Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why and What society - Karl Marx

Good Essays
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why and What society - Karl Marx
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels explain why and what the society is based on a materialistic approach. The cornerstone of Marx’s idea is the historical materialism which highlighted the importance of economic life so that people produce their own means of subsistence to satisfy their own material needs. Besides, Marx believed that the driving force of the historical change was the dialectic, which is a process of interaction between competing forces. Historical change is the result of internal contradictions caused by class antagonism within the mode of production.

According to Marx, the central contradiction is the existence of private property. Since there are wide range of needs, there are different roles to satisfy those needs, and thus division of labour is needed and this causes the emergence of private property. This creates a division between the bourgeoisie who are the owners of the mode of production and the proletariat who do not own property and thus subsist through selling their labour force. Under capitalism, labour is merely a commodity and work becomes a depersonalized activity. Therefore, workers are alienated.

There is a conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat because capitalist profit is ultimately derived from the exploitation of the worker. Capitalism is therefore inherently unstable due to the proletariat cannot be permanent reconciled to exploitation and oppression. Thus, Marx predicted that workers would overthrow the rule of capitalist and establish a classless society.

Marx’s idea is useful to explain the proceeding historical process through the modes of production and characterized by class struggle. Besides, it is useful to explain the current phenomenon in Hong Kong which is the hostility towards the rich and class polarization. It is unavoidable and inescapable that the means to subsistence, from electricity to telecommunications, from real estate to retail, from shipping to the Internet, are closely related to the developers’ business in Hong Kong, The developer lower their wages which never rise far above the subsistence level. The wealth gap between capitalists and workers is widening. As a result, there is a tendency for the poor to increase in size and to experience relative poverty and for the rich to experience more proportion of wealth.

Under Marx’s prediction, Hong Kong people seems no longer tolerate and thus overthrow capitalism. But, it never happens in the reality. I think Marx underestimated the power of capitalist ideology. The capitalist using powerful ideological state apparatus such as schools, media, and legal institutions to shape people’s mentality, values and beliefs. The bourgeoisie not only possess economic power through the ownership of wealth, but also exercise the political power through the agency of the state.

Besides, the rise of stockholding companies makes everyone can be an owner theoretically by holding stocks of a company and the emergence of collective bargaining can be regarded as the compromise solution to the class conflicts between workers and capitalists. Under the rationale of getting something rather none and the uncertainty of a classless society, workers are willing to maintain in the status quo.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alex De Tocqueville Analysis

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels are well known for their contributions to socio-economics which was displayed in their writing of The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels wanted society to establish a classless system in which the proletariat would rise up over the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie represented the ruling class which had been established as a result of the failed system of feudalism in the 1800s. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie could rule only so long as it best represented the economically productive forces of society and that when it ceased to do so it would be destroyed and replaced and eventually this cycle would continue until there was a virtually classless society. In his writing Marx argues that the proletariat needs to overtake the bourgeoisie by means of a social revolution. He believes that due to Industrialism the proletariats have learned how to work together and will thus untie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The proletariats had become the productive class, even though they…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed that control in society was held by elite and economically-powerful groups who maintained social order for as long as it suited their own interests. However, this social dominance would eventually lead to a crisis point where the "exploited" (the working class) would challenge the "exploiting" (the elite groups) and the existing social order. It is at this point that conflict between the classes becomes the mechanism for social transformation. According to Marx, this class conflict would eventually lead to both the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of a communist society.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society there is a class divide between the wealthiest one percent of the population and the poorer ninety-nine percent. Therefore, Marx believes this economic division is a result of the law reflecting the interests of the dominant class, rather than the general interests of…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They compare the bourgeoisie to a sorcerer who has lost his grip on the powers he once commanded, unable to control the consequences of his actions. It gives the impression of an unstable class system tenuously clinging to a doomed economic market, which seems to imply that there was a true sense of hope of toppling the social hierarchy. To a modern reader, Marx seems either incredibly hopeful or somewhat naive to underestimate the impact of capitalism on the world. His reliance on the inevitability of socialism indicates that the true implications of capitalism were not yet clear during his time, or perhaps shows the strength of the people’s desperation political, social, and economic equality. The Communist dream of a highly centralized community free of social hierarchy or private property emerged directly as a result from the divisive class system of the time period.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The bourgeoisie, as the dominant class of capitalists, subjugates the proletariat by using it as an object for the expansion of capital. As capitalism progresses, this subjugation reduces a larger portion of the population to the proletariat and society becomes more polarized. According to Marx, the polarization of society and the intense oppression of the proletariat will eventually lead to a revolution by the proletariat, in which the control of the bourgeoisie will be…

    • 1112 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This exploitation results in the workers alienation – a feeling of powerlessness and estrangement from other people and from oneself. Marx predicted that the working class would become aware of its exploitation, overthrow the capitalists, and establish a free and classless society” (Kendall, 2017). This quote explains the Marxist position on capitalism perfectly because it was his belief that the capitalism controls the poor workers and pays them less, even though that they work hard day to day just to live. To understand Marx’s conflict perspective one must know what conflict perspective means; “ the sociological approach that views groups in society as engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources” (Kendall 2017). Marx’s conflict perspective which has three branches: the Neo-Marxist, which says that the struggle between classes is inventible. The second class which is focused on racial and ethnic inequalities. The third class is the feminist view, which focuses on gender issues. These three branches are all reasons why Marx’s argument is put in the conflict perspective because they are all fighting for justice in places where there is a struggle to gain…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays