in the Ancient World.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From studying the sources of the ancient world that talk about Alexander The Great, it is clear that many of them present Alexander as being some type of heroic figure or Demi-god. However you could question whether Alexander believed this himself. Only by studying his actions and the actions of those around him can we draw any type of conclusion on this matter. This can be done through the use of sources that exist from the time of and around his death. Most of these sources have been lost or are incomplete however, so I feel that it would be best to mainly consult the sources…

    • 3332 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays