Preview

What Is The Difference Between The Movie And Justice For All

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between The Movie And Justice For All
The movie And Justice For All was released in June 1979 and stars Al Pacino, Jack Warden, John Forsythe and Lee Strasberg and. A academy award nominated movie it takes place in Baltimore. Arthur Kirkland, played by Al Pacino is a defense attorney in Baltimore who is known as an incorruptible attorney who attempts to initiate reforms in the Maryland justice system. The movie starts with Kirkland in jail on contempt of court charges he received while arguing the case of an innocent defendant. Kirkland lives haunted by the outcomes of two former trials, one client who later committed suicide in jail; the other is still alive but is in jail on a trumped-up traffic charge. As the events in the movie play out it becomes painfully clear to Kirkland just how deep corruption has spread and brings to light how much money and power can derail or cloud people’s ability to make honest ethical decisions. …show more content…
Kirkland detests this judge, and faces a clash of conscience, which is a battle of ethics, to do his job or allow his personal feelings to cloud and affect his ability to defend him. Gail, an ethics committee member Kirkland is seeing, cautions him not to betray his client when he gets incriminating pictures that show the judge in compromising situations with a prostitute. The scene “You’re out of order! The whole trial is out of order!...” is a well known scene that becomes the turning point in the movies battle between Kirkland’s ethical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First off, the settings in the movie are a great deal more fleshed out. In the play, the scene begins with the jurors regarding the judge's final statements concerning the case in the courtroom and then walking out into the jury room. In the movie, the audience is placed in the role of the invisible casual observer, who for perhaps the first 5 minutes of the movie, walks throughout the court building passing other court rooms, lawyers, defendants, security officers, elevators, etc. Not able to remember much about this particular part of the movie, I believe this introductory scene's purpose was to either enhanced the realism of the setting by emphasizing the court building's efficient, business like manner or to provide a timeslot in which to roll the credits for producer, director, stars, etc. The settings aren't only built upon through use of scenery and extras in the movie. Invisible and distant in the play, we see in the movie the judge, bailiff, those witnessing the trial and most importantly of all- the defendant. This is an important change because in the play, we are free to come up with our own unbiased conclusions as to the nature and identity of the defendant, whom we only know to a be a 19 year boy from the slums. Seeing his haggard and worn face in the movie changes all of that, yet for better or worse, it engages the audience deeper into the trial as they surely will sympathize with him and can gain some insight into why, later, Juror 8 does so as well. Of final note in this summary of points concerning the differences in setting, the jurors all mention…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Westing Game, a book and movie of the mystery genre, is an exciting book by Ellen Raskin. The Westing Game book and movie contain many similarities and differences that are worth watching or reading. The book and movie are different and alike in many ways.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political influence and the corruption of power are evident within the narrative perspective and characterisation of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and Kingsman: the Secret Service in order to illuminate the complacency of humanity and our inability to critique the current societal norm. Vaughn’s portrayal of Valentine’s quest for redemption explores the way in which the power of wealth can be used to manipulate the general populace. Moreover, Adams’ use of the Zaphod Beeblebrox and his quest for Deep Thought shows that those in power often do not deserve it. Vaughn’s use of Valentine’s dialogue and narrative point of view allows the audience to comprehend corruption at the highest level and how it is the average person who suffers at…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Later in the movie, the case is in a district court. This had a lot of components of what we learned in class including, judges, bailiffs, the court reporter, and witnesses. As we learned in class, the judge is given the highest honor in the room. In the movie he was given the hammer, placed in the highest point of the room, and even said he should be addressed as “judge” or “your honor”. The bailiff on many occasions addresses the courtroom and says, “All rise” just as we learned as well. On another occasion, Kaffee asks the courtroom reporter to read back Colonel Jessup’s statement, because they must write down everything said at trial. This was all taught when we learned about the courtroom workers.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “No human race is superior; no religious faith is inferior. All collective judgments are wrong Only racists make them”. The great debaters movies and the Mississippi trial have their difference and also similarities about racism.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I like the movie a christmas carol more than the book. The story a christmas carol has been a very famous story for a long time. The move was better because you could see the actions the charters was taking. Every time the charters mood would change in the movie the lighting or the music would change.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The non-conformist - Juror number 8 (Davis played by Henry Fonda) says that he has reasonable doubt, and can’t decide in five minutes whether or not someone should be sent to the electric chair. The movie proceeds from here; they discuss the case in a roundtable fashion and their intent is to prove Davis wrong. They made statements such as: “Tell us what you’re thinking, and we’ll show you where you’re mixed up” and “It’s up to the group to convince him that he’s wrong and we’re right”. Although their intent was clear, things didn’t go the way they planned. Davis used the central route of persuasion – he used reasoned, rational, and logical arguments that convinced the group to re-consider the evidence they were given. Most of the jurors seemed to be educated men so they were more persuaded by reason versus emotion. There were a couple of incidents where personal prejudice (against the poor) and personal…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many novels are so successful that producers can't wait to adapt the story into a film. However, it is all up to the director who controls how to present it on screen. The movie may be closely similar or far different to the presentation of the book, the effectiveness of each may differ. After exploring the novel “Class Action”, by Clara Bingham, and the screenplay which was inspired by it “North Country”, the novel seems to be more effective as it helps the audience understand the storyline. It has thorough descriptions of the development of relationships between characters, the effectiveness of the setting, and important happenings that all effect the storyline.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two computers “All the Troubles in the World” and “Minority Report” are both machines that can predict the future, but they operate in different ways. The computer in Minority Report is actually 3 human beings with psychic powers. However the computer in “All the Troubles in the World” is actually a super computer that becomes so complex it starts to act like a human. Some other differences are that Multivac controls the world’s economy and can predict everybody’s actions before the people can even think about doing it, while the Pre-Cogs can only predicts murders with vague visions. The ways the two machines operate are vastly different; the Pre-cogs need a technician to constant watch them and special medication, but all Multivac needs are replacement parts to be installed occasionally. People also see Multivac as a god as it can predict almost anything with the data its collected. The Pre-Cogs on the other hand are constantly doubted as some people don’t believe they are 100% accurate. Although the two machines have many differences they are similar in some aspects, they both can predict murders and a police force can stop it before it happens. Both of the universes heavily rely on the two machines to make the world a better place. Overall the two stories “All the Troubles of the World” and “Minority Report” have similar concepts but are very different when you look at how the machines function.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In 12 Angry Men

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It’s the hottest day of the year in New York City, and 12 clammy men, who were put on a jury, are locked into a room, where the fan doesn’t work and the windows stick, to discuss the case of an 18 year old accused of murder. In the opening scene, the judge states that is it a first degree murder and if found guilty the teenager will receive the death penalty. The 18 year old is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade. The 12 jurors must decide if there is enough evidence to convict the teen of murder. When the initial vote is taken it is 11-1. The one vote for not guilty is juror eight, whose real name is Davis. He is a well-spoken man, wore a suit and tie and had his dark hair slicked back for the trial. Davis admits that he doesn’t know if the teen is innocent but says he could be. In the movie 12 Angry Men, Juror eight shows true justice…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rose initially perceives a societal tension between individual truth and a common call for unity. Society’s expectation, Rose suggests, is to absolve preconceptions in the pursuit for a neutral and modal citizenship. Such concern is established in Rose’s judge’s speech, imploring the jury to ‘separate the facts from the fancy’, and to reach a common cause of a ‘unanimous verdict’. However, standing in the way of this model is an individual perception of truth and order, established by Rose in the domineering presence of certain Jurors. Juror 3 seeks to close the proceedings by isolating the facts of the case, stating “Let’s slap him down..save us a lot of time and money.” Furthermore, Juror 7’s self-interest manifests in his declaration “Let’s vote, who knows, maybe we can all go home.” The ability to become an active citizen, therefore, is seen by Rose as vital to a transparent and self-evident judicial system. Juror 8 consolidates this democratic purpose by stating ‘it’s not easy for me to raise my hand without talking about it first’. As such, Rose draws attention to a necessary unification and humility under society’s ideals, fulfilling the individual’s understanding of the judicial system.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his critically thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son. He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is just punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the vote count; he “looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table” … (thundering) All right” (30).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Mercy Definition

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, how do we fix the corruptness of the system? According to the government we have to be rich and know people high up in the system. Furthermore, McMillian’s case was not judged fairly. Stevenson felt pity for him and what he was going through. He could relate to the situation and tried to help the best he could, but nothing could be done. In that situation, all one can do is…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is your plan for today, which university should I apply to, or maybe more complicated question, “which party will win the election”? Tons of conflicts, negotiations and decisions we are experiencing in our daily life and most of the time we spend seconds, minutes or maybe a few hours to come up with a proper decision. However, when the situation turns into challenging decision by estimating someone’s fate and determine his/her future, that time the decision must be further intelligent and brave. Upon watching the 12 angry men movie, various concepts of organizational behaviour were covered, such as personality and learning, conflict and stress, groupthink, organizational culture and leadership.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays