Preview

why alexander III introduced reactionary policy after 1881

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
why alexander III introduced reactionary policy after 1881
Explain why Alexander III introduced reactionary policies after 1881. (12)

The years leading up to 1881 were fraught with political opposition and threats of revolution. The autocracy was being threatened and publicly questioned by groups such as groups of student radicals like ‘the Organisation’. They used their highly intellectualised reasoning to try and mould the public opinion to accept rebellion. From 1860, students offered high level unrest and eventually die to the unrest, Russian educated society was divided. Alexander needed to filter the education system to get rid of radicals through reaction and to do so in 1887 he passed a decree to prevent social mobility. In this, he intensified class discrimination by quadrupling secondary education and university fees. This was done to control the educated populace so that they remained loyal and unthreatening towards the Tsar. Also, there was a tightening of the syllabus, some subjects were prohibited and there was a stress on religion and tradition throughout the education system. Alexander hoped that through this reaction, the only people educated highly enough to threaten his reign would be rich nobles who are by necessity already loyal to him.

Alexander was a fierce nationalist chauvinist and partially blamed Russia’s problems on the national minorities living in his country- he was also highly influenced by Pobedonostev who came up with the slogan, ‘Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Nationality’ thus showing his feelings towards migrants. These feelings had been intensified by the 1863 rebellion in Poland, giving the Alexander reason to believe that non-Russian people in Russia were a danger to the empire, giving rise to the policy of Russification. Due to Alexander’s lack of intelligence, he was easily influenced and manipulated by Pobedonostev who continually suggested ways to oppress minorities like the Jews and the Poles.

In conclusion, Alexander III introduced reactionary policies to preserve his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Much like those in Germany, Russian Jews benefited from new freedoms granted in the mid-1800s. Over time they were supplied with the opportunity’s to hold middle-class occupations like business ownership, banking, teaching and manufacturing. This however was met with anger from some non-Jewish Russians, however violence was not used. Sadly, the situation for Russian Jews worsened considerably after the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881. Alexander had been of great assistance to the Jews, with some of his reforms improving conditions for Russia’s Jews. It was found Alexander was murdered by socialist revolutionaries, however many Russians considered socialism and anarchism to be Jewish inventions –therefore meaning the Russian Jews…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing that had changed in Russia from when Alexander had come into power in 1881 was that there was increased repression regarding politics. The Statue of State Security was introduced which brought government-controlled courts into the country and could now put on trial political opponents and they could also be arrested too without the need of a jury. This shows change as a lot harsher punishments were introduced that could be imposed on opponents of the government such as being sent to and exiled in Siberia and being hunted down by the Okhrana – Russia’s secret police. Although there was repression of political opponents before Alexander III’s reign, the punishment wasn’t as harsh and the violence that was encouraged by extremist groups was a lot more widespread and happened regularly compared to when Alexander III had introduced the Statue of State Security where attacks were something that didn’t happen as often. Therefore, it contributes to the idea that Russia was unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Tsar or the worlds biggest country, Alexander III had a big challenge ahead of him to keep the Empire together, so he began Russification where he ruled over his multi ethic empire. To help bring unity to this massive empire, everyone was made to use the Russian language and to use the Russian Orthodox Religion. This created a lot of uproar within the Empire, as many couldn’t speak Russian. It took 4 years for Russian to become to official language of the empire. With everything having to be Russian, all official documents had to be written in Russian, all education in schools had to be Russian. This badly affected Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. All of the Jewish communities were persecuted as Alexander III blamed them for the assassination of his father. Over 600 anti-Jewish measured were introduced; for example, only a certain number of Jews were allowed to attend university. Most fled to either USA or Western Europe. The Russification policy was not successful and later led to resentment.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as this, Universities came under Government control. This meant that University students could not spread anti-Tsarist ideas as they were brainwashed that Tsarism was the best. In 1881, Pobedonestev enforced orthodoxy, this together with the censorship of many newspapers prevented the spread of anti-Tsarist ideas and ideals of democracy failed to reach people in Russia. An example of this is that Herzen’s book ‘The Bell’ was banned in Russia due to its anti-Tsarist ideas but was still smuggled in.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alexander III was a huge supporter of Russian nationalism and he reversed many of the liberal approaches started by his father. Alexander III treated the Jews very differently that his father did and more like his grandfather Nicholas I. He encouraged the persecution of non-Russians and was particularly hard on the Jews. Russians at the time were extremely hostile towards the Jews because they were suspected of killed the previous Czar, Alexander II ("ALEXANDER III.ALEXANDROVICH, Emperor of Russia:."). In May 1882 Alexander III’s administration created the May Laws, which restricted the rights of the Jews in Russia. Jews were no longer allowed to live outside of their shtetls, they lost all their property outside of the shtetls, and were no longer allowed to do business on Shabbat (Friedman). This put the Jews in much harsher conditions than they were under Czar Alexander II because it cancelled all the things he had done for them ("Ece/ alexander-III."). During his years as the ruler of Russian Alexander III organized many pogroms against the Jews. Konstantin Pobyedonostsyev was an adviser to the Czar and he was appointed to deal with the Jew problem. As a solution, according to "Pogroms under Czar Alexander III.", “Pobyedonostsyev introduced wide-spread pogroms as a solution. His plan was to absorb one-third of the Jews into the Russian Orthodox Church, force one-third to emigrate and massacre the remaining one-third.” Although this plan was not achieved, it was still a very difficult time for the Jews and there were many pogroms in the 13 years Alexander III ruled. Jewish life at this time was particularly bad because Czar Alexander III hated the Jews. Attacks against the Jews would not have happened during the time of Alexander II’s more tolerant rule. This demonstrates how the level of tolerance of the leaders drastically influences the way the…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The autocratic rulership and repressive policies promoted the feudalistic style class system and prevented societal advancements throughout Russia. The world was entering a…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll was seen to be liberal in the early years of his reign as seen in the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861. This gave the Serfs more freedom and basic rights which at this time was a major liberal reform compared to the majority of the previous Tsars, this was by in large Alexander’s greatest reform. The emancipation, he hoped, would lead to greater agricultural output in order to finance the railways, and the beginning of the…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Austria and Prussia did not want to offend Alexander, so they joined their kingdoms to Alexander's creation, agreeing with Alexander that the "sublime truths" of Christianity ought to guide relations between nations and guide the domestic affairs of nations. Strong religious conviction, they held, was necessary for maintaining upright and loyal subjects. The rulers of Russia, Austria and Prussia agreed that challenges to their authoritarian rule by liberalism and revolution ought to remain suppressed. Within Russia, Tsar Alexander I had to reform the state of Russia quite a bit as territories such as Poland and Finland were at risk of being lost due to nationalistic movements within them . Therefore, the Tsar decided to try to unify Poland with Russia, giving them a similar constitution to the one in Russia. Being enlightened by western and philosophical theories, Alexander successfully modernized the highly traditional monarchy in Russia and began the process of creating a constitutional monarchy. It was Alexander who felt that the key to successful constitutional rule was the abolition of serfdom, an institution that dominated Russia for more than 600 years, in order to boost the nation’s economy. A plan to abolish…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    TIME LINE 1855-1881 Alexander II established the zemstvos: a form of local self government First Russian westernization attempt 1861- Emancipation of Serf: was incomplete serfs were left to pay for their land… redemption payments Mir: village community 1863-1864 reforms of law, education and local government 1881 Alexander II assassinated 1881-1894 Alexander III instituted an era of repression and reaction denounced democracy, free press blood revolution police force Okharana 1891 famine • crops failed and there were no reserves; Russia had great famine The Witte System: Railroads, Industry, Tax the Peasants He wanted to expand Russian industry and develop its economy Building railroads will stimulate the growth of other industries Results of Witte System: o Growth of industry at 8% per year…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Decembrists Revolt

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the early nineteenth century, Napoleon Bonaparte was conquering much of Europe and was beginning to move his way towards Russia. After Napoleon fled Russia, Alexander led his troops across Europe to beat Napoleon and free the different countries from the French rule. Most of the Russian army had never left Russia and they quickly saw how much more advanced Western Europe was compared to Russia. They were confused as to how the west, who had underwent many years of war and oppression from Napoleon, still lived better than they did. There was a new hope for a constitution since they fought for the rest of Europe and gave them back their freedom, Alexander would grant the same freedoms to the Russians and they had restored their faith in the government and Alexander.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been attempting to achieve, in increasing his chances of retaining power by preventing revolution and furthering Russia’s position within the world. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation was a success in terms of what the clearly power-conscious Tsar set out to accomplish, when many of its key aspects were redundant and others provided a catalyst for consideration of concepts of political activism or further revolution, an unwanted and unanticipated advancement,…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays