Preview

Why Did The Electoral College Lose The Popular Vote?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
850 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Electoral College Lose The Popular Vote?
The Constitution specifies that the President of the United States is officially elected by the votes cast by a group of people known as the Electoral College, and not by the popular vote, which are the votes directly cast by each voter. When Americans vote in November and mark their choices for President and Vice President, these citizens are actually voting for electors—people who represent our choices in the Electoral College. Although every elected official in the United States, from school committee members to U.S. senators, is elected based on the popular vote, in order to be elected, the President and Vice President must receive a minimum of 270 votes from the Electoral College.

Although Jefferson had written in the Declaration of
…show more content…
Five Presidents to date have lost the popular vote but ended up winning the electoral college. This happened to John Quincy Adams (1824), Rutherford B. Hayes (1876), Benjamin Harrison (1888), George W. Bush (2000), and most recently, Donald Trump (2016). This brings up the question of to what extent has the Electoral College accurately represented the popular vote in American elections? The electoral college was originally created because most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. In addition to Jefferson and Gerry, James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Other members of the founding fathers agreed. James Madison said that southern states “could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes.” Madison was referring the infamous “three-fifths compromise,” which allowed the South to count each black slave as three-fifths of a person. Madison, and others who agreed, wanted to keep power within the white upper class. These men did not want the popular vote to be the deciding factor because after slaves were given the right to vote the tide could turn and shift balance of power within America. This is where the electoral college keeps all power in the white upper …show more content…
Using electors instead of the popular vote was intended to safeguard against uninformed or uneducated voters by putting the final decision in the hands of electors most likely to possess the information necessary to make the best decision; to prevent states with larger populations from having a heavy influence; and to compromise between electing the president by popular vote and letting Congress choose the president. The Electoral College ensures that all parts of the country are involved in selecting the President of the United States. If the election solely used the popular vote then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions. To win the election, presidential candidates need electoral votes from multiple regions and therefore they build campaign platforms with a national focus. The Electoral College also makes sure that the president is elected. It ensures that there could never be a tie between the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College. Americans expect their presidents to get things done, to solve problems, to govern effectively, and to be strong leaders. The framers of the Constitution did not envision such presidential leadership. A scholar of the presidency points out that Article II of the Constitution gives the president scant formal power to influence congressional policy-making (Simon, n.d.). He also notes that the framers intentionally designed a process for selecting presidents that would minimize their political power – the Electoral College. They hoped this institution would insulate the chief executive from the public because they feared the power of presidents who might be elected by the people. Therefore, the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress…” Having state legislatures “appoint” the Electors who select the chief executive would minimize the president’s capacity to lead on the basis of his popular support. In a very real sense, the president would not be accountable to the people but rather to the state legislatures who appoint Electors. This procedure was also seen as a way to encourage the selection of statesmen with “characters preeminent for ability and virtue” rather than mere politicians with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” (Hamilton, 1788).…

    • 7672 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is twenty seven states have laws where the electors have to vote with majority of the people. An elector that doesn’t vote for his state is called a faithless elector which is a disgrace of loyalty and completely untrustworthy. The overall purpose of the electoral college is to the automatic winning by the highest candidate that gets the most votes. The electoral college is promising and does it’s job, but it has it’s flaws. It is most effective when the popular vote is a split decision because then the people and the candidates rely heavily on the Electoral College votes through each state. Some states give more electoral votes than others. This is so because some states have more representatives than other states.The candidates running for president have to reach 270 electoral votes before the other candidate to win the presidency. Most candidates strive for the states that supply the most electoral votes which mainly includes california who has fifty five and the second state with a…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument most used against the Electoral College is that there is a possibility for a candidate to win the popular vote and still lose the election. This has happened four times since the Electoral College went into effect. The most recent time this had happened was in the elections of 2000. Historian Rick Shenkman from George Mason University states that “there has been no aspect of what the founders worked up in Philadelphia that has received more criticism than the Electoral College.” (Dotinga, 2008) Ever since the Electoral College went into effect there have been more than 700 attempts to either abolish it completely or to drastically ratify it (Uhlmann,…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College always has it’s print on the elections and more importantly on the very close elections. It has done it’s job the over 200 plus years and throughout fifty presidential elections. So the electoral college is promising and durable. Both parties Republican and Democrat candidate feel at times as if they win the popular vote they win the election, but that’s when the electoral votes play their part. The electoral votes are combined by states…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous negative points to having the Electoral College. The Electoral College weighs the votes from smaller states more than larger ones because each state's electoral votes are equivalent to the number of House and Senate seats it has, thus giving one of those smaller state’s votes the power to really make a difference. Secondly, the Electoral College only acknowledges majority votes of the states and ignore the minority votes. Those who do not agree with everyone else are not represented at all.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another example is the 2000 election, the president candidate Al Gore won the popular vote, however, the other president candidate George W. Bush won the electoral college (Mayer). This occasions hasn’t happened recently, it also happened in the early election history three instances: 1876, 1888 and 1960 (Edwards 62). As a result of these elections, it ignores the will of the people. United States is built with democracy and it seemed that electoral college is an undemocratic system. Jonathan Chait, an American liberal commentator and writer for New York magazine, argues that “the electoral college failed to mention the most egregious aspect of the process: it subverts democracy. It makes an utter mockery of the principle of one man, one vote.,” (“Electoral College, Pros”). It questions if the Electoral College favors the people at…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College is a process that involves the electors and the congress they meet to vote for the president and vice president. The Electoral College has five hundred thirty eight electors. Out of those five hundred thirty eight electors, only two hundred seventy are required to elect the president. Each state has their own group of electors. People help choose their electoral vote when they choose their candidate. Each candidate has a group of electors before you even vote for them. “Winner-Take-All” is an award of all electors to the winning presidential candidate. When the presidential election is over your governor gives a Certificate of Ascertainment saying all of the candidates who ran for your president in your state also with the electors as well. The certificate that the governor gives also announces who won your state as president and it shows which electors will be representing your state at the meeting of the electors in…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolish Electoral College

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The electoral college is a group of people chosen by every state who officially elects the president and vice president of the united states. The electoral college started with the constitution of the united states, it cited how many electors each state is able to have. Since 1964 the has been 538 electors in each presidential election. The number of electors is equivalent to the entire membership of the united states congress, 435 representatives, 100 senators, and 3 electors from the district of Columbia. The democratic candidate and the republican candidate are both trying to add up the electors in every state so that they beat 270 electoral votes, or just over half of 538 votes and achieve presidency.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College follows a winner-take all representative system, which means that the voices of some citizens will not matter. The Electoral College is a system of representatives included in the U.S. Constitution, created by the Founding Fathers, to help ensure that voters selecting the president were qualified and knowledgeable. These voters were chosen, because they knew what they were doing, rather than possible unreasonable voting by the public. However, this system is not required anymore, and can be detrimental to citizens of the United States of America. The Electoral College should be abolished, because it favors’ the voters of small states and because it does not accurately represent the voice of the people of the U.S.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest advantages of the Electoral College is the firm political stability it provides the nation by encouraging the two-party system. (Kimberling, n.d.) Without the two-party system, votes would be splintered among many candidates and would result in constant recounts and mass confusion. In this way, the system is very transparent and greatly aids in reaching a majority. The College also contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. Therefore, it is impossible for one region to hold the absolute majority of required electoral votes. Without this mechanism in place, it is possible that the president would be selected either through the denomination of one populous region over the others, or through the denomination of large metropolitan areas over the rural ones. (Kimberling, n.d.) Another great advantage offered by the College is the enhancement of the status of minority groups. This makes it possible for voters of small minorities, be they ethnic minorities or labor unions, in any given state to make the difference between winning all or none of a state’s electoral votes. (Kimberling, n.d.) Finally, it encourages candidates to view the country as a whole and can offer the framework for establishing and organizing campaigns. (apecsec.org,…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays