Preview

What Is The Privilege Of The Writ Of Habeas Corpus

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1070 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Privilege Of The Writ Of Habeas Corpus
Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." There has been ample scrutiny of law because of the operation of GITMO in past years. As citizens of the United States, were these people given their rights, or was this just a justified action of enemy combatant?
Habeas Corpus is a law, stated in the Constitution, which gives the right to any person arrested, to be tried for their crime. The must be brought before a judge and given a fair trial for the crime in which they were charged with. The writ of Habeas Corpus ensures that any person detaining or holding a fugitive, allows the fugitive to appear in court to determine if the prisoner’s detention is lawful. (expertlaw.com) …show more content…
Consequently, rather than interpreting habeas corpus as being an instrument in opposition to the divine right of kings to incarcerate people, English judges treated it as an extension of the king 's prerogative to demand "account for his subject who is restrained of his liberty." (Rohde, 2010) It was then introduced into the constitution in 1787 as the Fifth
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Entire Course

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hedgepeth V. Roberts Case
    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hedgepeth V. Roberts Case

    Bush, the Court held that federal courts had jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought by detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp. Scalia accused the majority of "spring[ing] a trap on the Executive" by ruling that it could hear cases involving persons at Guantanamo when no federal court had ever ruled that it had the authority to hear cases involving people there. Scalia (joined by Justice John Paul Stevens) also dissented in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, involving Yaser Hamdi, an American citizen detained in the United States on the allegation he was an enemy combatant. The Court held that the post-9/11 congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) amounted to authorization for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the Government could continue to detain Hamdi. Scalia wrote that the AUMF could not be read to suspend habeas corpus and that the Court, faced with legislation by Congress which did not grant the President power to detain…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    another person in custody at a particular time at a particular place for a certain purpose. Habeas Corpus…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper
    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    POL 201 Final Paper

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    THE HISTORY OF HABEAS CORPUS
    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    THE HISTORY OF HABEAS CORPUS

    The right of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I, Section 9, clause 2 of the…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    guantanamo bay civil rights igorned
    • 3613 Words
    • 15 Pages

    guantanamo bay civil rights igorned

    One of the most debated current events that have had a hold on America and the world are the prisons of Guantanamo Bay. Since the opening of the prisons there have been reported stories of torture on prisoners, inmates being force fed and due process rights being taken away. In this essay, we will examine Guantanamo Bay from the beginnings, to the legal issues by reviewing landmark Supreme Court cases, to the world wide opinions and finally the future of GITMO. After much research, we will review how I came to my belief, that the holding of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay is unconstitutional and that the torture must be stopped immediately.…

    • 3613 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty we have enjoyed as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, questions have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus and have been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal liberty guaranteed by our Constitution and cannot be suspended based on that fact.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics