Preview

Who Is Nagel's Argument?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Nagel's Argument?
Nagel's argument is that death is bad to cause individual power by his consenting to directed against views from the beginning, and carefully establish the boundaries of his argument. For example, Nagel decides to leave aside the complex debate over whether we are "immortal" in some fashion - and define death as being the absence of any "conscious survival" .Similarly, he is equally careful to restrict the valuation of life to one's subjectivity instead of viewing it in an objective sense. This removes complications that may come from an "objective" viewing of the valuation of life from the perspective of others. Having thus carefully framed the boundaries of his argument, Nagel presents his key contention with regard to the "asymmetry" in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Mulholland’s aqueduct operation was done, the World War I began. Since the United States was busy to settle down and controlled the urbanization, US should had been remained neutral. However, to be prepare the surprise attack, US wanted to be able to protect themselves. During the World War I, it was the best time for US to promote more trade and expanded their market toward the world. To do so, federal governments granted money for developing ports and facilities. According to Josef W. Konvitz, through the expansion of shipping, the great port cities acquired a significant manufacturing sector, including shipbuilding, and met the needs of their growing population for food and energy supplies (Konvitz 293). It was true that it was part…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "It's certainly not great for Marc and his family. I know he's disappointed," former Grizzlies head coach Dave Joerger told reporters following Marc Gasol’s season ending injury.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe Stephen Feldman’s argument is very accurate. I think his arguments are eye opening, especially his arguments about religious holidays. Around Thanksgiving time there are a lot of Christmas decorations. For individuals in outgroups it would be difficult living in a world of cultural imperialism where everyone assumes you practice the same religion as them. I also agree with the author’s main argument, the separation of church and state does not equally protect all American’s religious freedoms. I realized this when the author mentioned the case of Thornton v. Caldor Inc. the main argument in the case was to allow employees to not work on their religious Sabbath, which ever day that might be. The Supreme Court approved the Christian…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hans Hubermann and the rest of the unit were entering a truck which was transporting them back to camp. During their travel Rein Zucker wanted to be seated at the exit of the truck. Since Rein already had a hatred for Hans he confronted him. Instead of Hans supporting the argument accumulating he decided just to sit in Rein’s reported seat. Hans explained that the back was a better because in his old seat there was a frigid wind going through his ears, in his perspective it would be a more efficient seat.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author shared his take on mortality in his first book, “Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe.” Lewis enlightens us with an in-depth discussion on mortality, focusing on the Law of Nature. He explained humans are curious to know what is perceived to be right or wrong according to cultural moral norms or universal ethical standards. These standards among religions are considered similar by society, but different among individuals.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weikart has also written The Death of Humanity: And the Case for Life which discusses ideologies that have contributed to the decline of the Judeo-Christian sanctity-of-life ethic. Weikart’s purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the science sanction euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. In the article, Weikart talks about Ernst Haeckel, a biologist, and his idea to kill infants with disabilities. Haeckel’s reasoning of his idea was because he was afraid that the disabled would weaken the process of evolving for humans and insisted that Darwinism is crucial. He decides that euthanasia would be beneficial to help his process and relates it to Germany and Hitler’s proposal. The article also talks about we should use our technology to benefit…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of the effectiveness of vaccines has been a long standing debate. Whether vaccines have indeed saved humanity countless times or has been the medium through which companies such as AstraZeneca can instill disease and thus fear unto humans for profit is a controversial topic. The one contributor of society that one would find astonishing to find opposing vaccines is doctors. One such doctor that found, in his experience, vaccines to be ineffective and arguably harmful is Dr. Harold Moskowitz. In a detailed argument published in 1983 in the Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy, Moskowitz uses detailed scientific evidence and personal anecdotes of cases he has handled to present his case on the ineffectiveness of vaccines. Moskowitz’s use of an amalgamation of substantial scientific evidence and personal anecdotes works to successfully reach the rational, ethical and emotional aspects of its readers in an effort to present an…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nagel believes that we are ridiculous creatures in the sense that we can’t prove without a doubt that our projects or goals are valuable. We can’t prove that our pursuits and goals have any value due to the existence of a gap that separates how we perceive a situation and the actual reality of the given situation. By noticing that we are absurd in this sense, we can approach our pursuits and goals with a more spirited attitude in that we think that our pursuits and goals are valuable in order to elude any conflicts with others about whether or not our pursuits have value. Another way to describe this approach would be the reality that everyone has differing values that they hold and the most likely case scenario that we won’t always agree with or support their values. An example of this approach would be an individual who pursues the project of going to Cubs games whenever possible. Say this person meets an individual who dislikes baseball who deems his project has no value due to the Cubs lack of playoff success (prior to this season, of course). That individual wouldn’t take offense or feel wronged by the other’s perception of…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Grendel’s last words are “ Poor Grendel’s had an accident,” I whisper. “So may you all” (Gardner 174). Grendel is cursing the animals around him. For instance, when Grendel illustrates that he doesn’t like animals. This is when he has several incidences with the animals. Likewise, Grendel yelled “I smile, threatened by an animal already dead, still climbing” (Gardner 140). Grendel felt threatened by the animal, therefore he had to kill the goat. The goat trespassed on Grendel’s rock, making Grendel dislike the goat because the goat wouldn’t leave his rock. Also, Grendel implies “Why can’t these creatures discover a little dignity”(Gardner 6). The animals bother Grendel a lot of times. Grendel is just trying to be alone. He doesn’t…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With time, society slowly gains more power and dominance over the minds of the people being baited into their own image of life. Death is portrayed as the end of life, but with each death comes new life to nurture and foresee. Ezekiel Emanuel, author of “Why I Hope to Die at 75”, discusses his ideal date of death, which would naturally cause controversy between many people. Through his experiences, outlook of the world, and statistics, Emanuel came up with the number 75, which he defends resolutely. In “Pursuing a Peaceful Death”, author Daniel Callahan takes death very seriously and how people should die. He talks about different ways death can lose its meaning and what it means to have a peaceful death. Edward Tenner, author of…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to these tragic events Nicklinson’s fight for the ‘right to die’ is argued by the high court. Although, it may be his wish; but the court see his it as he is using euthanasia is taking advantage of his vulnerability.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the fatalistic argument may voice their opinions with existentialism. Beowulf whispers to Grendel, “You make the world by whispers, second by second. Are you blind to that? Whether you make it a grave or a garden of roses is not the point.” (Gardner 171) In this statement Beowulf argues that the individual gives meaning to life, and that life and free will are the source of all purpose and reason. However, the evidence presented in favor of fatalism rebuts the argument of existentialism because it is stronger and has greater validity throughout the text.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will be examining and commenting on the controversies that arise from assisted dying and far these are resolved or conflicted by religious and moral principles.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statement in the title could have been referring to any form of death possible, but for the purposes of this essay I am going to stick with suicide and euthanasia as my interpretation. I think people should have the right to choose when they die but I don’t think that giving them the right is possible because of the many problems that could occur if we do.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics