Why Did Tsarism Survive The 1905 Revolution Essay
Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917?
The key reason that Tsarsim survived the 1905 revolution but not that of March 1917 was because of military support; however, the Dumas, peasants and World War I were also important contributing factors.In 1905, apart from single incident of the Mutiny aboard Battleship Potemkin - in which the crew rebelled against their oppressive officers - the army were fully behind the Tsar and his oppressive regime, even to the point where they contributed to Bloody Sunday, in which many Tsar opposing rioters were shot and killed. However, it added to the support for the 1917 revolution as the army did not want a repeat of it and it acted as a deterrent to rioters in 1905, but …show more content…
The Duma were council assemblies and a form of Russian governmental institution that was formed during the reign of the last Tsar, Nicholas II. They only existed because, as a result of the 1905 revolutions, the Tsar had to make the people feel they had more control over their country, so his solution was to create them and prevent more rebellion. The Duma didn’t exist during the 1905 rebellion, but instead, were the change that stopped it. In 1917 however, when rebellion began again, the Tsar dismissed the Duma, further angering the people. The Duma refused to leave though, and instead, reconvened on the 14th February, forming a Provisional Government, and they did not support the Tsar. Sensing that he was losing, with his military forces compromised and the provisional government giving the people an alternative to support, the Tsar offered to share half his power with the Provisional Government. Their leader at the time, Mikhail Rodzianko, refused this offer, leading to the abdication of the Tsar. In 1905, political resistance like this would have been met with military action and the execution or exile of all members involved, but with a mutinying army, the Duma was successful in establishing an alternative Russian regime. Therefore, this contributed to the success of the eventual downfall of Tsarism, which was a key difference between 1905 and
The key reason that Tsarsim survived the 1905 revolution but not that of March 1917 was because of military support; however, the Dumas, peasants and World War I were also important contributing factors.In 1905, apart from single incident of the Mutiny aboard Battleship Potemkin - in which the crew rebelled against their oppressive officers - the army were fully behind the Tsar and his oppressive regime, even to the point where they contributed to Bloody Sunday, in which many Tsar opposing rioters were shot and killed. However, it added to the support for the 1917 revolution as the army did not want a repeat of it and it acted as a deterrent to rioters in 1905, but …show more content…
The Duma were council assemblies and a form of Russian governmental institution that was formed during the reign of the last Tsar, Nicholas II. They only existed because, as a result of the 1905 revolutions, the Tsar had to make the people feel they had more control over their country, so his solution was to create them and prevent more rebellion. The Duma didn’t exist during the 1905 rebellion, but instead, were the change that stopped it. In 1917 however, when rebellion began again, the Tsar dismissed the Duma, further angering the people. The Duma refused to leave though, and instead, reconvened on the 14th February, forming a Provisional Government, and they did not support the Tsar. Sensing that he was losing, with his military forces compromised and the provisional government giving the people an alternative to support, the Tsar offered to share half his power with the Provisional Government. Their leader at the time, Mikhail Rodzianko, refused this offer, leading to the abdication of the Tsar. In 1905, political resistance like this would have been met with military action and the execution or exile of all members involved, but with a mutinying army, the Duma was successful in establishing an alternative Russian regime. Therefore, this contributed to the success of the eventual downfall of Tsarism, which was a key difference between 1905 and