Preview

Why Are Atomic Bombs Morally Justified

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
62 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Are Atomic Bombs Morally Justified
I feel that they were not morally justified because the atomic bombs were extremely horrific. The bombings killed so many lives of innocent people and the horrible effects on the people for years after the bombing. The after effects of the bombing have caused health problems such as cancer and birth defects for decades later to people that weren’t even born yet.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Pearl Harbor Bombing
    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Pearl Harbor Bombing

    The bomb caused great destruction to thousands of innocent lives. The bomb created a whole other problem, that could’ve been substituted with another weapon, that not as deadly. Bombs came with pros and cons, the bombs meant for people and those who have nothing to do with any incident. Overall the bombs were pure cruel.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is America Justified Dbq
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is America Justified Dbq

    America was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan during World War Two because they didn't want to lose any more American lives. These American lives are major values to their loved ones.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    They in my opinion should have restricted the bombing to the opposing soldiers and not killed civilians. The retaliation mentality that they had created the illusion that killing thousands upon thousands of people would equalize what had happened on Pearl Harbor and is a reasonable response. There were fatalities of both parties that should never have happened. The phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right” is true for this situation. Can we really rationalize the murders of all the people in world war two? Everyone’s lives that were lost from both sides didn't have to die.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagsaki Pros and Cons
    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagsaki Pros and Cons

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Were the Atomic Bombs Used in World War II Justified?
    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Were the Atomic Bombs Used in World War II Justified?

    McLaughlin, John J. “The Bomb Was Not Necessary.” History News Network (2010). Database. Web. 25 April 2014.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Four Arguments For The Ethical Use Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Four Arguments For The Ethical Use Of The Atomic Bomb

    Then the question of the ethical use of the bomb emerged. Many scholars agreed that “it is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and that Truman and his advisers knew it.” Men like Barton J. Bernstein began to counter many arguments for the use of the atomic bomb, including using the bomb to intimidate Russia. https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htmHowever, the Truman was given four alternatives which included conventional bombing of the Japanese home islands, ground invasion of the Japanese home islands, and demonstration of the Atomic Bomb on an unpopulated/populated area. Moreover, Japan would have collapsed before the invasion due to its internal problems of political, military, and the economy.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs

    How could anyone possibly justify a decision that would result in over 265,000 potentially innocent people losing their lives? Justifications like this have been made throughout history by evil leaders with mal-intentions, or by psychopathic fundamentalists, but never by a governmental organization as respected and trusted as the United States. How is it possible that the most financially and socially developed country in the world is not asked to apologize for taking the lives of thousands of civilians? When reflecting on this decision made by the United States, there are a few factors worth mentioning. The first is the animosity held by the US not only against Japan but the axis powers in general, the strong desire to conclude a very painful time in world history, and the United States desire to become heroic. Although I do not know the specific thought processes and or actions that took place during this difficult time, I do have the ability to gather facts and attempt to recreate a simulation of what took place.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    “Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principals of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.” - Bernard M Baruch. There were two atomic bombs that were dropped during World War II. There were few survivors after the atomic bombs were dropped. Both of the atom bombs had nicknames. They were dropped three days apart from each other. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The second was dropped on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs are what ended the war.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    As barbaric as the atomic bomb was, the opposing argument would point out that “the face of war is the face of death...the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” (Document 3). It’s true that death is inevitable during war time, but over one hundred thousand Japanese deaths is excessive, especially when many were civilian deaths. Although the atomic bomb did bring an end to the war in the Pacific, “the Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender” (Document 2). The bombing was unnecessary, and an excessive use of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More