Preview

Why Do Teens Kill Adult Criminals?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Teens Kill Adult Criminals?
When I was seven, my first pet was a bird that will always chirp. My family loves animals. For example, my mom would take the birds and sing with them. My mother will allow me to pet them and hold it every day after school for 10 minutes. One day my mom was busy, after school I decide to head home. Once I arrive I walked to the kitchen and open the cage and grabbed the bird myself. The bird stared biting my fingers, so I just started holding it tighter and tighter. I didn’t notice it was dead until blood started coming out from its mouth. I started crying I ran to my mom and told her the situation she was surprised. I thought I had committed a crime. Even though she knew I didn’t do it intentionally she punished me by spanking. Two things I learned in …show more content…
According to the article “many kids called unfit for adult trial,” Greg Kerkorian states his idea by saying “The study did not address whether any youths were wrongly convicted, Steinberg said that thousands of juveniles went to adult trial when they shouldn’t not have because their ability to understand the proceedings was seriously impaired.” Basically studies are saying if an 11 year old and 17 year old were into trial they wouldn’t be able to understand what’s going on. Another example from Krikorian’s article is “the study says younger individuals were less likely to recognize the risks inherent in different choices and less likely to think about the long-term consequences of their choices.” In other words, Krikorian believes that teens don’t think about their consequences and their choices they made in life, so considering them as adults is not a good idea. If a teen can’t explain why they did their crime then they shouldn’t be put as an adult. Although teens shouldn’t be trial as adults, but others feel that they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you ever ponder that if a juvenile should be tried as an adult? In my opinion, I believe a juvenile should not be tried as an adult. For example, they can change themselves. Though, juveniles should not be tried as an adult since their brain isn’t fully developed yet so they can’t comprehend the consequences fully, in other words children are not mature enough to be adults. Also juveniles should not be tried as an adult since they can get mentally hurt.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent V America

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should teens be tried as adults? Furthermore, would it stop teens from committing a crime if they were thrown in adult institutions? There are teens who commit crimes that could be judged as adults “On September 2, 1961, an intruder entered the apartment of a woman in the District of Columbia. He took her wallet. He raped her, the police found in the apartment latent finger prints. They matched the fingerprints of Morris Kent” (Kent). Morris is one of those teens. This intruder was a teen who was later tried as an adult. Due to the importance of trying teens as an adult, one must understand the background of the Kent v. United States case, know both sides and the impact the decision had on the future.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You see people everyday getting different sentences and consequences for the same crimes. This happens because defendants differ when it comes to mentality, past crimes, culpability and blameworthiness. There has been recent brain imaging technology that shows from the “prefrontal cortex to the limbic area, the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes during adolescence in ways that affect teens ability to reason, to weigh consequences for their decisions and to delay gratification long enough to make careful short and long term choices.” (Schwartz 2010). MacArthur and his researches concluded that young people under the age of fifteen should never be tried as an…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can they possibly be tried as adults, when they are physically incapable of thinking like one? Juveniles are not allowed to drink, drive, get married, and if they sign legal contracts, their signatures are invalid. Why? Because adolescents are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well-processed decisions; and this isn't just because of lack of inexperience in life. Adolescent brains are not fully developed until at least the age of 20. They lack the prefrontal cortex, the lobe of the brain that helps with reasoning and judgment. Teens also do not have a fully developed cerebellum, the area of the brain that helps control impulse. Without these two physical characteristics that separate the men from the boys, teenagers can not possibly be expected to endure the same consequence as fully matured adults.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Acuna was the latest person to be convicted with a death row sentence before the age of 18. In “Kids Are Kids until They Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom writers about a 12 year-old savagely beated a 6 year-old girl to death, Lionel Tate said he was imitating his world wrestler icon. In April. Nathaniel Braizl was charged with first-degree murder at the age of 14, for shooting an English teacher that didn’t let him say goodbye to two girls on the last day of school. In “Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult trial…” by Greg Krikorian researched that teens are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense in court. In studies shown thousands of Juveniles went to an adult trail when they shouldn’t because of their inability to stand the courts proceeding. In “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson discovers that the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers. The brain is like a puzzle that grows fast at the point of learning skills. Also, that the massive loss of brain tissue happens in teenage years at risk taking, controlling impulses, and self-control. The Supreme Court, adjurors on executing young juveniles as killers and to be convicted as adults. Young juveniles are incompetent on being well behaved as what Krikorian says “Seriously Impaired” or is that just an excuse? But knowing that you took a life is just unimaginable and horrifying. So if you did the crime now you’re going to pay the time. Even though your seriously impaired if you know that then why you take advance of that abuse and commit crimes. If you blame the teens you’re basically blaming the parents for unfit parenting their children. They don’t teach their kids form right or wrong and don’t control their kids. So minors are what so to be punished for what…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orange: Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adult?.” Alex Rooney stated, children who are below 10 year old supposedly know what is right and wrong. This tells us that even at young age, juveniles know things that can hurt other people. These days, young people are smarter compared to the past generations. In fact, they are more vulnerable and fearless, so they don’t care what might be the consequences to their actions even though it is a serious crime. One of the example is about the case of Nathaniel Brazill, he committed crime at the age of fourteen. He shot one of his teacher in middle school and plead guilty for second-degree murder. Nathaniel Brazill said that it was a “stupid mistake” but authorities looked at it as a planned crime.(Paul Thompson 2001) Despite of being aware towards their action, teenagers keeps on doing it. So, they must be punish for the crime they’ve done as…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will look at current scholarly thought to determine the effectiveness of trying juveniles as adults in a court of law. In extreme instances, juveniles of a broad range of ages have committed violent crimes that the criminal justice system has determined to be impossible to have been committed by the accepted frame of mind of a juvenile. These juveniles were tried in adult court and sentenced accordingly. The purpose of my research is to examine juveniles who have been tried as adults and to discuss its strengths and weaknesses. I will analyze the information that I gather and will provide a strong case that this practice is appropriate. Many people believe that some crimes are so terrible that the courts should focus on the type of offense and not on the age of the accused.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles in the adult criminal system are 34% more likely to be rearrested for another crime than youth retained in the juvenile system (Key Facts: Youth in the Justice System) so there for the juveniles aren’t learning their lesson. More and more teens are doing time alongside adults in prison recently after 100s years of adolescents committing serious crimes. Most juveniles tried as adults usually become reoffenders, they are not mature enough for adult jails, and they deserve another shot. Ultimately, the Juvenile Justice System was invented exactly for this purpose.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The only effective way to reduce and prevent juvenile crime is to balance tough enforcement measures with targeted, effective and intervention initiatives.” Juveniles are children and children don’t know any better and obviously make mistakes. They don’t expect to be caught after committing a serious crime. Juveniles brains are not fully developed until they are 25, but young people recognize them as adults at the age of 18. About 25,000 children a year have their cases sent to adult courts instead of being tried in juvenile courts, whose convicted defendants are usually set free by the time they turn 21. Trying juveniles as adults is not beneficial for them. But it also is a crime. And crimes are crimes whether…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ¨Children who commit serious crimes still have the ability to change their lives for the better. It is now time for state and federal officials to take positive steps by enacting policies that seek to redeem children, instead of throwing them in prison for the rest of their lives.” This is a quote from David Berger, who is a Deputy District Attorney for the County of Los Angeles, California. He believes that juveniles should not be charged as adults, even if the crime they committed is considered a ´tragedy´ and is thought to be ´horrid´. But we should not try juveniles as adults for many reasons.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However this research can not excuse teens of violent crimes, it does show that they are not yet adults and should not be treated as such (Thompson) “……. Juvenile being tried as adults are not competent enough to stand trial,” quoted from Laurence Steinberg taken from the article, “Many Kids called Unfit for adult trial,” by Greg Krikorian…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is because adolescence can be described as important transition in adulthood and it sometimes it is known to be fraught with different complications. It is of the essence to therefore, understand that there is a need to look at the system critically and ensure that each and every sub-sector of the juvenile incarceration is looked at critically and the underlying cause of the present problems looked at. Teenagers and adults are essentially different and therefore, should be assessed different in regards to their competency to stand trial. This is because, adolescence is an important transition into adulthood and it is in many cases fraught with complications. There is a need to assess the children as being children. The judicial system has been created for adults and consequently, it often becomes difficult to test the children in a court of adults. Juveniles should be assessed as to whether they were in the proper frame of mind when they committing the crime. They should also be assessed whether they could appreciate the fact that they were committing a crime and understood the consequences that came with their actions. It is for this reasons, that they can be able to stand trial in an adult court that has adult assessment…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed . In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” posted on the Sacramento Bee on May 25,2001 by Paul Thompson, he points out that “brain cells and connections in the teenage brain are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses ,risk taking and self control”. The fact that teenagers are losing brain cells responsible for their self control makes them vulnerable to making bad choices.Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed like an adult…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juvenile justice system has been in existence for over 100 years. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the child, not to enforce excessive punishment. The system involves children under the age of eighteen years old. There is a line between juveniles and adult offenders. Just because the offender is under the age of eighteen, does that make him or her incapable of being charged for a crime and be convicted just like an adult? This question comes to mind when a child commits a crime such as murder. Should a child be convicted and suffer the same consequences as an adult? Or should the system just accept the fact that the child does not know any better and release them? From a moral standpoint, it would not be fair to subject a child to the death penalty but it seems like the justice system outweighs many moral standpoints.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays