Preview

Why Did Cicero Deserve To Exile

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1188 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Cicero Deserve To Exile
To what extent do you think Cicero deserved to be exiled in 58 BC?

In the build up to Cicero’s exile, he undoubtedly had many chances to escape the fate he eventually found himself in, this, it has to be said, was ultimately down to Cloudius whom Cicero found an enemy in when he gave evidence against him in the ‘bona dea’ scandal. However Cicero was not all to blame as he found himself abandoned by close friends such as Pompey, and the subject in which he was exiled over (putting the Cataline conspirators to death without trial) was greatly supported at the time he proposed it, so how was he supposed to know that the support would be non-existent in the future? Overall however, I feel Cicero had plenty of chances to save himself from exile
…show more content…
They wanted Cicero to join due to the fact that he was a fantastic orator (in fact one of the great of his time) and also he is an ex-consul meaning he is highly respected. However he rejects these offers, including joining Caesars staff and going on a mission, as joining them would be against his political morals (Concordia ordinum). His strong sense of morals is what ultimately costs him though, as because the Triumvirate became frustrated with waiting and saw Cicero as a threat due to his skill in speech. They therefore started to support Cloudius, they let him be adopted as a plebeian so he could run as tribune, (and he changed his name from Claudius to Cloudius as it was more plebeian) and when he proposed that all People who had put Roman citizens to death without trial should be exiled, which was obviously aimed at Cicero they supported it. This made Cicero call to Pompey, however Pompey said he was merely a private citizen who had no influence over Cloudius, Pompey also had little sympathy for Cicero as he had turned down all Caesar’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Having his fiercest rival run out of town and later killed helped strengthen Cicero's position within the government which allowed him to bring together the equestrians and senators to work on the republican constitution. Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus formed…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A legal voting was not followed in any way. His ability and power to establish himself as a dictator were so strong that not only he ingrained himself as a dictator, but did so indefinitely until he wanted to. However, at the time he felt he had made the changes that needed to be made, he did resign as dictator, which is what causes so many controversies among the people. Because his actions show two different perspectives, one, his honesty and intentions of truly changing the way Rome was being led at any cost, and the other the man who wanted to be a “reformer” but ended up being a “dictator.” In addition, I believe that by taking Rome by force he also set an example for future generations, one that he will not be able to “abolish.” (Badian, 1) He awoke in others this feeling that if Sulla did it why can’t I?. As a result, I believe it is just a matter of time before someone else tries to establish himself as a tyrant as well. However, I don’t believe that future dictators will have the same idea of resigning to such power as Sulla did, which could represent a real chaos for the…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Sextus Roscius trial was significant with regard to gay strategies Cicero used in many of his subsequent law cases as a lawyer. An example of one strategy Cicero incorporated into his defending speech was “cui bono”, which translates to “who profits”. However, this trial is also significant on a broader scale because it could largely be seen as gay defining trial which led to gay unprecedented career of Cicero where failure in place of success in this specific trial could have potentially led to political disaster as well as destroying his character and family name.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 is a description of the Republic of Rome from Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 - 43 BC). Cicero was a writer and philosopher who is famous for his vast collection of private letters to various individuals, such as Titus Pomponius Atticus to whom he wrote to without fear about every day Rome and it's politics.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he was convinced to join the. Other senators in a conspiracy to kill Caesar. The people had the fear of Caesar gaining overall power after his vow as “dictator for life”.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cicero’s De Officiis, one should embrace his gifts from nature rather than envy other for theirs, i.e. an artist is better off perfecting his artistic talent than studying law. He also argues that fraud is the worst form of injustice, that is, the one who “practice[s] fraud to the utmost ability [to] do it in such a way that [he] appear[s] to be [a] good m[a]n (I.13). Although Cicero condemns fraud for obvious reasons, such as, corruption, is one unjust for using this gift against the enemy?—more so, what if one uses the gift of fraudulency, ((that is to say, a trained spy)) to do good for the community? The answer to those questions is no because Cicero’s argument on fraud and justice overlap in that scenario. For example, one…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Rome did not all share the same viewpoint as Brutus. It is clear that Commoners such as the Carpenter and Cobbler support Caesar’s rule when they disagree with soldiers on the street. The soldiers dislike Caesar because he killed Pompey, while the common people support him. These Commoners did not want Caesar to be dethroned. In addition, Brutus had to work to persuade the people that he made the right decision in killing Caesar. He gave a speech at Caesar’s funeral attempting to explain that his motives were solely for Rome. The only way for him to make the Plebeians take his side was by convincing them that if they did not support him, they were not true Romans. If Brutus truly did what was right for Rome, he would not have to convince everyone that his intentions were pure because they would already understand. Further evidence of the people’s love of Caesar can be found when Mark Antony reads Caesar’s will at the funeral. Upon being part of the will, the Plebeians cry out, “Most noble Caesar! We’ll revenge his death” (3.2.257). They did not want their leader to die; they believed he had their best interests at heart. Though Caesar did not leave much for the common people, the fact that he included them in his will indicates that he always thought of his people. If the Plebeians loved Caesar and he constantly thought about the needs of his people, then why would Brutus kill him for being a bad…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The hit list was set as the Second Triumvirate rose to its power of a three man dictatorship to hold power over Rome. The select three, Octavian, Antony and Lepidus, had handpicked the group that was to face punishment for speaking out against them. Among this group of the damned, an orator named Cicero stood proudly. Previously having spoken out against Caesar for fear of the loss of liberty, this great speaker felt the need to call out Antony on the same charge. As the Second Triumvirate rose in Rome, it was determined that Cicero would die. While he potentially could have escaped, it was with courage and dignity that he perished at the hands of Antony’s men in the year 43 BCE. (Everett) However, while an exciting part of his life, Cicero was known for much more than his death at the hands of this new regime. Aside from being a well-known orator, he was involved in politics and literature of the time which placed him in the center of Roman life. Cicero was a monumental figure of his time, and even though he came from somewhat humble beginnings, he ultimately became one of the largest impacts on Rome that can still be seen today.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gaius Marius

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Then serving in Africa in the wars against Jughurta, the roman forces were not successful so in 108BC Marius returned to Rome and stood for the office of Consul where he won the election.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were many things that could have held him back from doing what needed to be done in Rome. Donald McGannon states “leadership is an action, not a position”, and that is what great leaders such as, Gaius Julius Caesar did. Instead of sitting back and governing from a seat like many leaders of today, he took ask and initiated different wars, treaties, reforms and etc but in the end, left a lasting legacy that has impacted generations well over the last 2000 years and will continue to. He may not have always been loved but he was definitely respected by many and imitated in order to leave such a great an impact as…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the trial of brutus

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our beloved Caesar was shredded from this world by the daggers of hatred and it was Marcus Brutus, who claimed to love the man that led to this tragic murder. Brutus and the conspirators begged that Caesar was killed for the greater good of Rome, and for the benefit of the people, but Caesar was beloved by all. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (3.2.23) ; being viewed as a noble man among the Roman people proved to be more important to Brutus than to be a good man to someone who he had called his friend.. They were all simply jealous men who could not stand to continue to be overshadowed by the light of greater men’s triumphs. He would never continue the cruelty shown by Rome’s first ruler whom we so feared and hated; there was no reason for Caesar to die. Caesar had owned all of his accolades and was punished for doing so. He was a strong man, becoming the head of his house at age 16, being ousted from the country by Sulla, being captured by pirates and later crucifying them after his release. “I could be well moved, if I were as you; “If I could pray to move, prayers would move me but I am constant as the Northern Star, Of whose true-fixed and resting quality / There is no fellow in the firmament.” (3,1, 63). Caesar expresses how he would be a stable leader for the Romans. He has gone through the trials of war and exile and emerged a stronger man. Caesar has suffered through his life, and to be betrayed by those he trusted is worse than the pain he suffered in death. Although Brutus stands at trial this day it should be noted that he did not act alone. Numerous members of the senate were involved in this heinous act and should be met with the same fate that should happen Brutus; namely the manipulative Gaius Cassius Longinus. These men were meant to serve the republic and the glory of Rome, yet shamed it by staining the floor of the senate with the blood of Rome’s favored son. Caesar gave numerous political reforms and was beloved by his…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero had not fully accepted Sthenius’s request before Verres had another summon for trial on spying against Sthenius. Cicero had managed to get Verres father to send Verres a letter asking him to stop the charges against Sthenius. Sadly the letter did not work and Verres found Sthenius guilty and sentenced him to be crucified. Cicero had no other ideas for Sthenius other than to commit suicide or to approach the tribunes. Neither…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus is blameless because he killed an authoritarian, Caesar, who was only poisonous to Rome. Brutus had no other option but to do the utmost for the citizens of Rome. Caesar would have possessed all of Rome and enslaved all the people who loved adored and admired him.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We also found Publius fleeing from the scene he had this to say on the matter,”I was frozen with fear as the conspirators walked past me as I stood anchored to my spot on the ground the told me I had nothing to fear. That only Caesar had to pay for his ambition, with this relief I was uprooted from the marble floor and raced from the scene.”…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays