top-rated free essay

Why Did The United States Go To War With Iraq?

By rylanowen Apr 06, 2005 1671 Words
In the recent war with Iraq Americans wants to really know why did the United States go to war with Iraq? There are several conclusions that people have come to. Some of the main reasons that the United States went to war with Iraq was because of the belief that Saddam Hussein was harboring terrorists in Iraq and that he had in his possession weapons of mass destruction whether they were nuclear or gas bombs the United States had no idea. When also looking at reasons why the United States decided to enter into war with Iraq was because of the oil and the debate of how much is too much for a barrel of oil. Also that the United States wanted to get Saddam Hussein out of power and charge him with war crimes for killing his own people of Iraq.

One of the biggest reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq was because of the belief that Iraq was harboring terrorists in their country and were helping terrorist to hide from the United States. After September the 11th, the United States decided to go to war with terrorism. First they started by attacking Afghanistan and by doing so intended of riding the world of terrorists in all other countries. When terrorist found out that the United States was coming for them, they fled to Iraq because they knew that Saddam Hussein would harbor them and give them immunity and protection from the United States. As President Bush said in his speech to the United States Congress "Saddam Hussein is harboring terrorists and the instruments of terror, the instruments of mass death and destruction. And he cannot be trusted. The risk is simply too great that he will use them, or provide them to a terror network." (Bush) By saying this public address to the world he was saying that it's time for the United States to start taking action and to protect the people of the United States from terrorist and what they might do. Bush wanted to take immediate action towards Iraq because of the reason of the fact that Iraq could produce and help provide weapons of mass destruction to terrorists to inflict harm in the United States. "We could wait and hope that Saddam does not give weapons to terrorists, or develop a nuclear weapon to blackmail the world."(Bush) The United States was scared because of their beliefs that Saddam Hussein was trying to help terrorists so they took upon themselves to correct the problem and went to war with Iraq.

When going to war with Iraq the United States also considered the previous Gulf War with Iraq. "It is clear that, even before 9/11, President Bush wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. President Clinton wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. But President Bush wanted it more, and in a more aggressive form. He said several times during the presidential campaign that he wanted Saddam Hussein out of power. He allied himself with people who thought that his father had made a mistake in not sending American troops during the first Gulf war onto Baghdad to take out Saddam Hussein" (Lehmann) Now even though Iraq had been harboring terrorists the Bush Administration still wanted to get Saddam Hussein out of power and to help the Iraqi people to become a democratic state. Now Saddam had not been the highest priority until September 11th because the United States felt as if they were dealing with the situation in their own way and did not need to go to war with Iraq, but after September the 11th that all changed when Iraq was looked upon in harboring terrorist and also being looked at as a possible terrorist country themselves.

A Major reason of why the United States entered into war with Iraq was because of the belief that Saddam was producing weapons of mass destruction to use upon the United States and other countries. Now when going into war with Iraq the Bush Administration knew that by making these claims that they must come with evidence from all their actions taking place. After, the United States had successfully out rooted Saddam Hussein. The United States was able to get inspectors into place to determine if Saddam had really been developing weapons of mass destruction. Once inspectors were able to get full access to Iraq they came to the conclusion that Iraq had some materials for making weapons of mass destruction, but had no place that they were developing them. "The New York Times reported at the time that the U.N. weapons inspectors (not American intelligence) believed that Iraq possessed "the elements of a deadly germ warfare arsenal and perhaps poison gases, as well as the rudiments of a missile system" that could launch the warheads. But because of Saddam's action at the end of 1997, the Times reported, the U.N. inspection team could "no longer verify that Iraq is not making weapons of mass destruction" and specifically could not monitor "equipment that could grow seed stocks of biological agents in a matter of hours." (Kagan) After the U.N. had came to the conclusion that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction the people of the United States started wondering of why we really did go to war with Iraq because if there were no weapons of mass destruction what else was there except Iraq harboring terrorists and being a terrorist country. Even though the United States was looking for weapons of mass destruction some things were destroyed before the UN could get to them. "United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration's prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either."(Gellman) The final statement by the investigators saying that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction was the biggest blow to the reason of why the United States went to war with Iraq.

When looking at the biggest reason of why politically speaking the United States went to war with Iraq was because of oil. The Gulf War was due to oil production. Oil had always been a problem between Iraq and the international community. "America gets its oil from the global market, not from individual countries. But in the 1990s, oil-producing countries took a holiday from expanding production capacity, while demand grew steadily. With the supply/demand balance extremely tight, oil-producing states did not have the financial or engineering capacity to build the additional capacity, meaning the national oil companies in many OPEC states were faced with the need to open their fields to foreign investment. They resisted and prices rose"(Doherty) Iraq is one of the biggest oil producers and when that happened it created some bad blood between the United States and Iraq and since the Gulf War the United States has been wanting to get back at Iraq for what they had done to the U.S.

When considering going to war with Iraq the United States also had evidence that Saddam was being a malicious dictator of his people and onto others. "On Saddam Hussein's orders, opponents have been decapitated, wives and mothers of political opponents have been systematically raped as a method of intimidation, and political prisoners have been forced to watch their own children being tortured."(Bush) When the United States found out that Saddam Was being a malicious dictator they immediately wanted to get Saddam in war crimes and international law violations, but to the American people that just wasn't a good enough reason for the United States to go to war with Iraq at the time. When making the final decision the United States knew that if they were to find nothing that they could at least try Saddam in international court for his war crimes and the crimes against humanity.

When looking at all the possibilities of why the United States went to war with Iraq you can blame either terrorists, oil, crimes against humanity, or the suspicion of weapons of mass destruction. There are only two reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq that the Bush Administration as openly admitted. Those two would be that Iraq and Saddam were purposely harboring terrorists and giving them a safe place to hide from the United States and that the United States believed that Iraq was producing weapons of mass destruction. It is known that Iraq was indeed harboring terrorists, but finding no weapons of mass destructions was a bad thing for the United States because are reliability of our intelligence and whether or not going to war with the Iraq was good thing to do or not. Only time will tell all true reasons of why the United States went to war with Iraq, for now we can only go on what the Bush Administration has been telling us and that of our own suspicion.

Works Cited

Bush, George. "President Bush On Iraq." 7 Oct. 2002. PBS. 5 Mar. 2005 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec02/bushspeech_10-7.html

Doherty, Patrick. "Why Bush Went to War." 5 Aug. 2004. Alternet. 28 Feb. 2005 http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/19472

Carter, Jimmy. "Just War--Or Just a War?" 9 Mar. 2003. New York Times. 7 Mar. 2005.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A1EFF3A5B0C7A8CDDAA0894DB404482

Chapman, John. "The Real Reasons Why We Went To War With Iraq." 28 Jul. 2004. Guardian Unlimited. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0%2C3604%2C1270414%2C00.html

Gellman, Barton. "Search In Iraq Fails To Find Nuclear Weapons." 26 Oct. 2003. Washingotn Post. 25 Feb. 2005. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer

Hollings, Ernest. "Why Were In Iraq." 7 May 2004. The State. 27 Feb. 2005. http://www.thestate.com/mld/state/news/opinion/8609339.htm

Kagan, Robert & Kristol, William. "Why We Went to War." 20 Oct. 2003. The Weekly Standard. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/236jmcbd.asp

Lehmann, Nicholas. "Iraq War Decision." 2004. Frontline. 4 Mar. 2005. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/choice2004/bush/war.html

Lehmann, Nicholas. "How It Came To War." 24 Mar. 2004. The New Yorker. 27 Feb. 2005. http://newyorker.com/printable/?fact/030331fa_fact

Woodard, Bob. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon & Schuster, April 2004

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • The Iran-Iraq War

    ...The Iran-Iraq war, also known as the First Gulf War, was fought between the countries of Iraq and Iran from September 1980 to August 1988. The Iraqi invasion of Iran triggered the start of the war, and thus began what it would be considered as the longest conventional war of the twentieth century. Iraq, after having a long history of territorial...

    Read More
  • Iraq War

    ...Iraq War (Persian Gulf War and the present day Iraq War.) The Persian Gulf Wars took place in the country of Iraq, located in the Middle East between Iran and Saudi Arabia. It is also bordered by Jordan and Syria to the west, Kuwait to the south, and Turkey to the north. Only thirty-six miles of Iraq’s borders touch the Persian Gulf. During t...

    Read More
  • The War in Iraq: Invasion of Ba'athist Iraq by the United States of America

    ...Samuel Lopez Prof. Phr 102 War to me is painless it has no feelings or remorse for anybody or anything that crosses its path and will not stop for anything unless its purpose its fulfilled. We live in a time of war and ever since I was born I have always seen it around me and the society I live in. Thankfully I have never been a victim but...

    Read More
  • The Iraq War

    ...The Iraq War The Iraq war was an armed conflict in Iraq that consisted of two phases. The first was an invasion of Ba'athist Iraq starting on 20 March 2003 by an invasion force led by the United States. It was followed by a longer phase of fighting, in which an insurgency emerged to oppose coalition forces and the newly for...

    Read More
  • The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq

    ...We are here tonight to talk about the ethics of war. Now to some minds this phrase “the ethics of war” will likely cause raised eyebrows. “The ethics of war? What can ethics possibly have to do with war? Isn’t war evil?” Well, of course it is. War is a terrible thing. The existence and prevalence of war in history is, in fact, ample...

    Read More
  • War on Iraq Was Not Justified

    ..." War on iraq was not justified" The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had vanished, and U.S. and allied officials pronounced the end of major combat opera...

    Read More
  • Iraq War

    ...S. invasion of Iraq. Regardless of your views on the wisdom of that decision, it's fair to say that the results were not what most Americans expected.  Now that the war is officially over and most U.S. forces have withdrawn, what lessons should Americans (and others) draw from the experience? There are many lessons that one might learn, of cour...

    Read More
  • Why Nations Go to War

    ...Why Nations Go To War In John Stoessinger’s work on “Why Nations go to War” he examines ten wars that have occurred since 1914 and the one currently taking place today. These wars include World War One, World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam War, Yugoslavian War, Indo-Pakistani War, Arab-Israel War, Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait War, War on Ter...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.