Preview

Why Did Max Considder the Proletarians to Be the Only True Revolutionary Class?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1065 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Max Considder the Proletarians to Be the Only True Revolutionary Class?
Why did Karl Marx regard the working class to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism?
By Kevin O ' Connor

"Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!"- Communist Manifesto Chapter 4 (Ref. 1)

In the communist manifesto, Marx divides society into two main classes, the bourgeoisie, who are the owners of the means of production and employers of wage labourers, and the wage labourers themselves, the proletariat working class. The bourgeoisie, he claims, by their very capitalist nature, exploit the proletariat workers by unfairly controlling the wealth and means of production, thus forcing the proletarians to sell their only real asset, their labour in order to survive. Marx then goes on to argue that the proletarians must revolt against the capitalist society that treats them so unjustly in order to equally distribute the wealth and power. He reinforces this by saying, "Not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-the modern working class-the proletarians." (Ref. 2) and "Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product."(Ref 3) These statements would indicate that Marx regarded the proletarians to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism. But why does Marx regard them in this way? The bourgeoisie, as Marx has described them are not revolutionary simply because it is in their best interest for things to remain as they are. For the workers, both socially and geographically divided; a gap that is constantly fluctuating in modern times, to compete for smaller and smaller wages that are losing their



References: 1. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch04.htm 2. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm 3. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm - a2 4. http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html 5. Ibid. (All above sites are merely online reproductions of The Communist Manifesto.)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his book, “Communist Manifesto,” Marx stresses the importance of communism or the publication of private property. As stated above, John Locke was the influencer of human basic rights, which included the right to own private property. The development of the Capitalist soon came after this right was made. Capitalists were key contributors to the rise of the industrial revolution but also to the fall of small shop owners. These shop owners were without income and the only way to provide a source was by working for these wealthy owners. A clear distinction between these two types people was their level of income and property which brought on the social classes. There was an oppressor and the oppressed. Before I go further with any explanations, this picture here of classes shows that only one class is progressing. The oppressor is the class that prospers in context of human progression through technological advancements. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other- bourgeoisie and proletariat (Marx 9).” The bourgeoisie were the capitalist while the proletariat was the lower working class. Separation between the two came along with the industrial revolution. Romanticist like Marx would oppose this as human progression because as a whole we aren’t all included in this promotion. It seems as the Capitalists are being set up on a pedestal…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Inequality Exam

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. In what way can one argue that the bourgeoisie is a revolutionary class in more than one sense in Marx’s theory of classes?…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution around the 18th and early 19th centuries, Karl Marx (the founder of communism) analyzed the conflict which he strongly believed exists between the Bourgeoisie (Upper-Middle Class) and Proletariat (Lower Class). Marx was against capitalistic views because in his perspective, such a system of society only meant that the privileged groups would exploit the sub-ordinate groups and this would result in a massive class-inequality. Moreover, that the rich would keep getting richer and the poor would remain getting poorer. In society, mankind will have lost its appreciation for equality and human welfare. Taxation or any other methods will be of no use because it does not guarantee a Lower-Class citizen a better position in employment, education, or wealth. But, merely provides them enough wages so that they may hold themselves in place. Marx believed that in order to eliminate class-struggle and inequality would mean to eliminate capitalism as a whole and resort to the ways of socialism which would eventually, lead to…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The proletariat was defined by Marx as, “a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The basic thought running through the manifesto is that all history has been a history of class struggles between the exploited and exploiting, between dominated and dominating classes at different stages of social evolution. (Slavery, Feudalism, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism). This struggle, however, is believed to have reached a stage where the exploited and oppressed class (the proletariat) can no longer liberate itself from the bourgeoisie. This thought belongs to Marx and Marx only as we've learned.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Moore

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx perceives society made up as two classes, the powerful and exploitive higher class known as the bourgeoisie and the industrial wage earners that must earn their living by selling their labor known as the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is known as the private property owners and the proletariat works for the bourgeoisie. There is an inequality between these two classes because the bourgeoisie takes advantage of the proletariat by having them work in order to live. Marx believes that what make us human are our productive and creative abilities and when the proletariat works, they lose individual character because they are working for their lives. This causes the proletariat to be alienated while the bourgeoisie capitalist basically sits back and uses the proletariat’s work to its full advantage.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The core argument of this essay is that according to Marx, class struggle and the “march of history” will inevitably lead to the demise of the bourgeoisie…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx, philosopher, theorist and sociologist, had very controversial ideologies. His divergent views towards social class and capitalism ultimately lead to his banishment from countries like Germany and France. Marx believed that there are only two classes in society: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He strongly argued that these two categories influence individuals’ life chances and outlooks. Marx saw capitalism as a mostly negative system in which the proletariats work for the benefit of the bourgeoisie. In other words, wage-workers are of value to the bourgeoisie because they are essentially commodities. Given this perspective on capitalism it is quite interesting that more people do not share this same view, especially those who…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Communism; the final epoch. where the proletariat overthrow the bourgeoisie, true communism emerges. Within this system, the means of production are owned equally by everyone, wealth and power is no longer concentrated in the hands of the few, everyone has an equal stake in society and no one is exploited.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx’s theory of class struggle originates with his belief that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx & Engel, 1848). Marx had established that conflict between classes was the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social change. For Marx, conflict originates with the deterioration of a ‘false consciousness’ and the subsequent acquisition of a unified ‘class consciousness’. Marx argued that that proletariat was under the influence of a ‘false consciousness’ brought about with the acceptance of the dominant ideology that freedom and equality could be interpreted as an equal exchange of labour for wages (van Krieken et al., 2010). Marx however, perceived this as an exploitive relationship because in capitalism, the labourer only receives what is deemed sufficient to meet his basic needs for himself and his family, as opposed to the real value of his…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proletariat or working class, is the second class in modern society formations, according to Marx. Deprived of the opportunity to produce their own livelihoods, they were forced to sell all they possess, their labor, in order to survive. According to Marx, the relationship between these classes both that they were dependent on each other and hostile to each other. Workers needed for the bourgeoisie to find them work, and the bourgeoisie needed workers for a profit. But the relationship was an inherent conflict because of the exploitative nature of these financial arrangements contained (Bradley, 2006: 135).…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Manifesto states it is economic system, which generates the necessities of life and livelihood, that determines class stratification and non-equitable distribution of resources in the society. And it is this very economic system that further impacts the political and intellectual history of that age. It is the strife and tussle between the exploited ,the working class and exploiting ,the bourgeoisie , or the ruling and oppressed social classes that create that ‘history’ of the age. Based upon these principles of his philosophy Marx brings home the inference or rather conclusion that only the working class can initiate a revolution and over throw the ‘high browed’ bourgeoisie or the capitalist, who exploit them. And this revolution would someday create a classless society where everyone is equal and there is no hierarchical set up and for certainty no human being will ever show supremacy upon any other human being in any aspect.…

    • 6263 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German social theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the politics, culture and economics of the newly emerging nations within Europe. He emphasized the leading role of the economy in society as a whole as well as in societal parts, known as superstructures. These superstructures are non-economic aspects of society, i.e. culture, religion, social life, education, religion, politics and social institutions. Marx identified society as consisting of two classes: The so-called Bourgeoisie and the so-called Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie is a capitalistic, wealthy and powerful minority consisting of aristocracy and upper class members meanwhile the Proletariat, also known as working-class, holds the majority of societal members who are poor, semi- or unskilled workers. The Bourgeoisie owns…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1848 Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto which was a formal statement of the communist party. ?The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles [?] we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold graduation of social rank? (Cohen and Fermon, 448). Marx believed that throughout the past the great societies of the world have all experienced class struggle in all their internal conflict. Marx felt that the class struggle that exists in capitalism would become the main internal conflict surpassing all other struggles. Marx illustrated class distinctions in both ancient history and modern history. Marx explained, ?In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, (and) slaves; in the middle ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild masters, journeymen, and apprentices? (Cohen and Fermon, 448). Marx makes this point to show that if a knight fought a slave then it was a class struggle, the oppressor vs. the oppressed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays