Preview

What Is Wrong with Killing?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Wrong with Killing?
What is wrong with Killing?

Apparently, the killing of human beings whether people accept it or not, exists within our ever growing society. Obviously it's against the law, however does this make it wrong? The answer to this question is no. From a religious perspective killing another individual is wrong. For those who don't believe in God, killing is wrong as well because it takes away a person's autonomy. As long as someone believes in God's teachings then the act of killing is a violation of God's commandments. In the bible God creates Ten Commandments, which all men should follow. One of these commandments, which Abraham received, suggests that "Thou shall not kill." Therefore, if any individual refuses to follow God's commandments then they are in turn disobeying God. Someone who kills is also taking away the authority that God has. God decides who lives and dies-he is the decision maker. Therefore, an individual who takes another life is taking the decisions God has into their own hands. Besides from disobeying God as well as seizing his right to make decisions, killing is in a sense an act of destroying his property. Since God created mankind, then we are all his creations or property. Consequently, when one chooses to kill, he is also choosing to destroy God's belongings.
In a non-religious stance, killing denies an individual from being autonomous. Everyone has the right to choose or make decisions. One who kills another is denying that individual "the right or power of self-control."
In God's eyes, an individual who kills another is not only disobeying God, but they are also destroying his property, as well taking his power into their own hands. Lastly, from a non-religious perspective, a murderer is also denying his/her victim the right of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The readings over Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church challenged my understanding of grace and murder. I was shocked that as steadfast Christians and instructors of the word Bonhoeffer and his co-conspirators were fine with the consequences of killing Adolf Hitler, even if that meant spending an eternity in hell, to save the millions being killed in the Nazi concentration camps. In the church I’ve learned the ten commandments and here at Abilene Christian University I’ve studied over Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Because of my studies, I know God says, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13, ESV) and Jesus says, “‘But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some moments when killing can be justified, though it rarely is. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the two main characters have the same mentality but different point of views on killing. Sanger Rainsford is an intelligent, professional “Big Game Hunter” that hunts a large variety of animals. General Zaroff is a sociopathic “Dangerous Game Hunter” that finds great interest in hunting human beings. In this story, Sanger Rainsford hunted animals which was proven rationalized where as General Zaroff hunted humans which was proven unjustified.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is an issue that goes against my own personal religious morals. God has given us life and we do not have the right to end our own lives. I personally feel it is a sin against God. The bible supports my belief with the Ten Commandments, Though shall not kill. This bible verse doesn't specify who you cannot kill. It says do not. Killing oneself goes against the ten commandments. Suffering is a horrible thing but I believe many times suffering occurs for a reason. Perhaps, something someone else can learn from it. The bible also can be quoted as saying, Above all things, God wishes that we be in good health and be prosperous even as our souls prosper. God, indeed, doesn't want us to suffer but I still feel it is wrong to take the life that God has given…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft On Euthanasia

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I support religious responses, why to be against euthanasia. For example, to researches according to Richmond David christianity responses of legalising euthanasia is important for him:…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of killing is restricted by all religions. Religions possess that life is a gift from God and human beings are valuable. Islam totally opposes euthanasia. Furthermore, The Qur’an says that Allah created all life and everything belongs to him. In addition, Christianity also is against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God, and that human beings are made in God's image. However, some churches emphasize the significance of not being involved with the natural procedures of death. For instance, choosing the time and place of a person's death is God's decision. Yet, if doctors were to seek medical…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone would kill if they could or were given the chance to do so. Such killers are convinced that they are more honest and open about their desires and, thus, morally superior. They hold others in contempt for being conforming hypocrites, cowed into submission by an overweening establishment or society.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty In Canada

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To understand the death penalty, we must understand why murder is such an infamous crime in God's eyes. Many people would say that murder is so heinous because it is the theft of person's…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>In The Bible, there is a statement that says "Thou shalt not kill," and yet the government believes it can punish for what it already does. It is a crime within a crime and the government should "Practice what they preach." This has been going on for so long that most nations have created a numbness to death.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dudley and Stephens

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This standpoint of murder never being the right decision is supported by Aristotle’s theory of “virtue ethics”. His theory states that we should live our lives according to principles of virtue and morality, and this will lead to an attainment of happiness. Aristotle says that not all of our actions should be virtuous, as an…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted Suicide Debate

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Assisted suicide is a huge topic in the world of debate. The definition of assisted suicide is a physician providing a patient the means to take his or her own life through the means of medicine. This is now legal in five states and more are currently considering passing the law to take one’s own life. Many agree with this law as long as the person that wants to kill themselves has an incurable disease and is not going to have a good quality of life left for them. One of the major reasons that this topic is widely diverse and debated, is that Christians believe that we are not supposed to have the power to play God and take someone’s life, even if it is our own. Kuo says “For people of faith, it’s a bitter assignment. And any policy…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 5th commandment of the Christian faith exclaims that a human being "shall not kill". The fifth commandment teaches people that all of human life is sacred. As of today, people doubt this law without foreseeing the importance…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons that some people believe that euthanasia is morally okay is that if people with a terminal illness want to die, you should let them. Others will argue that life is a gift from God and that another human shouldn’t interfere with God’s will even if they are begged to help. An example of this is in the Bible. Thou shalt not kill is one of the Ten Commandments so it is therefore a fundamental tenet of the Christian and Jewish religions, but is it really murder?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bible tells us that we are not to murder (Exodus 20:13). Murder is the unlawful taking of life, and killing is the lawful taking of life. Technically speaking, if a nation said that euthanasia was legal, then on a human level it would not be murder. But as societies often legislate moral issues in contradiction to the Bible and just because a society might say that euthanasia is good, does not mean that it is. We are to obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29).…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sixth Commandment

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The sixth commandment clearly states, “Thou shall not kill.” Catholics and Christians believe that life is sacred; it is a beautiful gift given by God. Although humans are bound to leave the world one way or another, it is never right to kill someone. According to the dictionary, the word kill is defined as “to deprive life.” This is exactly what two seamen, Thomas Dudley and Edward Stephens, has done to a teenage boy. Dudley, Stephens, the boy and another man, Brooks, were all cast away in a storm on the high seas. Their boat had no supply of water and food except for two tins of turnips, all of which were consumed in just three days. There were no supply of food for the next few days and they were also about 1000 miles away from land. The future did not look hopeful, so as a result, Dudley and Stephens decided to kill the teenage boy and consume his body and blood, all so that they could survive. Brooks opposed to the idea, however, for Dudley and Stephens, it was their only choice if they wanted to live another day. Both Dudley and Stephens should be sentenced to jail for six months, simply because they have committed a crime; the act of cannibalism, which the two seamen had also done, is inhumane; and violating the boy’s rights as a human being is just another reason why they deserve to be in prison.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays