What Is The Difference Between Mikaila And David Kidd
SHERROD CATONE v. KIDD
Mikaila SHERROD, through her guardian ad litem, Jennifer CATONE, Respondent, v. David and Elizabeth KIDD, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 25498-4-III.
-- April 17, 2007
How is this case related to mutual assent?
As in this case wa an example of torts when the dog of Elizabeth and David Kidd bit Mikaila, Kidds tried to give them amount of money to satisfy Mikaila and her guardian to not solve this by arbitration. So mutual assent would be if they accepted offers that Kidds made as mutual assent would mean that offeree accepts offer and all of it terms from offeror. As they didn’t accept these offers we don’t have a mutual assent until the result of arbitration came. Mikaila and her guardian wanted to accept last
Mikaila SHERROD, through her guardian ad litem, Jennifer CATONE, Respondent, v. David and Elizabeth KIDD, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 25498-4-III.
-- April 17, 2007
How is this case related to mutual assent?
As in this case wa an example of torts when the dog of Elizabeth and David Kidd bit Mikaila, Kidds tried to give them amount of money to satisfy Mikaila and her guardian to not solve this by arbitration. So mutual assent would be if they accepted offers that Kidds made as mutual assent would mean that offeree accepts offer and all of it terms from offeror. As they didn’t accept these offers we don’t have a mutual assent until the result of arbitration came. Mikaila and her guardian wanted to accept last