However, despite its flaws, it has been argued that Emancipation was a moral improvement. M.S. Andersen claims that “the grant of individual freedom and minimum of civil rights to twenty million people previously in bondage was the single greatest liberating measure in the whole history of Europe”. Alexander II has thus also been …show more content…
The abolition of the legal and judicial control of the gentry over their serfs required a new system of local government. Rural district and provisional assemblies known as the Zemstva were established. Their functions included the administration of primary education, public health, local industry and the maintenance of infrastructure. Alexander II understood that improving the living conditions of the peasants decreased the risk of widespread unrest. However he also saw these Zemstva as props for the autocracy and they were not truly democratic. The vote weighed more heavily in favour of local landlords making it easy for the conservative nobility to dominate these