Why Gun Control Won T End Mass Shootings Analysis

New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across. Tammy Bruce believes people should look at the underlying causes. Instead of just looking at how the gun laws are now and thinking about how they need to improve they should think about how you can’t control a person and what they do. I feel as if in Bruce’s
First, Bruce uses tone to emphasize her thoughts. “Tone is a general character or attitude of a place, piece of writing, situation, etc.” as said by Dictionary.com. The depressing tone used made her article more memorable leaving the readers with a grim sense of feeling making it successful. Next, Bruce used alliteration to make her writing more interesting. As said by Dictionary.com, “Alliteration is the occurring of the same sound.” In the article Bruce used the terms “mass-murder” and “new normal”. These terms made the piece stronger because they were used right and were strong terms. Lastly, she used some fallacies such as ad hominem. “An ad hominem is directed against a person rather than the position they were maintaining” (Dictionary.com). Bruce used this fallacy while attacking Hillary Clinton for her tweets. Using this kind of a fallacy was successful because it got Bruce’s point across. Without using these devices and fallacies Bruce’s article would not have been strong