Preview

Why Did The Sarbanes Oxley Act Fail

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Sarbanes Oxley Act Fail
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Matthew Greenwell
Professor Eric Weitner
XACC-291
January 23, 2015

In any society there will be people that will do anything to succeed in life which includes breaking the law or even finding loop holes within laws. Now the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a federal law to try and protect shareholders and the general public from fraudulent practices but in the end it is just a law and all laws can be broken. Some critics have pointed out the “Madoff scandal as a prime example of how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has failed” (Fuller, 2009). But just because a system fails doesn 't mean you give up or stop it means that you need to perfect the system. So where does the government go from here? Do they make more laws or add more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) originated on July 29, 2002 due to fraudulent bookkeeping practices and misleading financial reports from large corporations. These practices created a number of accounting scandals, which resulted in this in the government creating such an act. The purpose was to prevent and punish corporate corruption and, along the way, try to repair investor confidence. The law was passed by congress after well-known companies (Enron, Peregrine Systems and Tyco International, to name a few) caused great humiliations to its investors, which in result cost them billions of dollars. The share prices of the affected companies collapsed, which shook public confidence in the nation’s securities markets.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc291Individual Paper

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was created in response to the series of misleading and fraudulent activities of publicly traded big business’s in the 1990s. During this time, multiple large publicly-traded businesses increased their stock prices by “publishing false or deceptive financial statements” (Lasher, 2008, p. 187). The most publicly charged company was Enron, which was then followed by Xerox, WorldCom and Global Crossing. This resulted in millions of dollars of stock market value disappearing in what seemed to be overnight. It is in response to these events that Congress drafted and passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is mandatory. All large and small organizations must comply with this act. The legislation came into existence in 2002 as a result of a number of corporate and accounting scandals and introduced major changes to the regulation of financial practice and corporate governance. The main architects of the acts were Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley. The SOX act protects the shareholders from forged representations in corporate financial statements. The financial information on which the investors rely should be truthful and its accuracy must be verified by an independent third party.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Financial reporting has been dissected over and over again by legislation. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hold the key to providing protection and integrity when companies are submitting their financial statements. Although their mission is to provide order and efficiency for financial markets, insidious plans are still developed by companies which ultimately result in turmoil to the economy. To provide a safeguard to investors, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed by congress in 2002, which was constructed because of fraudulent acts of well-known companies such as Enron. Before the SOX was inaugurated, two sets of accounting rules were used as guides for CPA firms.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, often abbreviated as SOX, is a legislative act passed by Congress in response to the Enron and WorldCom financial scandals. The primary purpose of SOX is to protect shareholders from errors or fraudulent reporting by the company they have invested in. The Sarbanes-Oxley act is enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission, a department dedicated to ensuring compliance to SOX from all firms, and is also responsible for revising provisions of the act in order to keep it current and up to date.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (often shortened to SOX) is legislation enacted in response to the highprofile Enron and WorldCom financial scandals to protect shareholders and the general public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices in the enterprise. The act is administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which sets deadlines for compliance and publishes rules on requirements. Sarbanes-Oxley is not a set of business practices and does not specify how a business should store records; rather, it defines which records are to be stored and for how long. The legislation not only affects the financial side of corporations, it also affects the IT departments whose job it is to store a corporation's electronic records. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act states that all business records, including electronic records and electronic messages, must be saved for "not less than five years." The consequences for non-compliance are fines, imprisonment, or both. IT departments are increasingly faced with the challenge of creating and maintaining a corporate records archive in a cost-effective fashion that satisfies the requirements put forth by the legislation. FAQ: What is the impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on IT operations? The following sections of Sarbanes-Oxley contain the three rules that affect the management of electronic records. The first rule deals with destruction, alteration, or falsification of records.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is an act passed by U.S. Congress in 2002 to protect investors and the general public from the possibility of fraudulent accounting activities by corporations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act authorized strict modifications to improve financial disclosures from corporations and to prevent accounting fraud. This law was passed after a couple of big the accounting scandals like Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom shook investor assurance in financial statements and required an overhaul of regulatory standards. The act is administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which sets deadlines for compliance and publishes rules on requirements. It is not a set of business practices and does not specify how a business should store records; rather it tells more which records are to be stored and for how long in case of hearings.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was created by sponsors U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes(D-MD) and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH) in response to very public corporate fraud and accounting scandals. In a seemingly short period of time, Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom all collapsed. The majority of these scandals resulted from the inaccurate reporting of financial transactions. The financial statements of these organizations were so gravely misrepresented and misstated that once the organizations' records were presented fairly, it caused the total collapse of the company. As a result of these scandals, investors lost billions of dollars when the share prices collapsed, and the public lost confidence in the nation's securities markets and the auditor who were supposed to protect the public's interest.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is the most far-reaching change in organizational control and accounting regulations since the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The new law made securities fraud a criminal offense and made more strict penalties for corporate fraud. The law now requires top executives to sign off on their firms financial reports, and they risk fines and long jail sentences if they…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SOX which is also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act was enacted in July, 30, 2002 as a prompt response to the financial crimes scandals (Adelphia, Enron, WorldCom, Peregrime Systems , Arther Anderson and Tyco International). SOX establishes new, stricter standards for all US publicly traded companies. It does not apply to privately companies. The Act is administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which deals with compliance, rules and requirements. The Act also created a new agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, which is in charge of overseeing, regulating, inspecting, and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies. In my opinion, the benefits of the act cant be able to overcome the frustration and the cost of it.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question asked, did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act make any difference and why or why not do I think this way.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 Week 3

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This article is about Congress a suggested revoke of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002. According to this article, the proposal came across as an excuse for some government officials to avoid topics that were is demand of resolution by the public. According to this article, “the SOA of 2002 is unnecessary, harmful, and inadequate” (Niskanen, 2005). Penalties under SOA involved jail time and loss of personal property (Niskanen, 2005).…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Chapter 5: the Sarbanes- Oxley act of 2002 involved the public anger that started when Enron, WorldCom, and other big companies scandals. This is when there was support for white collar crime when it came to accounting standards. Under the law of federal sentencing rules to make sure that white collar criminals are being punished. (Barnes, 2012). 1. For someone to alter or get rid of documents and there intensions to obstruct or effect the crime/case. 2. The CEO (chief executive officer) and the CFO (chief financial officer) must clarify that repots have been submitted to the SEC (securities and exchange commission.) it is a crime if the CEO and CFO make a report that is false. 3 CEO and CFO must reimburse the company for any raises and if…

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Accountibility is closely linked to corporate governance in the respect that corporate accountability largely determines corporate governance.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment: 1 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Say Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to anyone who is in the field of business and they will be able to tell you a story of Enron’s fraud and that it was because of Enron fraud SOX was created. Enron case was the case where the leaders were accuse of fraud because of the $1.2 billion reduction of owners’ equity in 2001. “Enron’s founder Kenneth Lay and CEO Jeffrey Skilling were accused of misleading investors about Enron’s financial health, including artificially inflating earnings, overvaluing assets, hiding losses, and tapping reserves to meet or beat earnings forecasts” (Sanchez & Zhang, 2012, p.4). The two accused believed that there was no way for them to hold responsible for knowing every little financial transaction that occurred. This case relied heavily on the expert opinion of forensic accountants to prove whether the leader committed fraud. The defense accountants believed Enron had followed generally accepted accounting principles on disclosing earnings and losses. The accountants held the view that the officers knowing and intentional committed fraud was based on opinion and that “reasonable minds (the prosecution) could differ”. The expert accountants believe that even if the mistakes ($1.2 billion dollar mistake) was known to the public the average user will still draw to the same conclusion as if the mistakes were unknown. The prosecution auditors believed that Enron overvalued their underperforming assets, such as overvaluing a power plant by $1 billion, and that is why the company had to reduce the shareholder equity by $1.2 billion. The accountants for the defense counter this accusation by saying that some of the…

    • 2233 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays