Preview

Why Does Nikolai Rubashov Confess To Crimes Against The Russian Revolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Does Nikolai Rubashov Confess To Crimes Against The Russian Revolution
Darkness at Noon Exam

Why does Nikolai Rubashov confess to crimes against the revolution that he has not committed?
What are the political options open to Rubashov following his arrest? Which option does he choose?
Are the implications of the political argument in Arthur Koester’s Darkness at Noon anti-revolutionary or merely anti-Stalinist?
Is Darkness at Noon an attempt to explain why the Russian Revolution in particular failed or is it an attempt to explain why all revolutions that rely on violent means to achieve their ends must fail?
What is the central political argument of Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon? What are the political implications of his argument?
Outline the most important differences in the political mentality
…show more content…
Rubashov has been a creature of the party for his whole life, and now the party demands that he should confess * Justice and objective truth have ceased to have any meaning for him * He feels superior to his Czarist officer who inhabits the next cell, showing the differences in thought processes from a person ingrained with the party ideology versus the ‘bourgeois’ angle who would uphold his honour * The officer believes that honour is about doing what you think is right, an individualist perspective, where as Rubashov contends that to uphold the honour of the regime/revolution is more honourable.
Ideology dictates the actions of all players in the regime – citizen and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Additionally, Raskolnikov’s confession to Sonia and the promise to also confess to the authorities is a huge step towards destroying that guilt he has had ever since the…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the end of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov confessed to the murder and was imprisoned in Siberia for eight years. Sonia followed him as "link" between the family. Rodya felt that the conditions of his life in prison were not bad although the other prisoners didn't like him. He also felt that he had to "submit to the idiocy of a sentence" because he saw his crime as a "blunder" because it could happen to anyone. (pg 535) His imprisonment in Siberia was the real punishment he had to face for his crime.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On page 134, the State Security senior lieutenant is trying to convince Sasha that he cannot join the Soviet Young Pioneers unless he spies on the citizens. Stalin had his Security ask people to spy on each other if they do not want to go to prison. If they did not listen, they can be executed or put in jail.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events of “Bloody Sunday” also played a dramatic role in the collapse of Tsardom. “Bloody Sunday” which was originally meant to be a peaceful protest by disgruntled steel workers in St. Petersburg took a twisted turn of events which forever tarnished the name of Tsar Nicholas II. Angered by the poor working conditions and the on-going war with Japan, thousands marched towards the Winter Palace to plead with the Tsar for reform. As the Tsar was not present at the time, panicky soldiers gunned down workers on the streets. The mass killings of dissident civilians possibly frightened the rest of the population into silent obedience, but would not have changed the fact that…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Petrov Affair

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another reason for defection was that he feared being arrested and killed by the Russian Government after he was associated with Beria and that if he went back to Russia, he would be purged as “Beria Man”.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pride factors strongly into the division between Raskolnikov and society and his resulting alienation. For example, Raskolnikov asks…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bolsheviks Primary Source

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In terms of content, the extract states that the Soviet Government enjoys support from the working class and the peasants and that victory of the Bolsheviks is just a matter of time. The second point tries to…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan Denisovich Sun

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The sun and the moon has long been seen as a dichotomy through many cultures and many people’s eyes. Day and night, hot and cold, the list can continue with different interpretations between individuals. But, in a Gulag labour camp where “a convict’s thoughts are no freer than he is” (40) – a man whose mind is only subjected to the unjust oppression by the Soviet Government – his ideas of what the sun and the moon can mean is significantly repressed to misfortunes that is perpetuated by the camp. In Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, the sun and the moon are symbols of three ideas that were derived from the Ivan Denisovich’s experience in the Gulag camp: incarceration and liberty . Although the sun is…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Gatsby Quotes

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, Rubashov's use of the word “I” in this excerpt is a departure from the collectivist mentality of the Party. He is in a state of conflict that is between the affiliation with his Party and his own identity. There are a few reasons that Rubashov's identity has began to resurface. First, the accusations that the Party made on Rubashov and his imprisonment have played a major role in this. There is also another reason that one could argue that has caused Rubashov's internal conflict. The juxtaposition of No.1's identity with Rubashov's in this chapter is not accidental. No. 1 is a clear opposite of Rubashov as he is depicted as an individual who has “faith in himself” contrasting Rubashov's loss of faith. Through No.1, we are able to reach a deeper understanding of Rubashov's conflict. Part of his conflict has stemmed from his imprisonment and the accusations of crimes he did not commit. However, a major source of his conflict is that his own identity, which he has viewed as trivial for so…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Raskolnikov confesses to the murder of Alyona and Lizaveta, he is sentenced to eight-years in a prison camp in Siberia, where he is forced to perform hard labor. Despite his confession, he still has not repented for his actions and refuses to surrender his heart, body, and soul completely to God. Even now, he still believes he did not commit anything inherently wrong or sinful. At this point, nothing has really changed significantly other than his environment--simply, same old feelings, just a different place. Due to his pride, he is obsessed with the idea that he is superior and “extraordinary” (249).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Feodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, the main character, Rodion Ramonovich Raskolnikov, becomes very ill due to guilt of a murder he committed. Many times during the novel, Raskolnikov debates whether or not he should confess his crime. When Raskolnikov visits the police station, he converses with an investigator by the name of Porfiry Petrovich. Porfiry is very aware of the crime, and knows without a doubt that Raskolnikov is the culprit. Porfiry does not approach Raskolnikov in the traditional manner of an investigator. Instead, he talks about nonsense that Raskolnikov has no interest in. When Rask feels that he is even close to being interrogated, he becomes offensive and demands that Porfiry stop playing games. Porfiry’s reaction to Rask is always apologetic and one of confusion. Porfiry proclaims that he only wants to have a conversation and nothing more. He states, “I gave it you with both hands, I, an examining magistrate! Don’t you see anything in that? If I suspected you at all, should I have done…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He knows that his sister Dounia is sacrificing herself for him in order to get money. This angers him exceptionally and he is furious that she could be so naive and foolish with her acceptance of such a selfish man’s proposal. His care for them is so extreme, that he thought to himself that he would have “murdered Luzhin” if he had seen him on the street so that he could save them (Dostoevsky 43). However, this is the extent of his love for his family. He proceeds to reject them after their arrival to Petersburg and again after his committing of the murder. He is very cold towards them and continues to alienate himself from them. He feels like he is unworthy of their love since he has sinned and they still support him, unknowing of what he has done. He treats his friend Razumihin even worse than his family. Razumihin is a man who is a better self of Raskolnikov. He is a tutor, loves his family, and does everything he can to help Raskolnikov in his time of need. Raskolnikov responds to this with short and brutal retorts. He shows no mercy on his friend and does his best to push him away, which has little effect on Razumihin. He does his very best to be cold towards those who care for him and wishes to be left alone with his…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    unbalanced if his wife can foresee her own death when they are still newly wed.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Conflict Between the Individual and the State and the Grammatical Fiction in Darkness At Noon <br><br>"The Party denied the free will of an individual-and at the same time exacted his willing self-sacrifice." The obvious contradiction of the above definition of the Communist party is depicts the conflict between the individual and the State in Arthur Koestler's novel Darkness at Noon. Koestler's protagonist Nicolas Salamanovich Rubashov, devout communist and former leader of the Communist party, falls victim to his own system during the time of the Moscow trials. Accused and imprisoned for crimes he did not commit, Rubashov is forced to choose between the ideology he has faithfully followed for the past forty years of his life, or a new found sense of self, which he calls the "grammatical fiction".<br><br>During the beginning of Rubashov's solitary incarceration, he begins to doubt the infallibility of the Communist regime, and for a time, views himself independent from the Party. Rubashov's pulling away from Communism is evident in his conversation with the examining magistrate, Ivanov, during his first hearing. Rubashov addresses Ivanov's collective viewpoint with the developing views of his own:<br><blockquote>"Your argument is somewhat anachronistic," said Rubashov. "As you quite rightly remarked, we were accustomed always to use the plural ‘we' and to avoid as far as possible the first person singular. I have rather lost the habit of this form of speech; you stick to it. But who is this ‘we' in whose name you speak to-day? It needs re-defining. That is the point."</blockquote><br><br>Apart from the Party, Rubashov no longer functions as part of the Communist unit, but rather as an individual. Within communist doctrine the individual is only a piece of a larger system, and for the true communist the pronoun ‘I' is not even part of his or her vocabulary. Rather, the personal ‘I' is replaced by ‘we', which represents the Party. The significance of Rubashov's…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics