Preview

What Was The Second Turko-Egyptian War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Second Turko-Egyptian War
The Second Egyptian–Ottoman War or Second Turko–Egyptian War lasted from 1839 until 1841 and was fought mainly in Syria, whence it is sometimes referred as the (Second) Syrian War. In 1839, the Ottoman Empire moved to reoccupy lands lost to Muhammad Ali in the First Turko-Egyptian War. After suffering a defeat at the Battle of Nezib, the Ottoman Empire appeared on the brink of disintegration. Britain, Austria and other European nations, rushed to intervene and force Egypt into accepting a peace treaty. The Ottoman Empire invaded Syria, and Hafiz Pasha, accompanied by Moltke, marched an army into Syria. At the Battle of Nezib, Hafiz Pasha's army was routed by the Egyptian army under the command of Ibrahim Pasha. On July 1, the Ottoman fleet …show more content…
The explanation is to be found in the local conditions prevailing in Bosnia- Herzegovina and also in the effect of certain ideologies and foreign misinformation upon the South Slavic people. In Russia, there was widespread popular sympathy for the plights of the Balkan rebellion. Thousands of supporters from Russia poured into the Serbian capital of Belgrade, a Russian general even assumed the role of leading the Serbian army against the Turks. But this did not stop the Turks from having an upper hand over the Serbians. The Russian government however refused to intervene in the rebellious for against the Turks no matter how tempting it seemed. This was due to the fact that Britain and Austria where expected to intervene for the Turks in the advent that Russian attack turkey. This was because Britain and Austria will oppose the Russian if they see that their activates where affecting the interest in the southeastern Europe. Britain wanted to keep Russia as far as possible from the Mediterranean and Constantinople, and also Britain had just acquired access into the Suez Canal when the Egyptians where forced to sell to pay for dept to European bondholders. However the tide in public opinion was about to change in favor of the Russian this was due to the brutality of the Turks against …show more content…
Serbia and Montenegro were to be made independent and fairly enlarged. Rumania was also granted full independence and was to receive part of the Dobruja in return for southern Bessarabia. which belonged to Russia. Russia was to acquire, in vieu of the greater part of the financial indemnity which she claimed, Batum, Kars, Ardahan, and Bayazid in eastern Asia Minor. Bulgaria was to be established as an independent principality with an voted prince. The most noteworthy stipulation of the treaty had to do with the territorial extent of the new principality. With the exception of Constantinople, Adrianople, and Saloniki, it included virtually all the territory between the Danube in the north, the Black Sea in the east, the Aegean Sea in the south, and Lake Ohrid and beyond in the west. Thus a greater Bulgaria was created and European Turkey virtually annihilated. From the diplomatic viewpoint the San Stefano Treaty was bound to stimulate disagreement in all fronts. Austria complained with good reason that the new Bulgarian principality violated the stipulation in the Budapest Treaty that no large Balkan state was to be established. Disraeli was convinced that the principality would be merely a Russian colony and that it would give Russia access to the Aegean and virtual control over Constantinople. He also feared that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Austria and Hungary were the countries who made Serbia and Russia angry, not Germany. Austria and Hungary wanted Serbian land because they had just gained vast amounts of land from the Second Balkan War. The only reason Germany entered the war is because Austria and Hungary promised land to Germany. Their new Franz, Austrias military leader, was assassinated and the one who replaced him wanted to attack Serbia because he held a grudge against Serbia for a long time, but their Emperor said no. Their Emperor was 84 years old and he didn’t want to deal with a war, but the Franz attacked anyway and he didn’t realize that in attacked Serbia, then he would have to attack Russia too. The latest Franz attacked anyway and they got Germany to help them. They were power hungry and they didn’t have a great of status at the time so they wanted more power. Russia sided with Serbia,…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | |NATIONALIST LIVING IN THE RECENTLY ANNEXED BOSNIAN PROVINCE OF AUSTRIA. AUSTRIA-HUNGARY BLAMES SERBIA |…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egyptian armies gained control of Nubia to the south and expanded northeast into present-day Syria…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism, the love and support of one's country, has always existed. At this time, however, it was so prominent, it helped cause the first world war. Since so much pride was devoted to countries, it made the possibilities of peace between past rivals less probable. People felt great loyalty and were willing to do anything for their country. In history, many wars have been over territorial disputes. A country feels nationalistic, and people's pride leads to people wanting to expand with more land. A country can feel so strongly about this, that they will fight for it. The spark of the world was the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife. They were shot by a Serbian nationalist because of the crisis in the Balkans. The Balkan Peninsula was a mountainous area below Austira-Hungary and consisted of many different ethnic groups. Each group was very nationalistic and wanted to extend its borders, especially Serbia. Austria-Hungary took over two Balkan Slavic areas. Document 6 describes the tension in this region at the time. Serbia did not want Austria-Hungary to have Bosnia and Herzegovina. The archduke was shot because the Serbians…

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thought to be because Bosnia had been taken over by Austria-Hungary and many Serbs were in Bosnia.…

    • 542 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction The external expansion of Ancient Egypt, traditionally, consisted of two areas: Libya on the north, especially Palestine and Syria; Nubia on the south. What Egypt imposed on Nubia was the colonial rule, while its control of Palestine and Syria was loose. Egypt’s penetration to Nubia and West Asia could be divided into two stages, the Old Kingdom period and the Middle Kingdom period. The contact between Egypt and the region was limited to trade exchanges and sporadic military conflict. However, in the New Kingdom period, because of the increasing of the royal power and the strengthening of the military capabilities, Egypt’s control of Nubia was further strengthened; simultaneously, driven by imperial ambitions, Egypt's attack strategy on West Asia changed from passive to active. In Amenhotep III, Egypt's territorial expansion reached its peak, accompanied with the rise of the Egyptian empire. The Egyptian empire, whether economic, political or military powers have reached an unprecedented peak. Part one: Ancient Egypt’s Expansion over Nubia In B.C.3100, Menes established a unified Egyptian kingdom, and began to implement an active foreign policy. In order to get gold, adamant stones and treasures, the Egyptians and Nubians often traded and fought with each other. In the First Intermediate Period, the trade and military relations between Egypt and Nubia were interrupted for a time; later, the political order was reconstructed, and the royal family re‐emphasized on foreign policy, but its foreign policy was still dominated by trade and military needs. From 1991B.C. to 1962B.C. the Amenemhat I invade Nubia, and traded with the Syrians and the Palestinians. During the first half of the 19th century B.C.,…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I write to you concerning the recent assassination of the Austrian Archduke and heir to the Austro Hungarian Empire, Franz Ferdinand. We as Serbians and Slav 's must celebrate the actions of Gavrilo Princip and must realise that he is a hero for Slav 's over Europe. Although Gavrilo killed the Austrian and his Wife in a most undignified manner it is the only way for us as loyal Serbians to reject the ways of the imperialistic Austro-Hungarians. We have been run by foreign powers for too long my brothers! Princip is a 54hero! The Black Hand and Mlada Bosna are heroes! The Hapsburgs want to control us as the Ottomans did! I as a loyal and proud Serbian will not stand for this and it is our actions today that will either make or break our nation of Serbia. One hundred years ago our forefathers rose up against the Sultan and now the Hapsburgs wish to run our country for us? My Grand-Father fought the Ottoman 's in Belgrade in 1862 and they managed to send the Turk 's back to Turkey! Surely we can remain a sovereign nation keeping the Austrians out.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Misha Glenny, The Balkans 1804-1999: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, (London: Granta Publications 1999).…

    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sense of nationalism was always the contrary notion to imperialism. During the early 1900s, many provinces in the Balkans were experiencing a rising sense of anti-Ottoman nationalism. Revolution in 1908 gave birth to the Young Turks and new reforms, but that did not stop the provinces from fighting and gaining independence. The provinces felt the need to establish their own counties and provide for their own economies. Nationalism and raw material lead to conquest and colonization but they also lead to revolutions and establishment.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eastern Crisis initially began in 1875 due to Ottoman Turks breaking a promise made in the Treat of Paris in 1856, when they proceeded to persecute the Balkan Christians. This then resulted in a revolt in Bosnia and Herzegovina against the Turks, which by 1876 has spread to Bulgaria. A treaty in 1876 attempted to reform the Turkish government, and was signed by Germany, Austria, Russia, France and Italy, but the treaty failed because Disraeli refused to sign. This was because he was anxious that the treaty would weaken Turkey and Russian expansion into the Mediterranean would be unstoppable, which would damage British interests. Instead, Disraeli sent naval ships Dardanelle Straits to show that…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the first Balkan war, Serbia had emerged as the most powerful nation in the Balkan League and using their new found power, almost doubled in size. This in turn frightened the Austrian Generals and…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1853 Russian Tsar Nicholas I delivered an ultimatum to the Turkish government in May. The Russian demands were refused and in July its forces occupied Moldavia and Walachia (now part of Romania).…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Background: An account of the battle of the Yarmuk aka. Yarmuq or Hieromyax written by Al-Baladhuri in Arabic. A Byzantine general by the name of Vahan gathered a large army around 200,000 men and they conquered a lot of areas in the Middle East: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Israel, and Palestine. A reason for why they had so many men was because they would get men from the places they conquered to fight for them. They met the Muslim army lead by Khalid ibn al-Walid at the Battle of the Yarmuk in Syria on 20 August 636. The Muslim army had approximately 24,000 men. There were also the families of these men fighting or at least throwing stones. In this battle Hubash ibn-Kais al-Kushairi loses a leg. Also in this battle al-Ash'ath ibn-Kais, Hashim ibn-'Utbah ibn-abi-WakkAs azZuhri (i.e., al-Mirkal) and Kais ibn-Makshuh lost one eye. In the end the Muslims manage to miraculously defeat the Byzantines and reconquer the lands in the Middle East that was theirs before. The Muslims also conquer Egypt which was an important area for the Byzantine Empire.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Second Persian War

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The alliance of the Persian Empire, ruled by Cyrus the Great, was a major threat to the states of Greece. The solution of the clash between the East and the West was to create the entire future for the region. It was a question of survival for the Greeks; however, for the Persians, occupying Greece was the main focus of the plan. Nonetheless, the Persian Wars were important because the final result was the separation of Greece and the Near East. There was the first Persian war in 490 BC, but the Persians were routed. As they took on a new approach ten years later, the second Persian war unraveled.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    [5] Petrov, A., ‘Serbia’, in: Poezija Crnjanskog i srpsko pesništvo, (Belgrade: Vuk Karadžić, 1971), p.110.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays