Mary Wollstonecraft was the advocate of women’s rights. In 1792, she published ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects’. Apparently it was one of the earliest works …show more content…
In this essay, the argument that women are inferior to men is shut down. John Mill stated that “we simply don't know what women are capable of, because we have never let them try.” Added onto that he stated “The anxiety of mankind to intervene on behalf of nature...is an altogether unnecessary solicitude. What women by nature cannot do, it is quite superfluous to forbid them from doing." They set the suggestion that we should not forbid women from doing things we believe they cannot. It is not our choice to decide. It does not seem bias for John and Harriet Mill to set these specific ideas into society’s …show more content…
It has a powerful part in it which reads “He beat me today cause he say I winked at a boy in church. I may have got somethin in my eye but I didn’t wink. I don’t even look at mens. That’s the truth. I look at women, tho, cause I’m not scared of them. Maybe cause my mama cuss me you think I kept mad at her. But I ain’t. I felt sorry for mama. Trying to believe his story kilt her. (5.1)” It portrayed a woman beat for winking at a man although she did not. It showed that women were seen as the weaker one between man and women. The author attempted to show how women were physically and mentally beaten down because they were supposedly weaker than