Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Whose Ideas Were Best for the New Nation, Hamilton or Jefferson's?

Good Essays
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whose Ideas Were Best for the New Nation, Hamilton or Jefferson's?
Whose ideas were best for the new nation, Hamilton or Jefferson's?
Prolonging the life of the young country required contributions from both founding fathers. Despite an undying possibility of the federal government becoming far too powerful Hamilton’s ideas by themselves would of done far better than Jefferson’s. Hamilton’s want for industrial power and a much stronger central authority derived from his experiences during revolutionary wartime. Hamilton saw then, the extent the country would be able to function without a source of revenue and with very limited congressional power. Jefferson’s attempts to enact laws to allow states to maintain their former rights, and his support of agriculture in the U.S. created a successful balance as his ideas contradicted Hamilton’s. However if themselves had put Jefferson’s plans into action, an extremely weak government would have led to further great crises potentially leading to the destruction of the young nation.
The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, were advocating for the importance of a strong central government around the turn of the century. Many including Hamilton understood the struggles they faced in wartime a few decades prior. The possibility of eventual failure in anyway led federalists to this previous conclusion. The former ruling document, The Articles of Confederation, and its corrupt often-conflicting policies concerning economic structure of the country prompted Hamilton to turn to loose construction relating to the constitution. Through this new policy of loose construction and by using their own interpretations of 9th amendment regarding the control of banks, Hamilton and the Federalist fashioned a National Bank of the United States. One of Hamilton’s many successes; the bank bolstered the U.S. economy. It allowed the government to uphold their control over issues in individual states. Generated a new sense of power, efficiency, freedom and security for the entirety of the nation. Finally, to enhance the U.S. economy, Hamilton attempted to craft a self-sufficient nation. One that would no longer rely on British and others for manufactured goods. The United States would use their own large scale agricultural good production to eventual assemble a system of exportation of manufactured goods to go alongside their vast quantities of raw resources. These Hamiltonian policies permitted the cultivation and growth of the US economy. With a now robust system in place the new nation thrived.
Hamilton and Jefferson’s economic proposals were put forth in the best interest of the survival of the nation. It is evident that Hamilton and the Federalist’s policy was much more effective. Jefferson’s agriculture based economy would have reverted ways back to the days of the Articles of Confederation. This may have well led to rebellion similar to Shay’s Rebellion at the end of the Articles era. Meanwhile Hamilton’s prudent use of Federal power to control interstate issues and establishment of a strong banking system, united the American people and resolved domestic split inside the country. Furthermore keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States. Hamilton’s plan was by far the best for the new nation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mcculoh v maryland

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1791, as part of his financial plan, Secretary of The Treasury Alexander Hamilton proposed that Congress charter a Bank of the United States, to serve as a central bank of the country. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson opposed the notion, stating that the Constitution did not specifically give Congress such a power which was under a limited government because Congress had no powers other than those specifically given to it. Upon hearing of Jefferson’s opinion Hamilton responded by arguing that Congress had all powers except those specifically denied to in the constitution also known as the “necessary and proper” clause Of Article l. Washington who was president at the time had agreed with Hamilton and there was when the bank was given a twenty-year charter that would expire in 1811. It wasn’t until the war of 1812 that President Madison realized the United States needed a central bank. He had recommended another bank be opened and in 1816 congress chartered a Second bank of the United States which quickly established branches throughout the Union.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How did Jefferson’s ideals of government differ from those of Hamilton? Jefferson believed in strong states which would in return better control the government while also benefiting us while Hamilton believed in strong central government where the states would have limited power and the elite would have a say in government while also basing the economy on industry and large national debt.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton's vision was the most appropriate for America in 1790 because of his argument about the ways of funding debts, the creation of the banks, and the protective tariff. For funding debts, he believed that national government should pay any debts such as foreign debts, state debts, etc. so that they can build up credit with new national government. In addition, he believed that if this properly worked, the nation's economy will be balanced and stable. When it becomes stable, that benefit could also increase the supply of money.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To make a strong manufacturing giant, he needed a strong government that could build infrastructure and protect patents. He was supporting a strong national government since he wrote so many of the Federalist Papers. Hamilton also envisioned an America that was governed primarily by the elite. His party, the Federalist Party would be the one of the rich, the able and well-born. Hamilton wanted affiliations with Great Britain due to his passion for elitism and trade. On the other hand, Jefferson wanted an American that was predominantly agrarian, with most people being small scale subsistence level farmers. Maybe they would produce a little surplus for local markets but not for international consumers. There would be no international trade and he didn’t want manufacturing either. This small scale local economy could best be served by a small scale local government. Jefferson was a big fan of the French since they fought with us in the war…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton wanted a strong government whereas Jefferson believed in an agricultural and mainly country side democracy. By the end of Reconstruction, the dominance of a central government had been demonstrated by the Union’s victory of the Civil War and one currency serving the entire nation. Alexander Hamilton is thought of as the father of the New York Stock Exchange.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to use Britain’s economic model to create a nation that would one day be as influential as Britain. To do this, Hamilton would have to create a federal bank that would handle the economy and fund a strong government. He knew the United States would have secure currency that everyone trusted if the Bank of the United States was authorized. Hamilton believed that a bank was necessary for the advancement of the U.S. He said. “The powers contained in a constitution. . . ought to be construed liberally in advancement of the public good.” Jefferson had quite the opposite views on the Bank of the United States. He was against the idea of the bank because it would centralize powers in the big northern cities. Jefferson also feared that the banks would only benefit the rich. He did not believe that Congress had the power to create the Bank of the Unites States. Jefferson defended his beliefs by saying, “The second general phrase is to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the enumerated powers. But they can all be carried into execution without a bank. A bank therefore is not necessary, and consequently not authorized by this phrase”. Hamilton and Jefferson also…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those that followed Jeffersonian ideologies believed that the Articles of Confederation were a suffice method of running the country. Hamilton believed in a large…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson have different views about the future of America, but they both and intensions to better America by 1794. Hamilton believed in the government getting stronger with the rise of large corporations that can help provided jobs. Jefferson wanted to weaken the central government, and empower the states governments. Which view was more realistic and created a more secure system? With the Hamilton and Jefferson conflict, this helped raise political parties to decide what is good for the United States of America. Each view needed the other to create a government that would be strong enough to protect itself from its people and from external strife.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Two men who have played a major role in shaping our nation. Like most influential men of that time, their ideas did not always flow in the same direction. Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton butted heads, they established many of today’s ideals. This essay will describe Jefferson and Hamilton, describe how they shaped the political divide as well as why we credit them with the beginning of the two political parties of today.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton said, “He wanted a strong federal government”(Doc 1). The benefits of having a federal government was that the country would have a stronger say over policies than States. Hamilton know that if we had a federal government(Doc 1). If states had power and we needed to apply a law/act for the country it would be harder to apply rather than if we had a federal government. Hamilton's idea for having a federal government is a great idea that would give the country more power and a stronger say over laws/acts. Hamilton’s idea to have a strong federal government is another of his many great ideas to improve the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton spent his whole life career fighting the Jeffersonian people. He thought that the focal point of governing should be done by the federal government. The government and Jefferson’s ideals succeeded over Hamilton and the federalists. The government created the separation between powers and also passed the alien sedition acts of 1798. They were some of the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The followers of both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton experienced a lengthy battle in the year of 1791. This conflict involved the National Bank being established and the Jeffersonians and Federalists going head to head. Hamilton proposed a Bank of the United States, taking the Bank of England as his model. In this bank the central government not only would have a convenient strongbox, but federal funds would stimulate business by remaining in circulation. The bank would also print the needed paper money and provide a stable national currency. Jefferson argued against the bank and he insisted that in the Constitution, there was no specific authorization for such a bank. He believed that all powers not specifically granted to the central government were reserved to the states, while Hamilton was convinced of the opposite. Jefferson concluded that the states, not Congress, had the power to charter banks. Believing that the Constitution should be interpreted literally, Jefferson and his states’ rights followers embraced the theory of “strict construction.’’ In contrast, Hamilton believed that what the Constitution did not forbid it permitted, yet Jefferson generally believed that what it did not permit it forbade. Alexander Hamilton then presented a brilliantly reasoned reply to Jefferson’s arguments to President Washington. He explained the clause of the Constitution that states that Congress may pass any laws “necessary and proper’’ to carry out the powers vested in the various government agencies. Hamilton also argued that establishing a national bank would be not only proper but necessary, as well. He and his federalist followers supported the theory of “loose construction’’ by invoking the “elastic clause’’ of the…

    • 381 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics