Why Gun Control Should Not Be Banned

Better Essays
In America guns are huge deal whether you like them or not. It may be gun violence or just using it for sport, either way gun laws should be set but guns should not be banned. Having stricter gun control laws can keep Americans and their communities more safe, help guns from ending up in the wrong hands, and help reduce the overall deaths in America which are way up there compared to all the other causes of death. If people want their communities to be safe then there needs to be gun control to enforce these laws and for the people who are against this but they want the same thing as the people that are for it, open your eyes and look at what gun control really is. It helps protect communities all around the United States and it helps to protect …show more content…
Butterfield (2000) discusses President Clinton's proposal on gun control laws which is to go and get a license and register guns with background checks. Although it has been a battle for many years, he continued to fight for these laws to pass (p.1). His proposal was reasonable, in fact so reasonable I do not know why people would even vote against it. It would provide gun control as needed and it would not ban guns whatsoever, so both sides should be genuinely happy with the thought of gun control. There will continue to be a battle between gun control and no gun control, at least right now that is what it seems like. Butterfield (2000) Also said the president's proposal are what every gun buyer should undergo is a background check and pass a gun safety course in order to even obtain a license. this could be a way for them to help weed out the violent or mentally ill people that make cross that path (p.1). Which in this case America becoming more violent with guns would help us out a lot and definitely keep guns out of the wrong hands. Yes, I know that guns could be stolen by these people, but at least the government is not letting them buy guns on their own and physically be theirs and it is up to them if they steal or not, if so it's more charges on them. But that situation would be less likely to happen if you think about it. the main thing is the government is trying its best to keep …show more content…
a chance for a person to get killed by being shot is higher than natural diseases and even car wrecks these days. Butterfield (2000) said if they were to do the gun law proposal by Clinton, it could limit and help reduce gun crimes and accidental shootings and many different ways (p.1). if people were to look at both sides they will be able to see the pros and cons of everything and not be so biased. gun control would be a number one way to keep gun violence from occurring as much as it has been. anything to keep communities safe to live in and definitely less crimes would appear. LaFollette (2000) describe a way that we have a wide range to choose from what we believe in and does not have to be one or the other, one where you either are for abolition, new abolition or you are moderate, so between those who want to 4 bit access to some cell classes of guns to those who just want to completely ban guns and general. the second scale is for the restrictions of guns and goes the same way as the first scale does (p.1). what will fall it is basically saying is it does not have to be one or the other that you have to choose from, you can agree to disagree. For example you could want stricter gun laws but not want to ban guns completely or you could not want strict gun laws and not ban guns at all, it can be either or. so either way there will be gun violence here or there, that is just what happens in life

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    politicians want gun control to supposedly make the world safer. Even though some politicians may argue that gun control limits violence, gun control should be banned because guns in the hands of noble people give protection and drop crime rates. Gun control, as defined in the Merriam-Webster, is “laws that control how guns are sold and used and who can use them” (Webster). This means that this regulation on guns limits who can own a firearm and it tries to rule over throw a gun is used. Gun control…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Darby English 100 January 8, 2013 Why Guns Should Not Be Banned “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arm, shall not be infringed.” The United States constitution states it itself. It protects the rights of people to keep and bear arms. To ban guns will be violating the constitution. If a citizen in a state feels unsafe in their environment they have a right to own a gun for safety reasoning. If a state government…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why do people keep guns? These days many people own and carry guns with them in the name of security and protection. Many people own guns such as rifles and shotguns for the sport of hunting. The government allows people to own and carry guns by having a background check and getting a permit, but there are many private gun sellers who sell guns without any background checks and giving permits. The possession of guns should be strictly banned because they are the sign of violence, they have increased…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 9306 Words
    • 38 Pages

    1. Banning guns Owning a gun is legal in the USA. Actually, it’s the second amendment. The USA has the highest civilian gun ownership rate in the world. US civilians own about 270 million guns, compared to about 3 million guns owned by the military and less than 1 million guns owned by the police, also in the USA. In 2009, gun deaths actually outraced motor vehicle deaths in 10 US states. The 20% of gun owners possess 60% of all guns in the USA. Gun violence and gun control have been in the…

    • 9306 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    a shotgun? Gun rights and gun control are always hot items during any political discussion, whether it is between peers or politicians. One of the many great advantages to being an American is the ability to choose for one's own self what to believe in. Another advantage, in my opinion, is the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Laws should not restrict gun rights because first, it would infringe the second amendment, second, guns are a part of our culture, and finally, if guns were outlawed…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “You don’t need no gun control, you know what you need? We need some bullet control. Men, we need to control the bullets, that’s right. I think all bullets should cost five thousand dollars…,” said comedian Chris Rock according to GoodReads.com. Now when one of the most influential comedian and actor who everyone grew up knowing to love has a concern with gun control. You think to yourself how could someone so happy, energetic, and funny be worried about the bad things in life. Well our government…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A gun ban worked in australia but this isn't australia (Gun control… won't work, 2013). There are 300 million guns in america this is way more than the 600,000 guns bought back by the australian government for over $500 million. (Gun control… won't work, 2013). It is not realistic to expect a buy back of this magnitude to work and how would and will it be enforced. Gun control laws have also been very unpopular in the U.S. (Gun control… won't work, 2013). To try to push a ban in america today with…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    initial problem? 1a) I used an anecdote to make it more interesting. Also I said why this problem bothers me. 1b) My introduction should’ve been longer 2a) How do I provide cues that my purpose is to explore a problematic question rather than argue a thesis? b) How might the opening section of my draft be improved? 2a) I posted a question not a thesis. I didn’t show my beliefs I just showed the question. 2b) It should be a little longer Narrating the Exploration: 3a) Is the body of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    States that involves guns every year. People are using them for hunting, target shooting, self-defense, and they use it for murder. The number of times a murder happens each year by somebody using a gun is pretty big. Many people are wanting to have guns banned or have them only for self-defense. It is a big problem for people, because they are just out on the street or in a store and the next thing they would get shot and killed. I think that if guns were to be banned, they should just ban pistol and…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns Should Not Be Banned In The U.S. Firearms are weapons of destruction, annihilation, and carnage. However, a lot of people disagree and have very legitimate reasons why firearms should not be banned. There are several controversies that suggest banning the use or possession of firearms. Guns should not be banned. In contrast, guns can be weapons of destruction or a form of self-protection; depending on the user and the training of that particular person. Being trained by a firearms instructor…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays