Preview

Why Drilling Shouldn’t be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Drilling Shouldn’t be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Why Drilling Shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States offshore drilling debate is still ongoing, and the argument is that the United States benefits because it becomes less dependent on imported oil. There is also the argument that offshore drilling would affect military training and weapon testing. However, my argument is that offshore drilling poses a much greater threat to all civilization.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR, is a refuge geared toward preserving national wildlife in northeastern Alaska. ANWR is about 19 million acres, in space, and contains a potential drilling spot for oil and petroleum. The potential drilling spot is a small area known as the 10-02 Area. It is only 1.5 million acres, or 8%, of ANWR, would even be considered for development (What is ANWR). The controversy surrounding ANWR is whether to drill or not to drill into the 10-02 area. Some people want to preserve the wilderness and to find more fuel-efficient technologies. Others want to lower gas prices and to create more job opportunities. If the government decides to drill for oil, it could possibly lead to about 17 billion barrels of oil, to last the United States for the next 20 years.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Domestic Oil Drilling

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Utley, Jon B. "The Case for Increasing Domestic Oil Production." Reason Magazine. 3 Mar. 2011. Web. 06 Feb. 2012. <http://reason.com/archives/2011/03/30/the-case-for-increasing-domest>.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To Drill or Not to Drill

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that this is a very difficult question to have to answer. I can see where both sides are coming from because in one sense drilling off the coast and in the Gulf of Mexico would help save our country money because we would not have to buy our oil from other countries. I also think it is somewhat of a good idea because if we were to drill here instead of buying our oil from other countries it would help provide more jobs for Americans which we really need. I also believe that on the other hand it would be better to continue buying our oil from other countries because drilling off the coast here could easily cause water pollution and could kill our water animals. “People concerned about the environmental damage drilling can cause are outraged.”(Should We Drill, Scholastic News-Edition 5/6, 4/26/2010, vol. 78 Issue 22, p4-5, 2p)I would say if I had to pick a side I would have to say that we should continue to buy our oil from foreign countries because I feel like we have too much at stake if we drill ourselves. I think that after the BP oil spill and with the people that died and as bad as it polluted our water that we really should not take any chances. “Environmentalists criticize the administration for re-opening deep water drilling even though the technical problems that led to the gulf oil spill have not been fixed.”(Deep Water Oil Drilling: why Obama is okay with angering left and right, Mark Clayton, Christian Science Monitor, 1/26/2012, pN.PAG, 1p)If I had to pick some of the key habits that are hindering my decision on what side to take in this matter, they would be that if we drill on our own soil it could do a lot of damage to our waters and the animals that occupy them. I also believe that we should save our oil for when our earths oil supply is getting low because then we still have ours left to use when we need it. In order to overcome the habits that are hindering my decision I would have to be…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ANWR pro drilling essay

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The United States Congress should allow drilling in ANWR due to the economic, environmental, and social benefits we would get from doing so…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many reasons against fracking.To begin, fracking has scared and threatened the US. Another reason is, research shows that fracking is involved in air and drinking water pollution. Lastly, although fracking is bringing more oil to the US. All in all, fracking in the US should be banned.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alaskan Wilderness that we wish to drill belongs to the Inupiat Eskimo people. By drilling in their land, we would ruin their traditional way of life. They “rely on the land and resources of the North Slope for ... physical, …cultural, and …economic well-being” (Document D). The Eskimo people live on this land and although drilling may not have harmed them yet, slowly, over time, the land will degrade by pollutants and drilling. “We…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DRILLING IN ANWR

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to fully understand why drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is such a big deal; we need to understand the history of the refuge. ANWR was created in 1980 by the United States Department of Interior. According to Scott Wallace of Smithsonian, federal legislators, at the time, set the land aside, not only to protect the United States’ large herd of caribou, but also for “possible future oil and gas development” (Wallace 52). Without a doubt, ANWR is valuable, both for its ecological uniqueness and its natural resources. ANWR’s wildlife is varied, and, according to Wallace (53), “dazzling.” In addition to hosting herds of caribou, he says, the refuge is home to polar bears, migratory birds, wolves, wolverines, musk ox, arctic foxes and snowy owls (Wallace 53). However, the oil beneath ANWR is also valuable.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Endless Recovery

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Geologists have estimated the total amount of oil beneath the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 1002 Area by drilling cores and conducting ground, air, and seismic surveys to map underground rock formations. This amount differs from the “technically recoverable” and “economically recoverable” because the “technically recoverable” ranges from 4.3-11.8 billion barrels, while the estimated amount ranges from 11.6-31.5 billion barrels.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Drill or Not to Drill

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite growing concern over environmental issues, the United States continues to debate whether oil drilling is allowable in the coastal waters the nation. In the 2008 Presidential campaign, both Barrack Obama and John McCain reversed years of opposition to offshore drilling to garner more votes in response to public outcry over rising fuel prices (Ennis, 2008.) Although there are two sides to this issue, I find myself having a difficult time following the logic of supporting offshore drilling. I understand that, until the United States has a viable, reliable, and environmentally sound alternative to fossil fuels, we, as a nation, are in need of more oil. I also understand the nation’s desire to be free of its dependency on Middle Eastern oil. I cannot understand however, how destroying our own coastline is somehow preferable to paying a bit more at the gas station. The problem I am having with understanding the other side of the argument is simply that offshore drilling has proven to be unsafe for the environment on more than one occasion. Perhaps it is the result of growing up along the coastline in California. I cannot imagine the beaches I grew up with suddenly covered in crude oil.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument against Fracking

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I understand that hydraulic fracturing holds possibilities for many more jobs, tax revenue, and greater energy security. In a country that has had a terrible economy for years, it is reasonable for Americans to feel that fracking would be beneficial to them. Landowners and energy companies would make money from hydraulic fracturing. It would also create jobs for welders, drillers, chemists, and mechanics. New York could potentially drill four hundred wells per county and raise incomes by over $6-8 billion. Massive quantities of oil and clean-burning natural gas would improve our countries energy security and our ability to generate electricity, power vehicles, and heat homes for years to come. Although fracking presents us with these benefits, I believe that the negative impacts outweighs the increase of resources and revenue.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arctic Oil Drilling

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gas prices are increasing roughly every month or so as a result of the scarcity of oil. Some people just shrug the price increase off and cope with it, but the economic effect is far greater than it first appears. As the price of oil increases, so does the price of all other products that are transported. There is, however, an opportunity for the United States to increase the supply of available crude oil by drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The idea of drilling in the Arctic has been controversial and to the present day is still being debated. The United States’ need to determine whether drilling in the Arctic will be a worthwhile consideration, or if there are not sufficient benefits to counteract the harmful possibilities drilling possesses.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George W. Bush was a strong supporter for the drilling in Alaska. His argument for being pro drilling is that it will help our economy. Many new jobs would be created and that America would be less dependent on foreign sources of energy. This will improve America's economy which has took a plunge over the last few years. He also said that with all the studies that ANWR ( Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) has done that scientists have created was of drilling for the oil with having barely any effect on the earth. If this is true that means that most of the people who were opposed to it, because it would destroy wildlife, would be happy. The area that the drilling would be done in makes up only 8 percent of the whole refuge.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays