Critics of student athlete privileges suggest that colleges should put education first and by giving athletes “preferential treatment,” it violates the sole purpose of the institution. The schools with attendance policies have a requirement for regular students to be in class a certain amount of time. However, athletes are exempted from those requirements. According to Amy Perko, an academic reform advocate at Knights Commission, her commission has “consistently recommended that athletes be mainstreamed into the same academic requirements other students are subject to, so that athletes be subject to the same admission policy and criteria as other students.” (Schrotenboer1). Some universities have students called “special admits.” These are students accepted into universities even though their grades or test scores do not meet academic admission standards. These students are admitted solely for their academic ability.
Many people have mixed emotions on the issue of whether college athletes should attend class or not. A lot of people feel that the main reason for college is to get an education. It is often forgotten that players are student athletes and need to be attentive in the classroom. If athletes get behind in class, it makes it extremely difficult to keep up the grades that are required to be on a sports team, and it may also affect how the class is proceeding.
A good number of students choose to partake in some sort of activity, whether it is a hobby, a sport not associated with school, or a sport that is associated with school. Just because a student participates in a time-consuming sport for their school, does not mean that other students do not participate in other time-consuming activities. Some feel it is an unfair advantage for professors to extend the due date of an athlete’s homework because they have a game that night. If professors do that for the athletes, the other students who enact themselves in other activities should expect to get extensions on their assignments as well. The athletes that receive extensions on their assignments because of competitions, whether they take advantage of this or not, will fall behind the others in class. However, these athletes should not receive any special treatment because they chose to do a sport they knew would take a lot of time.
The NCAA passed a major reform deciding to give more money in scholarships by increasing the total amount per student by $2,000. The NCAA also passed new rules to increase the requirements of a schools Academic Progress Rate to be eligible for post season play. Last fall the NCAA reguired student athletes to complete 16 core level courses in high school. The new requirements are intended to help high school students transition into college. For athletes to be eligible to play all incoming student athletes are required to meet the minimum academic criteria by the NCAA- grades and test scores.
However, many schools also have their own admission standards which can be much harder then NCAA’s. The rule measures the academics of a certain program using the “Academic Progress Rate” (APR) of each school. The APR is a system that measures how well college athletic teams move student athletes toward graduation from the institution. The NCAA Board of Directors brought about this change in order to improve the performance academic wise of the college student. The new rule states that a school must have an average APR of 930 out of 1,000 over the past two seasons, or a four year average of 900 in order to participate in 2012-2013 post season. The new regulation prevents students from slacking off in class without consequences. The new regulation forces the student athletes to maintiain their school work in order to get an post season play.
Some universities already feel the pressure from the newly passed rule. What this rule hopes to do is push the athletes to succeed in their studies no matter what their plans for the future are. The increase also pushes the students to do bettering the classroom and reprimands those students who do not make an effort to graduate. This new program is definitely a move towards the right direction. Driving students in the classroom is one of the best ways for them to obtain academic excellence. As students they know how easy it is to fall behind on their studies. When professors set rules on attendance and give mandatory work outside of class time, it encourages students to learn more and stay caught up in class.
Some universities feel that now students execute themselves in a classroom, will affect a coach’s declaration about a prized recruit. The universities are going to have to decide between taking a five-star athlete with undefined athletic ability against a three-star athlete who they know will matriculate through school. A state official from Colorado State declares that all of their students, including athletes, meet their minimum standards for enrollment. Even though most athletes get a scholarship to ensure a free education, they have to ensure their academic ability in order to show off their athletic ability. This is true even if most four-year schools only require an SAT score of 900 to apply.
On the con side of the argument, college coaches have been said not to push their players in the classroom enough to the point that they do not need to go tto be accepted to class. People advocating on behalf of athletes believe that these students also be paid for their contributions on the playing field. However, instead of the athletes being paid, the students get a free education. Teachers are expected to make special arrangements for students who miss work and exams because of competition. Student athletes may get free books and enhanced food programs as well. Many schools offer special tutoring to athletes to help them earn their grades that guarantee eligibility to play. These athletes also get access to early registration to choose classes that will not interfere with athletics. They may be subject to lower admission standards than people that do not compete.
From the start of the process of applying for college allowances are offered to students who show potential in athletics. If athletes are given special treatment to be accepted into school, the school is getting something out of it; or so they think. While the institution may be giving away something of value, the athlete who is completely not qualified to attend the school is not getting anything of value.
College football players have to waste time attending courses they do not understand, in exchange for a degree that will not do them any good.