Preview

Why I Like Electoral College

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I Like Electoral College
I like the Electoral College. I don’t want a most popular vote win election because I want the smaller states to still have a say, but, if America switches to most popular election, the way things are, might just get worse. There are some good reasons for a most popular election, and there are not good reasons for one too. I like the Electoral College a lot, and I would like the voting system to keep it that way. However, our founding fathers created the Electoral College, to create a better way to elect a president that would not cause chaos or havoc in the country. I like how they give electoral votes to each state by their population. This way every state will be represented, by taking the majority of every state to choose what party …show more content…
This has happened in 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, and more recently this year (2016) presidential election, Donald Trump beats Hillary Clinton with 290 Electoral votes to 232 Electoral votes. While Hillary Clinton had 979,401 more popular votes than Trump. My second reason why I like the Electoral college is because when you look at the map of the states and most of them are red or blue and still don't win the popular vote even though most the states are voting red or blue. It doesn't make sense how one color can cover the map but sill looses. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. That is why I agree with the Electoral College. I think it is the best and fair way to run the election. The Electoral College has performed over 50 presidential elections. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College was established in 1787 as a compromise between having Congress select the next President of the United States, and having a direct democracy in which the popular vote selected the next President. The system has worked for over 200 years, so why change it now?…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, the Electoral College should go. I have three reasons why the Electoral College should be either get rid of. My reasons are that it focuses more on smaller states than big states, Hamilton had other intentions for the Electoral College, and the Electoral College was meant to be for small states so it would be more equal.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    11 – 24 – 2004 Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people argue that the Electoral College is an outdated system. After all, many things have changed in the last two centuries. For one, technology is much more advanced now than it was two hundred years ago. With the internet and television, we can now learn everything about a candidate regardless of where the come from in the nation. It is feasible to have direct election of a president because of these improved methods of communication and the evolution of technology in general.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In America, every four years there is a presidential election that gives everyday Americans the right to vote. The United States is a role model to other countries for giving the concept that all citizens should have equal say in the government and the way it is run. The Electoral College ruins the voting and creates an unfair system that is not equal. It destroys the fundamental part of democracy that gives everyone a fair right to vote. The Electoral College raises the question "Is the United States a Democracy?". With the Electoral College, it is a winner take all system which makes some voter feel that their vote is practically useless. The founding fathers believed that most people were uneducated and therefore make uninformed decisions…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College was established in Article II of the Constitution and amended by the 12th Amendment in 1804. Each state gets a number of electors equal to its number of members in the U.S. House of Representatives plus one for each of its two U.S. Senators creating a total of 538 electoral votes. A majority winner must receive 270 votes to be elected. With a few minor exceptions, the Electoral College gives all of the electoral votes for each state to the plurality winner in that state, regardless of the margin of victory. This "winner takes all" arrangement at the state level can elect a President who loses the popular vote, as was the case in 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000.(Kimberling) In the 2000 elections Gore received approximately 500,000 more of the popular vote than Bush winning in most major cities and urban counties. However, Bush received more votes throughout the rest of the nation winning more than three times the amount of counties than Gore. (Gregg)…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One very crucial reason there should be no Electoral College is that it violates political equality. “At base, it violates political equality, it’s not a neutral counting device; instead, it favors some citizens over others (George Edwards).” Not all…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although I believe the Electoral College needs many changes, it is necessary in order to have a successful government that is fair. Thee main argument against the Electoral College is that the presidency should be won by popular vote alone. It shouldn't be that one candidate could win the popular vote, but lose the election. At first I completely agreed with this, because we do live in a democracy, and I believe that a democracy is a government for the people by the people. This would mean that the mass population decides who is the president, not a hand picked group of men to vote on who they wish, because they do not always have to vote on the candidate in which the state has voted the majority on. Although the Electoral College may take away the presidency from the candidate that won the majority vote, it evens things out across the nation.…

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the paper

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion I agree with the Electoral voting, at first before I read more about how it works I did not agree. Now that I have read about it I believe it is really the only way that smaller states have any say in who the president is. Also I believe its a good idea to keep the candidates from…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Electoral College is an integral part of America’s political system. In 1787, the delegates of the Constitutional Convention decided on the creation of the Electoral College, or a system under which a body is elected with the expressed purpose of itself electing a higher body. The College was established by Article Two, Section One of the United States Constitution. (Lesson 2: Political Participation, n.d.) The Founding Fathers wished to provide the people of each state the ability every four years to choose the number of electors who would vote in the Electoral College, who would in turn determine which candidate would enter the White House as the nation’s next president. (Watts, 2010) For the past 200 years, the Electoral…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the Electoral College was established the electioneering system has received major criticism for its over-representation of small states. One could suggest more densely populated states such as California are at a disadvantage when one compares the voter population to Electoral College numbers. Compared to a small state such as Wyoming who receives an Electoral College vote for every 165,000 people, California’s ratio is somewhat marginally different, receiving an Electoral College for every 617,000 people. Therefore if California were to receive votes on the same basis as Wyoming it would not have 55 Electoral College votes but 205. So it may appear California is in some way representationally handicapped, at the expense of the Electoral College system.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Francisco Colin 4th Period There have been many talks about the Electoral College and how it should or should not be abolished when election time comes around. Many people feel that the electoral college is unfair because it seems that even if we vote it only comes down to the electoral college to see if they won presidency or re-election. Personally, I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished nationwide, so that way our voice can be “heard” or used more within the government. It should also be abolished because of the fact how in most of the elections, the Presidents are most and only elected because of the electoral college and our own vote, the vote that we had taken our own time to choose our future leader that will guide the country in the right path. Instead, the states choose who to vote just because the majority of the Electoral College is just one of the parties that dominate that state and not the other. For example, since the state of Texas is Republican dominated, what if the people had voted for the democratic side and the democratic won by the popular votes in the state of Texas, then it wouldn’t matter just because of how the state chooses who to vote because of the majority of the party in Texas. This to me is very outrageous because of how our forefathers from the past had fought for our right to vote, it is being put to waste since it only goes by the Electoral College and not our votes. For example, when Al Gore ran for his presidency the first time, we had the people, even though I wasn’t the age to vote at the moment, had chosen Al Gore to run this fine country of ours, even though the popular vote came close. He was the clear winner that the people had chosen to lead this country, but instead was cheated out of being President because of how George W. Bush had won the Electoral College by a small margin; he was instead elected to be the President to lead our nation. Because of this also, if feel that it is actually time for the…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays