This leaves women in a weaker position to ward off tobacco. There have also been many new anti-smoking campaigns specifically targeting teens, but these stay true to the stereotype, only focusing on young women to say “smoking makes you ugly” (Stanford) Also, Marlboro’s new campaign ‘Be Marlboro’ targeting teens by showing- you guessed it- rebellious teens (Tobacco Free Kids). These are all developments that make the re-imagination of this icon necessary. Other, though less urgent, recent changes that make a reimagining of this project relevant (though not necessary) include more and more women's rights movements as well as dramatic changes in the image of the punk/rebellious teenage girl …show more content…
I wanted to create the same kind of images, but people have gotten less sensitive (Thompson). What was crazy then, is utterly mundane now. This is because of the ever changing rebel. The “edge” is always being pushed, and not by people on our side of it. These people, who seemed weird then and make us uncomfortable now will likely be boring in one or two generations. The edge is a concept I have toyed with a lot during this project. And I realized that what I was actually doing was asking myself the EQ: “What do we mean when we say American?” Sixty seven years ago, the American women was not thought of as independent Stanford), and a couple hundred years ago those of African descent were not legally, much less socially accepted as members. But today we pride ourselves on our civil rights and equalities and are known around the world for it… As far as assumptions go, I want to challenge the idea that only guys smoke. This stereotype is not only wrong, but is harmful to the women who are left more vulnerable to nicotine addiction