Why Is Abolishing Net Neutrality Was A Bad Idea?
Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea
With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.
What is Net Neutrality?
Net neutrality regulates that all content on the internet is treated equally by all internet service providers (ISPs). This both prohibits the banning of any content or service and bars the slowing down of website traffic for particular websites.
The Rights of Internet Users
Net neutrality is vital if we care about preserving our rights in this ever-changing online culture. Jana Kasperkevic, in her essay “Net Neutrality: Explained,” gives a good analogy: “No net neutrality is like a taxicab refusing to take one customer but taking …show more content…
Oddly enough, the opposition argues that net neutrality will reduce investment in the industry. They usually refer to a study by former AT&T advisor, Hal Singer. His study suggested that net neutrality reduces investment from internet service providers. In actuality, this is not true. If we look at the facts, we see that net neutrality will actually spur investment in the internet sector. This is because net neutrality allows people to have an unadulterated view of the internet. This means that companies will be forced to fight harder to win over each potential customer. This will cause more competition, which, in turn, will help the
With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.
What is Net Neutrality?
Net neutrality regulates that all content on the internet is treated equally by all internet service providers (ISPs). This both prohibits the banning of any content or service and bars the slowing down of website traffic for particular websites.
The Rights of Internet Users
Net neutrality is vital if we care about preserving our rights in this ever-changing online culture. Jana Kasperkevic, in her essay “Net Neutrality: Explained,” gives a good analogy: “No net neutrality is like a taxicab refusing to take one customer but taking …show more content…
Oddly enough, the opposition argues that net neutrality will reduce investment in the industry. They usually refer to a study by former AT&T advisor, Hal Singer. His study suggested that net neutrality reduces investment from internet service providers. In actuality, this is not true. If we look at the facts, we see that net neutrality will actually spur investment in the internet sector. This is because net neutrality allows people to have an unadulterated view of the internet. This means that companies will be forced to fight harder to win over each potential customer. This will cause more competition, which, in turn, will help the