Preview

Why did the expansion of slavery become the most divisive political issue in the 1840s and 1850s?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did the expansion of slavery become the most divisive political issue in the 1840s and 1850s?
Why did the expansion of slavery become the most divisive political issue in the 1840s and 1850s?
After the depression of 1837 in the South and the Indian removal, Americans had expanded their territory further in the West by the 1840s. The expansion in the land inspired the expansion of slavery. In the 1840s and 1850s, this expansion of slavery became the most divisive political issue since it caused the Texas revolt, made James K. Polk win the election of 1844, and brought disagreements over the Marxian War between Polk and politicians in the North.
The expansion of slavery led to the Texas revolt, which resulted in the independence of Texas. Texas was initially a part of Mexico. Since most of its residents owned slaves, Texas felt threatened when the governor of Mexico Santa Anna used his army to encourage the abolition of slavery in the region in 1835. In order to remain slaves, Texas built its provisional government to call for its separation from the Mexico. In April 1836, the army of Texas beat Santa Anna’s army to establish the Republic of Texas, which allowed the use of slaves in Texas.
In addition, the expansion of slavery enabled James K. Polk, the supporter of Texas annexation, to win the election of 1844, which caused the resent among the Democrats in the North. After separating from Mexico, Texas requested to become a part of America. By rejecting Texas to enter in the United States as a slave state, the candidate for president from Democratic partly, Van Buren lost his support in the slave states in the South. As a result, James K. Polk, who agreed on the Texas annexation, eventually won the election of 1844. Many Democrats in the South betrayed the Northern Democrats by voting for Polk to support Texas annexation, which caused the resent among the Northern Democrats. Furthermore, the expansion of slavery brought the criticisms of the Mexican War from some Northern politicians like Abraham Lincoln. In order to seize the land from Mexico, Polk

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Controversy arouse in from the years 1793 to 1860 on a wide scale of topics regarding the Slavery as well as North and South arguments lead to impact America throughout these years. Controversy and discussion, even war, were brought about with how the topics such as how cotton developed the “Cotton Kingdom”, the aristocrats of the south, slavery and its systems, how slaves were treated, abolitionism, and the effects of antislavery on the North and South were handled. All of the topics discussed are vital parts that helped to lead the United States into Civil War in 1861.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lewis Cass 1848

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The topic of slavery caused significant division in America. This was partly due to the fact that America had recently acquired the land known as present day California, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado. Aside from that, the results of the 1846 Mexican American War also led to the annexation of Texas (Howe). With such a huge increase in land, the big question came down to whether or not slavery would be prohibited, and many in the North and South held different viewpoints on the tolerance of slavery. Slavery inevitably became the most vital influence on the outcome of presidential election of 1848.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican War certainly made the issue of slavery extremely pressing. With the acquisition of new territories during the first half of 17th century, such as The Louisiana Purchase, Oregon Country, and Kansas and Nebraska, a decision to either allow or outlaw slavery in the new territories was vital. Of course, the South urged Congress to legalize the institution it relied so heavily upon, and appropriately, vice versa occurred in the North. Such a pressing issue served one major purpose. The decision to be made tremendously publicized the issue of slavery, spreading either approval or hatred of it. Slavery was no longer something foreign and distant to Northerners; it was possible for it to spread. This was the only controversy concerning slavery the Mexican War raised, and this was the only affect on slavery the Mexican War had.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 2, 1836, Texas had become an independent nation from Mexico. It had named itself the Republic of Texas and proudly stood between a growing United States, and a conflicted Mexico. Immediately facing problems, Texas had many economic failures, had trouble with nearby Indians, and could not form a stable military. It is for these reasons that Sam Houston, a major political figure and President of the Republic of Texas, decided that Texas could not sustain itself as an independent nation. Sam Houston suggested to the United States to annex Texas. This caused a bit of disruption in the United States, as people who opposed Texas annexation and people who wanted Texas annexation clashed. Many people thought…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examining the Civil War

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages

    A war that originated because the nation was divided ultimately marked the beginning of a truly unified United States. The Civil War put to rest the increasing sectionalism that divided the North, the South, and the newly colonized West. At the root were the issues of slavery in the South, and the attempt of the Southern states to withdraw from the Union. Although many lives and untold millions were lost in personal belongings, livestock, and structures, the Civil War set in motion the progression towards a unified Nation. During the 18th and 19th century, slavery was a very significant aspect of the development of the nation. The economic, social, and political development of the nation during this period was directly associated to slavery even though society condemned it as morally wrong. The following will detail the significance of slavery in the economic, social, and political development of the 18th and 19th century America. Additionally details will show the economic, social, and political impacts of the conflict as well as why a democratic nation failed to address the crisis peacefully.…

    • 3635 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American politics from the years of 1800 to 1860 was strongly focused on the growing issue of slavery as more and more Americans were moving out west. There was much controversy about what the right action plan for slavery was. This resulted in three different Anti-Slavery movements including Gradualism, Colonization, and Abolition.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early-mid part of the 19th century (mainly 1820-1860) Americans objected many things they didn’t like. Taxes, the government, even presidents were some of the rejections of the people. But the one thing the people did not like during this time period was the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War. “The opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause for expansion.” However, slavery was not the only reason America sought for expansion. Other than slavery, people wanted to expand America because they believed in Manifest Destiny (an idea during the 19th century in which people believed that America should expand over the entirety of North America) or because they feared that Texas was an independent state, even the Gold Rush in California (1848-1855) contributed to the expansion of America. Even though “the opponents of the annexation of Texas and the Mexican War attacked slavery as the root cause of expansion” the idea of Manifest Destiny, fear, and the Gold Rush were other important causes for expansion.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 18 Ap Us History

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. The debate over slavery in the Mexican Cession threatened to split national politics along North-South lines…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beatriz Figueroa

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    - Southerners were not satisfied with the territorial gains from the Mexican War. They wanted new territories in the Latin American areas where plantations existed.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 151

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How did the war with mexico provoke a conflict over slavery many northerners believed that southerners wanted to take territory from Mexico in order to extend slavery. The United States had always been divided by sectionalism and slavery, but it steadily worsened in the years prior to the Civil War. The southern states began to not only use slavery, but try to expand it into the newly acquired territories a stricter Fugitive Slave Act, which forced northerners to accept and protect slavery. Any slave who escaped into the free territory could not be hidden or aided in any way, under penalty of law. This forced northern abolitionists to take a step back, allowing for the recapture of many southern slaves. The South was not willing to give up slavery, and the North was not…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During antebellum America there were a lot of different parties, acts, and compromises created due to slavery. This issue is what eventually led our nation to the Civil War. Although U.S. expansion during the 1850’s was not the main reason why the nation got torn apart, the increase of land was a catalyst to it. The fact that there was equilibrium in congress between the North and the South was basically the last hanging thread before war. After the conquest of Oregon territory and the land in the Southwest, however, tensions rose because there were new states coming into the Union and people were afraid that the balance of power would shift to one side or another. Due to the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, these areas were forced to figure out the status of their region, hence popular sovereignty. The notion of popular sovereignty was extremely complicated and it tore a lot of regional political groups apart. Slavery was a very controversial issue in the 1840’s, 50’s and early 60’s and it heavily impacted many political groups such as the Free Soil Party, Whig Party, and Republican Party.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1800 to 1850 territorial expansion tore the United States apart. Territorial expansion itself was not a debated issue. Spurred by the concept of Manifest Destiny, almost everyone believed that America should extend from sea to shining sea and maybe even farther. But it was the issue of the expansion of slavery into the new territories that pitted the North against the South and split our nation apart.…

    • 781 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Compromise DBQ

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rupture in the United States that the argument over slavery had made was far too deep and wide to be mended by compromises alone. During the early 1800s, Americans were optimistic about fixing the slavery issue by passing laws and bills that satisfied both the North and South, but they were proved largely ineffective. It seems that sectionalism had begun to overcome nationalism. Northerners tended to not only disagree with themselves having to comply with fugitive slave laws and with slavery being legal in new states, but also with the South being allowed to practice slavery altogether. The South demanded that Northerners help return the Souths legal, property (runaway slaves), that citizens of the South who wished to move west be allowed to bring their slaves with them, and that the North not mess with the keystone of their agricultural economy. Hostilities between the two sections were seen everywhere from Church to politics, and at such levels that made it clear that no compromise could have possibly made everyone happy.…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cause Of Sectionalism

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sectionalism relied on controversy over the institution of slavery in new territories, and thus the slavery itself was more the cause of sectionalism. New land granted after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo made the disagreement over slavery show itself, though it was still evident in the North-South religious divide over abolition caused by the Second Great Awakening. As the US took in its new Western lands, the Underground Railroad passed slaves to freedom, inflaming the North with righteous anger and enraging the South over the North's perceived theft. Californian demands for admission as a free state alarmed the South, which called for a convention in 1850 to decide whether or not to secede. Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and and Daniel Webster…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays