Preview

What Is The Little Albert Experiment Unethical

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1200 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Little Albert Experiment Unethical
Many psychological studies have been carried out over the years, mostly ethical practices in the interest of knowledge, however there have been some experiments carried out that have had serious negative consequences on their test subjects. Two experiments of this type are the ‘Little Albert’ experiment where a child was conditioned to fear a white rat to test whether fear is innate or conditional. The second experiment was carried out on young orphans to find out if stuttering was a genetic trait or something that can be cured or induced. Both experiments left their subjects permanently affected and neither one would be doable today due to their unethical natures.

In the 1920s an experiment was conducted on a 9 month old baby, to test whether
…show more content…
Almost instantly he turned sharply to the left, fell over on [his] left side, raised himself on all fours and began to crawl away so rapidly that he was caught with difficulty before reaching the edge of the …show more content…
Firstly, the experiment was not constructed carefully enough to provide conclusive findings. Watson and Raynor didn’t find an objective way to assess the infants reactions, instead relying on their own interpretations to draw a conclusion from their experiment. Later it came out that the child used in the experiment may have suffered from hydrocephalus. This would have seriously jeopardized any conclusions drawn from the experiment as in the experimental notes, Albert was described as ‘a healthy child.’ Furthermore, it is immoral to carry out an experiment of this type on anyone unwilling or unable to give their explicit consent. As Albert was an infant, he was unable to give his consent and this point is strengthened due to the fact that Albert was not de-sensitized after the experiment. He was removed from the hospital by his mother, leaving Raynor and Watson unable to de-sensitize him due to a lack of time. It is unclear whether Albert’s mother a) knew about the experiment b) if she did indeed give consent for her child to be used in this experiment and c) knew if he would have to be de-sensitized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Physician Helen Brooke Taussig discovered a surgical procedure for treating "blue babies." She proved that "blue babies" died of insufficient circulation rather than cardiac arrest, as had been previously thought. (NY Times, May 22,1987)…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since they had given Albert, a child who originally was an emotionless being, a conditioned to stimulus of rats mainly animals or furry items, he may carry this throughout his life and shape his development. Another hypothesis they wanted to test was if you could remove these conditioned responses but unfortunately the subject was removed from the hospital, which may have led to some more findings. All in all the study had followed the scientific method, even though it may have been slightly unethical by producing fear in a child, but ethics are new subject in the field psychology which would not have been practiced back in the…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ps210 Unit 6 Assignment

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe this because Watson may have had the child’s wellbeing at heart, but in my opinion he could have cause health related issues such as hearing problems and etc. due to the loud noise associated with the rat, that caused the child to become frightened of it. As for Mary Cover Jones, I do believe that that she indeed complied with the modern day APA ethical because she always had the child’s best interest. Instead of frightening the child she took the sense of fear from the…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological studies are relatively new as far as the history of scientific research is concerned. As with anything, the rules for these experiments have evolved and become what they are today only through past circumstances. There are some main experiments in past psychological history, which became a true turning point and reasons for ethical guidelines to be placed. These experiments include the medical atrocities during WWII, the Tuskegee syphilis project, Milgram’s obedience studies, and Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment. Although the participants in Zimbardo’s study were informed of the situation they would have to endure, there was still a significant amount of psychological damage done.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When we think of medical research and testing, we know that it is a necessary part of the advancement of medicine. When research involves human subjects, we assume that all subjects are being treated morally, and that the researchers will be conducting the studies with respect to the subject’s natural rights as a human being. History shows us that medical studies have not always been conducted this way. The Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, The Tuskegee Syphilis experiments, and the Hepatitis studies at the Willowbrook State School, are a few examples of highly unethical research studies that have previously been conducted. Willowbrook State School may be one of the hardest to consider ethically, because it involved studying children.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Little Albert Experiment was conducted and published in 1920. This experiment happened at Johns Hopkins University by John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner. The study was conducted to prove that there was evidence of classical conditioning in humans making them fear things, such as white mice, by the unconditioned fear of loud noises. Watson felt that fear was learned and that children were not born with it, and he wanted to find support for that. He believed that fear was innate and caused by unconditioned responses, and that if he used that classic conditioning, he could cause a child to fear some other thing that most children aren’t typically afraid of.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The STD innoculation in Guatemala in the 1940s was the experiment that interested me the most because it is so unfair how the U.S. would do this atrocious act and conduct animal testing on humans. After watching this video and knowing how they conducted this experiment it suprised me how the Guatemalan people were not aware of even given instructions of what disease they were being injected with. These people never knew the truth until now almost six decades from then. I do not think that Psychology experiments are more ethical because even though ther is nothing foreign injected into the body, the fact that is harshly messing with your mind can hurt you also. Psychology experiments torment one's mind and may permanently affect them and be…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These guidelines made any further replications of the experiment impossible, which proves how damaging the experiment truly was. The emotional scarring this experiment had on the participants was severe, leaving them to wonder whether they were evil people themselves. Though the participants did not actually cause harm to anyone, the trauma with believing that they were at the time was significant, and even though at the end of the process it was revealed that no one was harmed, they learned that they were capable to hurting someone else if they were asked to. Can this emotional pain caused by the thought to be causing physical pain justify the overall experiment? How can one determine whether the questioning of someone's own opinions, beliefs and making them feel like they had no choice but to stay in the experiment was worth the results given from the…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, because the experimental subjects were never given treatment, “scores of people died painful deaths, and others became permanently blind or insane, and the children of several were born with congenital Syphilis” (Brandt 1). Many researchers explained opinions contradictory to the conducting scientists’ opinions of the study regarding human ethics, such as Dr. J. E. Moore who wrote, “treatment markedly diminishes the risk from Syphilis” (Brandt 5). Since the patients were kept untreated by the USPHS, “as the Oslo Study had shown, untreated Syphilis led to to cardiovascular disease, insanity, and premature death”(Brandt 5). Though the results of experimentation may be reliable, the unjust, unrighteous, and inconsiderate acts performed by the conductors of the Tuskegee Study and the many researchers’ opinions regarding human ethics that contradicted the acts of the Tuskegee study caused it to have a disrespected reputation for the long…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ethical concerns in the experiment were also argued by Baumrind (1964) ‘…. The feelings and rights of Milgram’s participants have been abused and inadequate measures were taken to protect them from stress and emotional conflict (Gross, 2015). However, in Milgram's defence he argued that participants had agreed to take part and some people could have left if they really wanted to. The participants had also a full…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unethical Psychology Experiments The Aversion Project 1970s and 1980s Psychologists involved: Colonel Aubrey Levin “Dr. Shock” – former chief psychiatrist The Aversion Project took place in South Africa in a top secret project in the 1970s and 1980s. The apartheid army force in South Africa would force white gays and lesbians to undergo many torture experiments as a means of turning them into heterosexuals.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (b) Psychologists do not participate in, facilitate, assist, or otherwise engage in torture, defined as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person, or in any other cruel, inhuman, or degrading behavior that violates 3.04(a).” (APA.org, 2017) Without a doubt, Watson and Raynor inflicted psychological harm onto Albert. The descriptions of his reactions include observations of his showing initial stages of fear such as withdrawing and whimpering, yet the authors continued to scare Albert until he cried. Frequent mention of Albert “starting violently” (Watson and Rayner, 1920), and at one point when shown the rat (11 months 10 days/third round of experiment)…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays