Preview

Why Did Turkey Join The European Union

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Turkey Join The European Union
expense of the Ottoman Empire, recently defeated in World War I. Greek borders fell in 1922, giving Turkey the advantage. The two countries negotiated the terms of surrender, and decided the leave the border the same as before the war with the Treaty of Sevres. Turkey did not follow the treaty, and the Treaty of Sevres was abandoned for the Treaty of Lausanne, which was imposed by the Ottoman Empire and instituted the formal loss of Cyprus and Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Turkey continues to invade Cyprus, claiming it as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, a partially recognized state compromises the northeastern portion of the island. The Turkish fixation on the island of Cyprus is a bone of contention for Cyprus, Turkey, and Greece, which halts …show more content…
Under the customs agreement Turkey had already signed as a precondition to start EU negotiations in 2005, it is obliged to open its ports to Cypriot planes and vessels, but Turkey has not complied. Greece and Cyprus have been member states of the European Union since 1981 and 2004 respectively, which means their consent is mandatory for Turkey to join the European Union in a formal capacity. The historical strife between the two countries is unlikely to be solved, granting Turkish alignment with the Union, because of the essential dictatorship of the country. This will stop progression of social institutions within the country, like membership with the European Union, because of the absolute power of current Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Joining the Union and cooperating with the guidelines in place, would mean any major decisions about Turkey would be brought to the Union for a vote, and the decision would be made through several tiers of deliberation and group thought. Historically speaking, dictatorship does not welcome conflicting opinions on diplomatic …show more content…
The current system in Turkey takes place in a framework of a secular parliamentary representative democratic republic, whereby the Prime Minister of Turkey is the head of government, and the President of Turkey is the head of state who holds a largely ceremonial role with substantial reserve powers. Turkey's political system is based on a separation of powers, where executive power is exercised by the Council of Ministers. Legislative power is with the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. The problem with this system is that it leaves too much power to the Prime Minister (President is also used interchangeably) and has the ability to take power away from the Grand National Assembly. A major reform was passed in Parliament in January 21 2017 and approved by referendum the following April reinforcing the role of the president and granted Erdoğan “broad powers to make law by decree, the abolition of the office of the Prime Minister and of Turkey’s parliamentary system”, essentially establishing Erdoğan as a dictator. This is in direct offense with the guidelines established to join the European Union, as there is expected to be a free and democratic society, which grants the people of said country the ability to vote and have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1922 the Turkish government decided they wanted their land back and threatened to attack…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turkey and Georgia both have semi-presidential systems. A large difference between the two Governments is the amount of power the president holds. In Georgia, the majority of the power resides with the prime minister. The prime minister is the head of government with full executive authority over domestic and foreign affairs. The president is the head of state, but cannot legislate nor propose a state budget. By implementing these stipulations for the president, Georgia has decreased the corruption that is found within this branch. (3) Whereas, in Turkey the president has been directing them to a more authoritarian rule. He is cracking down on peaceful protesters, removing judges and prosecutors that disagree with him, and replacing the government with one that puts religion at the center of the people’s lives. (4) Although the prime minister holds the most power in the government the current president is trying to change that. He has tightened his grip on the judiciary, and implemented more restrictions on the media. He is also trying to pass a constitutional amendment that will give the president more power than the prime minister.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Treaty of Sèvres with Turkey in 1920 was mainly about splitting up the Turkish empire between France and Britain, but as part of the Treaty, most of the small area of Turkey-in-Europe around Constantinople was given to Greece. In fact, however, this did not last very long – the Turks went to war with the Greeks and drove them out, and the Treaty of Lausanne 1923 gave back this land to Turkey.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Page 65 Then, in August 1920, the Triple Entente “presented the Turkish government with [a peace treaty called] the Treaty of Sèvres. Anatolia, the Turkish heartland, was divided into French, Italian and American spheres of influence, with Smyrna becoming a Greek protectorate (a country or region that is defended and controlled by a more powerful state).” The Turkish Straits became an international zone…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) What did Truman tell Congress the United States had received from the Greek Governments?…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article on “Turkey Votes for the Strongman” talks about how Turkey recently just voted to get the AKP back in control after voting the opposite way this…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Eager to destroy Russian military power in the Black Sea and reclaim lost territory in the Balkans, Turkey enters into an agreement with Germany and Austria-Hungary to join the Central Powers. The Ottoman Empire launches simultaneous surprise attacks on the four most significant Black Sea ports in the Russian Empire.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The National Assembly, which first convened on 23 April 1920, that was the first clue to the Turkish Republic. The successful management of the War of Independence by this assembly accelerated the founding of the new Turkish State. On the 1 of November 1922, the offices of the Sultan and caliph were severed from one other and the former was abolished. There were no longer any administrative ties with the Ottoman Empire. On the 29 of October 1923, Turkish Republic was formally proclaimed and Kemal was unanimously elected as its first President. On 30 October 1923, the first government of the Republic was formed. The Republic started to grow on the foundations of the twin principles "Sovereignty, unconditionally belongs to the nation" and "peace at home, peace in the…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Balkan war broke due to when The Treaty of London ended the First Balkan war by signing on the 30th of May 1913 , acknowledging that the Balkan states gained west of the Enos-Medea line and had created an independent Albania, meaning that the Balkan League (consisting of Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, and Bulgaria) succeeded in conquering the European provinces of the Ottoman Empire (Albania, Macedonia and Thrace), leaving the Ottomans with only the Chatalja and Gallipoli peninsulas. This did not satisfy anyone.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Middle East at 1914 was at the crossroads. The once great Ottoman Empire that had been the dominant political force in the Middle East was decaying, loosing ground to the independence Arab movements. In October 1914, the Ottoman Empire that had been severely weakened due to defeat in the Balkan war joined the central powers in the war against the Triple Entente. The Ottomans had controlled the Middle East since the 13th century. Britain’s main aim was to defeat Germany on the Western front and the core of its army was needed in Europe to fight trench warfare. However, Britain’s economic and strategic interests in the Middle East pressured them into nevertheless confronting Turkey. Britain hoped to protect its colonial interests in the region and have a dominant role in the post-war partitioning of the Ottoman Empire among the Allied powers. France also had its interest in the region and the two countries established the Sykes-Picot agreement in 1916 that divided the Middle East into areas of influence.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, proponents who think government should give more rights to immigrants think, that people do not want to leave their land but they had to do for protect themselves and people should respect them and give them more rights. On the other hand, opponents who think government should not give more rights to immigrants say that, immigrants refuge our country but Turkish Republic has its own citizens and it has to give intiative for its own citizens. If it does not do that, caos will be stared by citizens. In age of ottoman empire, there is lots of example. When ottoman empire gives more rights to immigrants, ottomans revolted.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman And The Cold War

    • 1863 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nevertheless, Turkey now needs our support. Since the war, Turkey has sought additional financial assistance from Great Britain and the United States for the purpose of effecting that modernization necessary for the maintenance of its national integrity. That integrity is essential to the preservation of order in the Middle East. The British government has informed us that, owing to its own difficulties, it can no longer extend financial or economic aid to Turkey. As in the case of Greece, if Turkey is to have the assistance it needs, the United States must supply it. We are the only country able to provide that help.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eastern Mediterranean island of Cyprus is the homeland of two distinct peoples: the Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots. Their relationship is not one of a majority and minority, but one of equal partnership. The Turkish Cypriots speak Turkish, are Muslims and share the culture of their motherland, Turkey. The Greek Cypriots, on the other hand, speak Greek, are Orthodox Christians and profess the culture of their motherland Greece. After more than 300 years of Turkish rule, the island came under British influence in 1878, but sovereignty was formally transferred by Turkey to Britain in 1923. British colonial administration continued until 1960 when as a joint bi-communal state, the DRepublic of Cyprus was founded under international treaties, signed by Great Britain, Greece and Turkey, and by the leaders of both the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities in their separate capacities. The 1960 arrangements created a political partnership between the two national communities which would enable them to share power and cooperate in a bi-communal state, with the necessary checks and balances and guarantees. Unfortunately, this political partnership and the internationally sanctioned regime lasted only three years.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    yprus conflict is interesting because of the variety of events that caused it, as it was not based purely on the conflict between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, but also because of the British ‘divide and rule’ policy and the intervention of other states including Turkey. Moreover, Cyprus is divided not only politically divided, but also socially and culturally. Another fact, is that Cyprus was independent only for some period of time in the 20th century. They gained independence in 1960 from the U.K. and lost it in 1974 when Greek military junta carried out a coup d'état (an overthrow of state by the military). Also, in 1974 the Turks invaded Cyprus which lead to the partition of the island and forced displacement of the Greeks. The situation…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays