Preview

What Legacy Did Alexander the Great Leave Behind?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
933 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Legacy Did Alexander the Great Leave Behind?
Alexander the Great’s actions and decisions have significantly impacted upon the world during his time, ultimately leaving behind a legacy that can be affiliated with the westernization of the globe. He helped bring the western civilization, which included the scientific and liberal thinking of the Greeks to much of the rest of the world. He introduced a study of science for science’s sake to the nations and he is also considered as one of the most successful military commanders in history, for by the time of his death he had conquered most of the world known as Ancient Greece.

However, his greatest achievement – which is to this day debated by scholars all over the globe – is his role in cultural diffusion. Contemporary scholars have viewed Alexander as a philosophical idealist, striving to create unity of man-kind by his so-called fusion of the races policy. He uplifted the status of ordinary human beings, or as Plato and Aristotle called them - barbarians, to the members of a polis –citizens as opposed to as just subjects. Alexander introduced tolerance to the Greeks and Macedonians. Through his liberal thinking he demonstrated that a Persian or any other race could be the equal of a Greek or Macedonian and participate equally in a mature government. It is clear that before such a revolution of thought, most Greeks and Macedonians followed the thoughts of Aristotle, who as previously mentioned, believe that Barbarians (who were particularly easterners and Persians) were menial, vile, treacherous and degenerate human beings fit to be only slaves of the Greeks. When Alexander passed away there was, by a combination of integration, his own authority and stats, the intermarriage with Asians and the appointment of Asians of offices. Thus it can be said that Alexander revolutionized the thinking of the Hellenistic world, which in conjunction with his vast conquests, expansions and education of his empire, not to mention being responsible for the physical and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Alexander’s death, unfortunately the powerful and mighty empire he built up, rapidly declined. But in these remains, were left people of various races and cultures. Even though Alexander’s premature death was devastating it set the groundwork for a new era that is now known as the Hellenistic Age. During the Hellenistic Age, Alexander was responsible for most of Eurasia’s cultural development and diffusion. There were many advancements made during this era, some regarding medicine, military, and math & mechanical sciences.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On june 10th 323 bc alexander the great died . The actual cause of his death remains unknown to this day. There are many different perspectives on the death of alexander the great died. Some say he was murdered and some say he died of natural causes but from evidence from his diary entry’s there are very few perspectives that could be right. There two perspective’s that I believe are the closest too the truth is other that he died from being poisoned and the other being that he died of a flu .…

    • 726 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be quite honest before this lesson I had always held the assumption that Alexander The Great was similar to that of Caesar; mainly in the sense that he was a general who gained power through conquest. Yet, to my surprise, I now know that Alexander was infact the son of a king, Phillip the second. Knowing this, I now view this discussion question a bit differently. There is no doubt that Alexander The Great was infact an influence character in history, but I wager his father deserves more credit than what common history gives him. The empire Alexander created both militarily and politically would, in my opinion, never occurred with the earlier conquest, and alliances his father set up. Simply put, the military and resources Alexander needed to begin his trek across the known world to the Greeks would have never happened without the alliances with the other powers Philip the second secured through political married and then latter conquest. Alexander very well could have amassed a military through the ways his father did, but the point is he did not have to do that in the beginning. Naturally, he would recruit new members to the military with ever conquest, but I believe saying this to answer a question on how Alexander created his empire’s army would be trival. However, the question itself is dually worded. The empire's military, as least for the beginning part of its creation would have been allotted to Alexander through what his father archived.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great was a powerful and wise military leader. His knowledge of the battle field led him to many victories; yet many of his battles ended very bloody for both sides. However, he did this for the good of his people and empire. Alexander the Great is the “great” king and military leader that many people perceive him as because he is wise, merciful, and willing to learn about different cultures.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was born in 356 BC in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia. He was son of Philip II, King of Macedonia, and Olympias, the princess of neighbouring Epirus. He spent his childhood watching his father transforming Macedonia into a great military power, winning victory after victory on the battlefields throughout the Balkans. When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years of Alexander’s life Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature which stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life. In 340 B.C., when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 year old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, which shows that even at such young age Alexander was recognized as quite capable.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was able to do all of this at the young age of thirty-three years old. The Hellenistic Culture blended Greek Culture with Cultures that he saw while conquering new lands. Alexander made an effort to bring people from different cultures and places together. He did this many ways.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Alexander the Great, great?? Alexander the Great was born around July 20th, B.C.E. Well we can see there is a “Great” in the name up at the title. Did you know he did a lot of very bad stuff, but he did do lots of great things. He conquered lots of places and was successful against all of them. Philip II was assassinated in 336 B.C.E. People think that it may have been Alexander and his mother, but don’t worry about that example. Read more about Alexander the Great.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Macedonian King, Alexander the Great was born in 356-323 B.C. He was born to King Philip II and his fourth wife Queen Olympia in Pella. In addition, many divine things happened on the night of Alexander’s birth. For instance, the fire and many philosophers thinks s destroyed temple of Diana in the Athens that Goddess of the hunt, moon and birth was very supervising Alexander’s birth. At the time of Alexander’s birth, two eagles landed on the roof of his palace which symbolized Alexander as the ruler of the world.( Evelyn). In his early life, Alexander the Great was tutored by Aristotle who is known as the greatest philosophers in history.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines “great” as, “remarkable in magnitude, degree, or effectiveness; chief or preeminent over others.” Alexander the Great was born to Phillip II, King of Macedonia, in July of 356 BC. Alexander was quickly exposed to a militaristic lifestyle. When his father, Phillip II died, Alexander started his reign at just 20 years old, already with military experience. Alexander would then go on to create the largest empire at the time, earning himself the title, “the Great.” Giving any individual the title of “the Great” is risky, because of varying opinions. Alexander the Great does deserve his title because of his education, military accomplishments, and his courage.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reading “Alexander the Great” by J. Kelley Sowards it talks about how Alexander had a sense that he was meant for something greater than his life in Macedonia, as the son of a king her had the idea of manifest destiny which was said to explained his “instinct for the unusual, the cryptic, the dramatic in political and religious, as well as in strategic and military decisions.” (pg. 71 MWT) Though many studies and reading it is said that even though Alexander conquered much of his world, he did not complete his life long quest and visions of our world. Alexander believed that it was imperative to record his deeds so with in his ranks he had two scholars named Callisthenes and Aristobus which keep books or dairies about Alexander’s triumphs…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, Alexander the Great adapted a very unique strategy to control and convince conquered people-assimilation. A the same time the Hellenization went, Alexander also respected certain regional custom of conquered areas. Such intolerance of different cultures created a sense of belonging for conquered people, so they would satisfy with their current lives and maintained the hegemony. For instance, different from Ashoka, who interrelated to other religions, Alexander the Great actually was very open to different cultures since he hoped to mix Macedonians, Greeks and conquered people into one larger group. He wore Persian clothing, encouraged intermarriage(even his wife was a Persian princess), respecting religions of conquered people, and even punished Macedonians who mistreated native populations (Lecture 8). His intolerance to other cultures worked and conquered people had less ambitious to take against him. His achievement was proved and appreciated by Plutarch, a Greek writer. Plutarch recorded that Alexander “strove to acquire the goodwill of the conquered by showing respect for their apparel, so that they might continue constant in loving the Macedonians as rulers, and might not feel hate toward them as enemies” (Plutarch on Alexander and Hellenization, p111). Therefore, Alexander the Great successfully controlled conquered people and maintained the peace through assimilation until his death.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Ii and Reform

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander II executed many reforms during his time in power but did he reform for the sake of reforming? In the essay I will conclude whether or not Alexander had objectives in which reforming only partook as a secondary effect, and if so, what “was” he primarily?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays