Preview

What Was The Compromise Of 1850

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Compromise Of 1850
Comp. of 1850:
The significance of this compromise was that it, like a number of other actions, was an attempt to refuse the tensions that were leading to the Civil War. It is also significant to write that the Compromise failed to do this to any great extent.
The Compromise of 1850 was meant to be like the Missouri Compromise. It was meant to calm sectional tensions. However, it was not able to do this. It failed to calm the tensions largely because of the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Act. The inclusion of this act enraged many Northerners and the Northern reaction enraged the South.
So, the Compromise of 1850 is significant as another attempt to calm sectional tensions; one which did not really work as intended.
Chiefly, the compromise was marked with something for every side of the slavery issue. It completed with the creating more frustration and anger. The component of slavery began to consider secession, on the other hand abolitionists could not embrace the strengthening of the fugitive slave law, which actually make slavery existence everywhere. Clay initially left his negotiations in disgust a feeling that would resonate around the nation regarding slavery with striking unanimity.
…show more content…
There, the White Man's party sent armed patrols to prevent blacks from voting and succeeded in defeating all Republican city officials in August. By December the emboldened party forced the black sheriff to flee to the state capitol. Blacks who rallied to the city to aid the sheriff also had to flee against superior force. Over the next few days, armed gangs may have murdered up to 300 blacks in the city's vicinity. President Ulysses S. Grant sent a company of troops to the city in January to quell the violence and allow the sheriff's safe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of as the beginning of American sectionalism, although the signs were visible long before 1819. The crisis solved by the compromise certainly alerted the South for the need for political unity in order to maintain its way of life in the face of a more populous North. Likewise, it alerted both regions to the political problems inherent in westward expansion. The Missouri Compromise did not create sectionalism, but it is important as the first possible signs of sectionalist differences in the US.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    t the time when the United States was a new nation, there were a number of issues that needed to be addressed in order for the Union of states to become a working country. In a short period, the North had become more progressive and industrialized. There were larger urban populations and the issues that faced northern areas were different from those that faced the South. When new territories were added to the nation, it was politically relevant that they were added in such a way that the balance of power was maintained. The Compromise of 1850 addressed this balance. The Compromise was a group of five laws that addressed slavery and overturned the Missouri Compromise. The climate of the time quickly becomes one of the northern states against…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was the result of the impassioned debate over slavery which included several elements, consist of;…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was made to settle issues between North and South about territory and slavery that was caused by the Mexican-American War. There were five bills made. The first bill was that California was a free state. The second state was that Texas would be paid compensation by the government for giving California and New Mexico up. The third bill was that New Mexico was a new state without any specific prohibition of slavery. The fourth bill was that there would be no slave trade in Washington DC. The fifth bill was that if a slave ran away, people would have to chase after it no matter what. Even though this was a compromise, the North and South didn’t really like it that much. Texas especially didn’t like it because they lost a lot of territory.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next, the Crittenden Compromise was an important part of American history because it may have prevented fighting over slavery in the future. Amendment two in the Crittenden Compromise says that Congress can not ban…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1850 Compromise was the earliest cause of the Civil War. Henry Clay proposed the 1850 Compromise to solve slavery, as the nation is growing larger. There was a new fugitive slave act in 1850 to appease the South, as California entered as a free state to appease the North. Abolitionist Daniel Webster will compromise but former slave John C Calhoun will…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, in many ways made political conditions worse between the North and South. For a long time the North and South had been fighting about political issues such as slavery. The North believed that it was wrong to capture, enslave and ship Africans to America to work in harsh conditions for free for White owners. The South, on the other hand believed slavery was right and should be used for helping the economy and producing cash crops so the North could use the supplies to make products. But the addition of new states, especially an uneven number made the tension grow between the two sides on the decision of slavery.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally, I feel that the Compromise of 1850 was a success. Clay and his other men were very fair about every decision made. Even though I wish there was no such thing as slavery, I believe that having an even number of slave states and free states was smart. However, because there would be laws against slaves to cross over the free-state line, then there should also be laws set to slave owners that could…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectionalism

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The very first issue that caused sectionalism in the 1850's between the North and South was the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was a package of bills, passed in the United States in September 1850, regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican-American War. It was drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay and was negotiated with Stephen Douglas in order to avoid secession or civil war in 1850. The Compromise of 1850 caused sectionalism in the Union because it first established California as a free state and turned down the Southern proposal to split California at the 35° parallel; causing the South to be frustrated at the admittance of California. To balance out the annexation of California, the South was pleased to hear that the territories of New Mexico and Utah would have slavery decided with popular sovereignty, meaning that the people who settled there would decide whether or not the territory would be free or slave. Little did they know that they were being cheated, because the land in New Mexico and Utah was unsuited for agriculture and not fit for slave plantations. The biggest blow that caused sectionalism in the Compromise of 1850 was delivered when the Fugitive Slave Law became more strongly enforced. The Fugitive Slave Law basically declared that all runaway slaves must be returned to their masters and anyone who assisted the runaway slave would be arrested. It also gave commissioners ten dollars for every slave that was returned to its master and five dollars for every accused slave released,…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a bad solution, because it did not solve the slave problem but it was also a good compromise because it lasted for several years and temporarily solved the conflict of whether or not the new states would be slave states or free states. Perhaps the more important aspect of the Missouri Compromise was the agreement that no territory to the north of Missouri’s southern border could enter the Union as a slave state. That part of the compromise effectively stopped slavery from spreading into the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. The Missouri Compromise, as the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue, was also important as it set a precedent that Congress could regulate slavery in new territories and states. While the Missouri Compromise seemed to settle an issue at the time, its full impact still lay years in the future. The issue of slavery was far from settled, and further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates over it. This was meant to settle the question of slavery in the Western territories that were applying to become states of the Union. It was agreed to draw one line of latitude, north of which slavery would be illegal. The line was the Southern border of Missouri. The compromise was made to make everyone happy, it wasn’t really about the slaves but about power. There were 11 slave and 11 free states and one more state was coming into play. If the state became a slave state then the South would have had more power in the House of Representatives, than the North. If the state became a free state then the South would be weak in the House of Representatives. No one in the government or in the North wanted the South to have more power because they were afraid the country would become a slave nation and they didn’t want that. The only way to make everyone happy was the Missouri Compromise, but it was not an ideal way to settle the dispute over the expansion of slavery in the…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Confederate economy was for the most part agrarian while the Union followed along the lines of an industrialized economy. These different economies fostered different lifestyles that led to different political and social views. These situations further enhanced the tension between the Union and the Confederates. Along with the other issues the issue of slavery and the rights of the states was the primary cause of the Civil War. Slavery was deeply encouraged into Confederate society and tied to the agrarian economy. The issue of whether or not states had the right to choose if they wanted to have slaves or not was debated by Congress. The Compromise of 1850 helped in adding the tension between the states. It first made California part of the United States. Then it gave the new territories but not the states, the right to decide whether or not they should have slaves. The Compromise of 1850 made many of the Union states, who wanted to have greater political control,…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays