One of the biggest reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq was because of the belief that Iraq was harboring terrorists in their country and were helping terrorist to hide from the United States. After September the 11th, the United States decided to go to war with terrorism. First they started by attacking Afghanistan and by doing so intended of riding the world of terrorists in all other countries. When terrorist found out that the United States was coming for them, they fled to Iraq because they knew that Saddam Hussein would harbor them and give them immunity and protection from the United States. As President Bush said in his speech to the United States Congress "Saddam Hussein is harboring terrorists and the instruments of terror, the instruments of mass death and destruction. And he cannot be trusted. The risk is simply too great that he will use them, or provide them to a terror network." (Bush) By saying this public address to the world he was saying that it 's time for the United States to start taking action and to protect the people of the United States from terrorist and what they might do. Bush wanted to take immediate action towards Iraq because of the reason of the fact that Iraq could produce and help provide weapons of mass destruction to terrorists to inflict harm in the United States. "We could wait and hope that Saddam does not give weapons to terrorists, or develop a nuclear weapon to blackmail the world."(Bush) The United States was scared because of their beliefs that Saddam Hussein was trying to help terrorists so they took upon themselves to correct the problem and went to war with Iraq.
When going to war with Iraq the United States also considered the previous Gulf War with Iraq. "It is clear that, even before 9/11, President Bush wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. President Clinton wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. But President Bush wanted it more, and in a more aggressive form. He said several times during the presidential campaign that he wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. He allied himself with people who thought that his father had made a mistake in not sending American troops during the first Gulf war onto Baghdad to take out Saddam Hussein" (Lehmann) Now even though Iraq had been harboring terrorists the Bush Administration still wanted to get Saddam Hussein out of power and to help the Iraqi people to become a democratic state. Now Saddam had not been the highest priority until September 11th because the United States felt as if they were dealing with the situation in their own way and did not need to go to war with Iraq, but after September the 11th that all changed when Iraq was looked upon in harboring terrorist and also being looked at as a possible terrorist country themselves.
A Major reason of why the United States entered into war with Iraq was because of the belief that Saddam was producing weapons of mass destruction to use upon the United States and other countries. Now when going into war with Iraq the Bush Administration knew that by making these claims that they must come with evidence from all their actions taking place. After, the United States had successfully out rooted Saddam Hussein. The United States was able to get inspectors into place to determine if Saddam had really been developing weapons of mass destruction. Once inspectors were able to get full access to Iraq they came to the conclusion that Iraq had some materials for making weapons of mass destruction, but had no place that they were developing them. "The New York Times reported at the time that the U.N. weapons inspectors (not American intelligence) believed that Iraq possessed "the elements of a deadly germ warfare arsenal and perhaps poison gases, as well as the rudiments of a missile system" that could launch the warheads. But because of Saddam 's action at the end of 1997, the Times reported, the U.N. inspection team could "no longer verify that Iraq is not making weapons of mass destruction" and specifically could not monitor "equipment that could grow seed stocks of biological agents in a matter of hours." (Kagan) After the U.N. had came to the conclusion that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction the people of the United States started wondering of why we really did go to war with Iraq because if there were no weapons of mass destruction what else was there except Iraq harboring terrorists and being a terrorist country. Even though the United States was looking for weapons of mass destruction some things were destroyed before the UN could get to them. "United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration 's prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either."(Gellman) The final statement by the investigators saying that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction was the biggest blow to the reason of why the United States went to war with Iraq.
When looking at the biggest reason of why politically speaking the United States went to war with Iraq was because of oil. The Gulf War was due to oil production. Oil had always been a problem between Iraq and the international community. "America gets its oil from the global market, not from individual countries. But in the 1990s, oil-producing countries took a holiday from expanding production capacity, while demand grew steadily. With the supply/demand balance extremely tight, oil-producing states did not have the financial or engineering capacity to build the additional capacity, meaning the national oil companies in many OPEC states were faced with the need to open their fields to foreign investment. They resisted and prices rose"(Doherty) Iraq is one of the biggest oil producers and when that happened it created some bad blood between the United States and Iraq and since the Gulf War the United States has been wanting to get back at Iraq for what they had done to the U.S.
When considering going to war with Iraq the United States also had evidence that Saddam was being a malicious dictator of his people and onto others. "On Saddam Hussein 's orders, opponents have been decapitated, wives and mothers of political opponents have been systematically raped as a method of intimidation, and political prisoners have been forced to watch their own children being tortured."(Bush) When the United States found out that Saddam Was being a malicious dictator they immediately wanted to get Saddam in war crimes and international law violations, but to the American people that just wasn 't a good enough reason for the United States to go to war with Iraq at the time. When making the final decision the United States knew that if they were to find nothing that they could at least try Saddam in international court for his war crimes and the crimes against humanity.
When looking at all the possibilities of why the United States went to war with Iraq you can blame either terrorists, oil, crimes against humanity, or the suspicion of weapons of mass destruction. There are only two reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq that the Bush Administration as openly admitted. Those two would be that Iraq and Saddam were purposely harboring terrorists and giving them a safe place to hide from the United States and that the United States believed that Iraq was producing weapons of mass destruction. It is known that Iraq was indeed harboring terrorists, but finding no weapons of mass destructions was a bad thing for the United States because are reliability of our intelligence and whether or not going to war with the Iraq was good thing to do or not. Only time will tell all true reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq, for now we can only go on what the Bush Administration has been telling us and that of our own suspicion.
Works Cited
Bush, George. "President Bush On Iraq." 7 Oct. 2002. PBS. 5 Mar. 2005 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/bushspeech_10-7.html
Doherty, Patrick. "Why Bush Went to War." 5 Aug. 2004. Alternet. 28 Feb. 2005 http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/19472
Carter, Jimmy. "Just War--Or Just a War?" 9 Mar. 2003. New York Times. 7 Mar. 2005.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A1EFF3A5B0C7A8CDDAA0894DB404482
Chapman, John. "The Real Reasons Why We Went To War With Iraq." 28 Jul. 2004. Guardian Unlimited. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0%2C3604%2C1270414%2C00.html
Gellman, Barton. "Search In Iraq Fails To Find Nuclear Weapons." 26 Oct. 2003. Washingotn Post. 25 Feb. 2005. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer
Hollings, Ernest. "Why Were In Iraq." 7 May 2004. The State. 27 Feb. 2005. http://www.thestate.com/mld/state/news/opinion/8609339.htm
Kagan, Robert & Kristol, William. "Why We Went to War." 20 Oct. 2003. The Weekly Standard. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/236jmcbd.asp
Lehmann, Nicholas. "Iraq War Decision." 2004. Frontline. 4 Mar. 2005. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/choice2004/bush/war.html
Lehmann, Nicholas. "How It Came To War." 24 Mar. 2004. The New Yorker. 27 Feb. 2005. http://newyorker.com/printable/?fact/030331fa_fact
Woodard, Bob. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon & Schuster, April 2004
Cited: Bush, George. "President Bush On Iraq." 7 Oct. 2002. PBS. 5 Mar. 2005 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/bushspeech_10-7.html Doherty, Patrick Carter, Jimmy. "Just War--Or Just a War?" 9 Mar. 2003. New York Times. 7 Mar. 2005. Gellman, Barton. "Search In Iraq Fails To Find Nuclear Weapons." 26 Oct. 2003. Washingotn Post. 25 Feb. 2005. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer Hollings, Ernest Kagan, Robert & Kristol, William. "Why We Went to War." 20 Oct. 2003. The Weekly Standard. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/236jmcbd.asp Lehmann, Nicholas Lehmann, Nicholas. "How It Came To War." 24 Mar. 2004. The New Yorker. 27 Feb. 2005. http://newyorker.com/printable/?fact/030331fa_fact Woodard, Bob
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The reasons given for the original invasion of Iraq (Bush, 2003) mainly surrounded that there was supposedly "irrefutable" evidence that Iraq had, and was prepared to use, Weapons of Mass Destruction. The claim was that these weapons were an imminent danger to the USA. Once America invaded Iraq, and the initial success was replaced by a Vietnam-like war of attrition against an unseen enemy. The original reason for the invasion of Iraq was either mistaken or deliberately misleading, so no more soldiers should be lost in fighting for a war that was not needed.…
- 1010 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
After September 11, President Bush and his administration, associated the Iraqi regime with terrorism, and said Iraq had the capacity to produce Weapons of Mass Destruction, which could be used by terrorists to threaten the United States. Therefore, encouraging the U.S. citizens to support Bush and reelect him as President because he would take action by sending troops to Iraq, to find Saddam and other terrorists, while obtaining weapons that could potentially be used against the U.S. However, over time Bush and his administration began to lose support for their action taken in the war.…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Matusek, Matt. “Purpose of Iraq war murky to Americans.” 17 September 2004. The Online Rocket. 1 April 2008.…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Cited: ) Roy Rivenburg. Not Exactly the Most Reliable Way to Run a War, IMHO. The Los Angeles Times, May 1, 2001.…
- 1245 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hedges, Chris. “War is a Force that gives Us Meaning.” New York; Anchor, 2005, 2-14.…
- 1865 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cited: Zinn, Howard. Chpt 3: "War is the Health of the State" The Twentieth Century of People 's…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Bush, George W. “Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, Sept. 20, 2001.” US Capitol, 20 Sept. 2001. Web. 18 Nov. 2010…
- 1232 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Farley, J. E. (February, 2004). An American attack on Iraq is Not Justified. Opposing viewpoints, 45. Retrieved from http://www.coursework.info/social_studies/politics/international relations…
- 861 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Zinn, Howard. Passionate Declarations: Essays on War and Justice. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. Print.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The war in Iraq was declared in March 2003 for many reasons. Some of the reasons are to free Iraq, the oil, and because Saddam Hussein did not allow weapons inspectors search for nuclear weapons. The US wanted to take over Iraq and free its people from the torture they had been enduring for so long. Saddam Hussein had developed weapons of mass destruction that posed a long-term threat to America. He denied weapons inspectors access to search for nuclear war weapons and this served as a threat to other countries. The aim had been the destruction of the Iraqi society enabling the US and Britain to gain control of Iraq's huge…
- 682 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Also, the United State's real reasons for invading Iraq were ultimately to gain some economical benefits, but it actually is resulting in our economy failing. The war has cost billions and billions of dollars and we are all ready in a 12 trillion dollar debt. It's not the government that is paying for this war. The people paying for the war are American citizens that pay taxes. I do not want to be contributing financially to a War that I do not agree with.…
- 282 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Parko, Joe. "Standing Against an Unjust War." The Nation. 5 July 2006. 23 October 2008.…
- 322 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the years following Iraqi freedom in 2003, much controversy arose concerning President bush's plan to invade Iraq and remove Saddam hussein from power. This was because people believed that we didn't need to invade iraq and that President bush lied about him having weapons of mass destruction so we could go in and harvest the oil in the area. In my opinion I believe that bush did lie about the weapons to invade Iraq but not just for the oil. I think that It was mainly about getting him out of power because of all the fear he put into the council and countries of the United nations. I do think it was the right course of action getting this man out of power and avoiding and future world threats.…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Former President George Bush used a lot of historical fact to justify his argument of invading Iraq. He said things such as: Iraq’s technological abilities, their weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein’s previous threats against the US. He sounds like he has significant evidence to back up his speech, until he said “Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. Well, we don’t know exactly…” This statement only disapproved his previous statements.…
- 361 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
6. Lomperis, Timothy J. The War Everyone Lost - and Won. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1993…
- 2521 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays