Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

What Were the Grievances of the Third Estate in 1789

Good Essays
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Were the Grievances of the Third Estate in 1789
-------------------------------------------------
What were the grievances of the Third Estate in 1789?

There were three national ‘estates’ in France, the First Estate made up of all clergy ranging from Archbishops to Priests and the Second Estate made up of nobility were the ‘estates’ that did not need to pay any tax at all. The Third Estate was defined negatively as everybody who did not belong to the first two estates including the bourgeoisie, the artisan workers and the peasants. With a total population of 28 million people, the Third Estate was the largest and most complex group of social classes during that time. The bourgeoisie held the most amount of money among the Third Estate, yet they were also taxed the most without having any say in how the money was spent; the artisans provided food and labours for the city; the peasants were the vast majority of workers lived in the country, they had to pay feudal dues including extra payments of money, food or labour to the nobles apart from the original heavy taxation. Therefore their grievances were predominantly against the unfair proportion of taxes that they had to bear, due to which they brought up the agreement of fiscal reform, meanwhile wider dissatisfaction with the privileges of the First and Second Estates was also reflected. However, different groups had their different grievances and actions as well.

To avoid taxation, most of the bourgeoisie aimed to become nobles, consequently the successful ones spent large amount of money to purchase venal public office. Yet by 1780s these positions were in a bidding frenzy which ruined the dream of those ambitious bourgeois. But ultimately, the grievances were originated from the lack of equality in taxation. Moreover, the political grievances represented by the request of voting by head were expressed immediately after the Estates-General, it was rejected by the King’s advisor Necker although he agreed to double the representation of the Third Estate. They still had to vote by order, where the first two estates could vote whatever privileges them. As long as the superiority existed, the grievances of the bourgeoisie would not eliminate. As a result the bourgeoisie came up with the Tennis Court Oath during the June of 1798 which stated that they would remain assembled until a constitution had been written, meeting wherever it was required and resisting pressures from the outside to disband.

At the same time, a savage storm devastated the ripe crops in Paris basin which resulted in a food crisis On 13 July 1788. The price of the bread was climbing, till 1789 the price reached the highest level since the reign of Louis XIV. People spent too much money on bread and pushed the artisans to the position of unemployment as most of the peasants and some of the artisans themselves cannot afford extra money except the cost of basic food. The fact perceived by the artisans was that the reforming ministers had removed price controls on grain and blamed the ministers for the removal of restrictions on the import of British manufactured goods which reduced the sales of French products. The grievances led to the Storming of the Bastille, on 14th July 1789 which is stirred up by the news of events at Versailles. The artisans were concentrated at the towns and most of them were literate and militant therefore they could soon form their own powerful forces in the cities. They broke into the Bastille prison, in consequence de Launey, the governor of the Bastille, surrendered.

The peasants were basically ignored by the Estates-General. The bourgeoisie and the artisans might have a chance to voice their grievances, the peasants were totally excluded as most of them were illiterate and miscommunication always happened when they express their concerns to the local lawyer or lord, and more importantly they were too poor to be included by the meeting. The peasant families suffered even more form the food crisis as they had to pay more the feudal dues. They started small regional protests of about bread price in late 1788 and continued to protest against hunting rights, feudal dues, tithes and royal taxes in early 1789. They rose up and destroyed records of feudal dues and properties of nobilities.

Surprisingly, no grievances were against Louis XVI personally or against the Monarchy as an institution in 1789, the artisans even advocated the King’s advisor Necker and started to realize that the government was closely linked to them. It was all about inequality and the miserable life it brought to them.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loans by Necker's successors De Fleury and Callone - between 1782 and 1786 left the government with only one option – a total reform of the taxation system. A uniform tax, paid by all including nobles and the clergy, would replace the current system of overlapping taxes which was inefficient and corrupt. However the reforms where rejected by the nobility at Assembly of Notables in 1787. The dismissal by the nobles led to the King, Louis XVI, sending the laws directly to the Parlement of Paris - who in turn refused to approve the decree without the consent of the people through an Estates general. A battle between the King and the people – being represented by the Parlement – had begun. The King removed and exiled the resistant Parlements, causing outrage around the country and the outbreak of never-seen-before civil disobedience in urban centres.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the revolution, the bourgeoisie, or the wealthier and working part of the middle class, belonged to the Third Estate. The Third Estate, out of the Estates, had the almost no rights and the largest tax burden. However, after the new National Assembly issued the Declaration of the Rights of Man and drafted a new constitution for France, the nobility was eliminated and the bourgeoisie gained a massive amount of political power.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 IDS

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In what ways did the legal division of society under the Old Regime fail to reflect the actual political and social conditions of France? What observations may be made about the existing property system?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the medieval era, France had a feudal system of governance where the upper nobility siding with the kings controlled the lower classes. The social structure was fragmented into three unequal hierarchical groups consisting Kings, lords and peasants. The kings ruled the land and were believed to have been granted this right by God that they passed on through heredity. They incarnated the law and were the absolute monarchs. The Lords on the other hand hold fiefs that they rented to peasants in exchange of labor, fees and protection. The Lords consider themselves far more superior than the peasants or serfs and treated them unfairly as a result. Lastly the serfs, representing the vast majority of France population, approximately ninety percent, were the most neglected and most abused of all three classes.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobles help top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church. They were also exempt from paying taxes, though they resented the royal bureaucracy that employed middle-class men in positions that had once been reserved for them. Both rich and poor members of the Third Estate resented the privileges enjoyed by their social “betters.” Wealthy bourgeois families in the Third Estate could but political office and titles, but the best jobs were still reserved for nobles. Urban workers earned terrible wages.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The requests of representation belonged to the third estate, who received little to no say in their government. This negligence is visualised by the chaier, also notebook, of the poor estate with no dictation of money since divides upon poor men earnings are large and mostly minimal for higher estates (Doc 1). The poor people who…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780s, France had a monarchy with 3 different social classes called estates. The First Estate consisted of the clergy. They owned 10% of the land when they were only 1% of the population. The Second Estate had the nobles, and they owned 20% of the land and paid no tax. Nobles counted for 2% of the population leaving the other 97% to the Third Estate. The Third Estate paid high taxes and lacked privileges. Half of their income was used to pay their taxes and they were starving due to the high bread cost. While the Third Estate was suffering, King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette threw extravagant parties and borrowed money to help with the American Revolution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The heavy involvement of the government in commoners lives lead the third estate to want a less government controlled society. According to document 5, France's debt tripled when they supported the Americans in the American Revolution. With the country in a horrible crisis, they were in need money. Taxing their people was their solution. The Clergy and the Nobles, being the two richest classes, refused to pay even more taxes then they already did. King Louis the XVI lacked…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Louis XIV’s France, tax exemptions for elites placed the greatest tax burden on the peasantry.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document 2 shows how the third estate was made up of 97% of the population but only had 33% of the power. This meant the nobles and clergy could always outvote them, even thought they were only 3% of the population. One of the issues voted on were taxes, with the results being huge taxes on the poor and little to no taxes on the nobles and clergy, as recorded in document 1. This document also shows the miserable effects of this unfair taxing on the Third Estate, with people suffering and children running around in rags. The bourgeoisie, members of the Third Estate who were wealthy but were not born into a noble family, were enraged by their lack of representation and brought a list of grievances to the Estates General. One of said grievances from document 3 was that the votes in the assembly should be counted by heads, giving the Third Estate more influence on the results. When the king refused, members of the Third Estate formed the National Assembly as an act of…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were 3 Estates: The first was filled with the Clergy members. The Second Estate contained the French Nobility. And the Third Estate included the rest of the people, representing 97% of the population in France. Each Estate represented 1 vote out 3 votes on political and legal matters.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution - 1

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many issues that led up to the French Revolution. For example, the unfair tax burden. According to Document two, the Third Estate paid all of the government taxes. There were three estates. The 1st estate was all of the clergy; they had wealth because they collected taxes from the 3rd estate and they also owned land. They had power, food, liberty, and freedom. The 2nd estate was the rich titled nobility. They derived their wealth from land ownership, and they collected some taxes. They also had power, food, and freedom. The 3rd estate was separated into three different classes. The Bourgeoisie was the highest of the third estate; they had cash wealth since they were made up of the merchants, bankers, and artisans. The Bourgeoisie paid very high taxes, and had very little power, they had a food supply, but they had no power. The peasant farmers, and the city workers had no wealth, power, or liberty, and they had to pay taxes. The 1st and 2nd estate only took up about 3% of the population. The Bourgeoisie thought that the taxes were unfair to the entire 3rd estate. Document three explained how a peasant had 7 children, and couldn’t support her family, but she still had to pay taxes. This shows how unfair the tax burden was.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The estates general meeting was a huge opportunity for the poorest people of the third estate to be heard by the king. The double representation was seen as a huge victory and a hope for a change was growing. On the first days of the meeting, they brought cahiers, the King and his delegates announced the principles of the meeting and the Third Estate discovered that the double representation was in fact a sham. It was decided that the votes will be hold by orders, 1 vote for each estate and not by head. The double representation was a fallacy. Louis XVI and his advisors focused on a complete overhaul of the French tax system. They exposed their view while the only preoccupation of the Third Estate was to talk about their representation. The only solution to the financial crisis was to make all us people of France pay the taxes because of the deficit spending, no matter what estate they were from. At the time, only us the third estate was subject to the taxes. The Nobility was taking care of the lands and the Clergy was responsible of the people's education. Their argument was that their action was a huge benefit to society and should therefore be exempt from paying taxes. But obviously, the King's decision was heavily rejected by the Nobility. Louis XVI faced a huge resistance from his own group who wouldn't accept any loss of wealth or power. He was heavily criticized by the Nobility who pictured him as a stupid, nerdy man with a way of governing the country that was full of nonsense.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Old Regime

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Old Regime consisted of three elements and one of those elements was politics which was based on power and who or what ruled over a certain region. The 18th century was known as the great age of the aristocracy. The nobility had an approximately 1 to 5 percent of the entire population of any country that was given. Yet it was known that in every country the nobility was the single wealthiest sector of the population and had the widest degree of social, economic and political power; they also set the tone of polite society.1 “The British nobility was known as the smallest, wealthiest, best defined, and most socially responsible aristocracy resided in Great Britain.”2. The French nobility were known as “one of the sword” and “of the sword”.3 When it came to peasants it is told that most French peasants owned some land, but there were few serfs in eastern France. Also that nearly all French peasants were subject to certain feudal dues, they included the required use for payment of the lord’s mill to grind grain and his oven to bake bread.4 This basically means that many peasants in this time had no political right to run themselves and their lives especially because they had to pay taxes. Since they did not have any rights they would work for the King in order…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1780’s, France stood as one of Europe's great nations. But people were starving and the commoners were constantly giving away their money to the rich. They barely were able to dress in anything and most of them had no shoes to wear. Every night bread was the main dish they ate and their houses had rats and other insects living with them. In the 1780’s the harvest was very bad, which made the price for bread even more expensive. Because of costly wars France was in huge debt and raised taxes on the commoners, and they were also the only ones that worked. The nobles pay taxes to the king, but they just taxed the commoners. Paris was in a financial crisis and was a very sad place at the time. Commoners were under the clergy,…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays