Preview

What Is The Difference Between Tocqueville And Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between Tocqueville And Marx
Tocqueville and Marx both held vigorous beliefs on what the new systems of government and economy of the time could or will inevitable lead to. On one hand Marx saw the history of the world through the lense of class struggle, leading to his conclusion that the ever growing capitalist system was no more than another edition to the eternal conflict between the oppressor and the oppressed. “The Modern Bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes and New conditions of oppression.” On the contrary Tocqueville did not view the newly emerging systems (Mostly democracy) as the problem but the abuse of said systems. He concluded that in all of its manifestations …show more content…
In all stories a hero is the one to solve/defeat the problem at hand. For Marx this “hero” is the Proletariat (working class), he describes the oppression of the Proletariat by the Bourgeoisie as a evil that must be destroyed through the socialization of the means of production. “By their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletariat have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win” By this the ending lines of the manifesto he means it is the duty of each working class citizen around the world to rise up as heroes against the immoral system of capitalism and install a better society grounded fundamentally in pure equality. Different from Marx, the first of Tocqueville’s “Hero” doesn't consist of people necessarily but institutions that should be brought up to prevent the mutilation of democracy by the majority. Such as a large but separate judicial system and a small legislative branch. The second of tocqueville's “hero’s” would be the people themselves. Understanding the power of enlightened thought to aid in the preservation of a free republic. “Americans are so enamored of equality, they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.” Here he points out that Americans are so tied up with the notion of equality they forget what truly is at the core of the belief in Democracy,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analyze and critique the role that counter-intuitive insights play in de Tocqueville's argument concerning the roots and nature of the French Revolution.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theme of this article is how Americans are the freest and most enlightened men but they are never happy with what they have.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kuyper Perspective Although several of his augments complimentary to Kuyper’s, Marx’s methods for ending poverty are extremely different. Marx views the French Revolution as a positive event and advocates the distribution of property and the abolishment of the family structure. These radical ideas suggest that he possesses a distorted understanding of human nature. Moreover, Marx’s Communism completely disregards God’s authority and places man’s reason at the center of his worldview. Christians should abstain from embracing these ideas as they are based primarily on scientific reasoning without the support of biblical principles.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He enumerates several conditions by which the government could be remedied including the following: the decentralization of government; the decentralization of the administration; the creation of non-political associations; and the imposition of religion. Only then “a legislative power could be so constituted as to represent the majority without necessarily being the slave of its passions, an executive so as to retain a proper share of authority, and a judiciary so as to remain independent of the other two powers, a government would be formed which would still be democratic while incurring scarcely any risk of tyranny” Unlike Rousseau, Tocqueville has the advantage of having working with more than just a theoretical model of a society and, as such, his understanding of how realistically the majority rule could function differs significantly. He perceives the majority rule of the legislature less as a route for achieving the common good, but rather as a threat of tyranny both political and social; furthermore, and the solutions he offers to this condition are not only far more complex but would require an entire social…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Rights of Man, Thomas Paine portrays America as an ideal nation during the late 1700s. His characterization of the American government is correct in the sense that democracy in America does give citizens their basic rights and the ability to protect them. However, Paine’s view of a democracy is flawed. On many occasions, the government has failed to protect these basic human rights, thus disproving that it is entirely “just.” As America is becoming more culturally diverse, society is becoming less concordant.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tocqueville Flaws

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democracy in the United States has had many interpretations based on success and failures, Alexis de Tocqueville initially details how in comparison to Europe, the United States has established a problematic and darker side of democracy. American Democracy like any “great experiment” is undoubtedly bound to have flaws, Tocqueville highlights these flaws he noticed on his nine-month trip to the United States. The reason Tocqueville chose to focus on the United States, in particular, is because its “development has been the most peaceful and the most complete,” therefore, his observations allowed him to see “the image of democracy itself, with its inclinations, its character, its prejudices, and its passions.” The United States served as a reference…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tocqueville clearly distinguishes the individuals from aristocratic society from the ones from democratic society. Thus, the first ones blindly follow the ideas and doctrine inculcated by a man considered as higher than the other. To the contrary, the second ones, being considered all equals, will rather tend to believe the principles adopted by the mass. In this second case, the majority make the society exists and Tocqueville thought that this standard had to be restricted, so that it does not prevent diversity or individual…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why they believed that the only way to fix society's problems was to completely change it. All of these ideas were brought together in the communist manifesto, Marx and Engels book about communism, the political theory that everyone should be absolutely equal in a society. In this book, they theorize that the proletariat would overthrow the bourgeoisie and there would be a dictatorship of the proletariat. Over time, this dictatorship would no longer be necessary to keep order, and it would dissolve, leaving a classless society. This classless society is called pure socialism, or communism. However, when this theory was actually put into action, it failed, because the proletariat would not give up their…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let’s talk about equality. The ideal of equality has been partially implemented if we were to compare the equality problems America had and has between 1776 and 2017. Nevertheless, women have a harder time climbing the executive and legislative ladder just because they are women. A significant number of Americans still believe that women are inferior to men. Policemen pullover African Americans because they believe they are affiliated with gangs or they carry guns just because they are black. So it is clear that Americans have not live up to the ideal of equality expressed in…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The English literature mastermind, Samuel Johnson, once exclaimed “How is it, that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of Negroes?” The people of the United States had to fight for freedom in multiple occasions; as a nation through the American Revolution, but also as individual groups such as the Abolitionists, and later on through the Women’s Suffrage movement and Civil Rights movement. For, the same document that created this great nation did not protect all those that took shade under its umbrella. It is of great irony then that a nation that birthed itself out of the principle of human freedom is the same nation that prospered by the principles of human slavery. The contradiction manifests itself in three ways: a revolution that sought an unprecedented freedom from the tyranny of England while it continued to dehumanize its…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Nietzsche

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Before expounding upon these ideas, it is necessary to establish a baseline from which to view these topics. It is important to realize that we as humans view everything from our own cultural perspective. Marx speaks of this saying, "Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class."…

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels present their view of human nature and the effect that the economic system and economic factors have on it. Marx and Engels discuss human nature in the context of the economic factors which they see as driving history. Freud, in Civilization and Its Discontents, explores human nature through his psychological view of the human mind. Marx states that history '...is the history of class struggles ' (9).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Obama called widening income inequality the “defining challenge of our time”. The political firestorm created from perceived economic inequality is an increasingly vexing problem in the United States. The belief, that the richest citizens use their power and privilege by abusing the most vulnerable with impunity, as think tank philosophers feed mob rule passions for equality through “divide and conquer” Machiavellianism. Consequently, allowing the government and wealthy individuals to subvert the republican government by maneuvering regulations narrowly towards oligarchic or autocratic directions. Ultimately, delivering economic wealth to corporate or even foreign powers. What is the basic, the essential, the crucial principle that differentiates freedom from slavery? Derek Thompson’s Barack Obama, Inequality Fighter feeds the Baconian type notion that income inequality is purely factual while dismissing the economic freedom principle of voluntary action over regulatory coercion.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays