Preview

What is the arche?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What is the arche?
Arche is a Greek word meaning “beginning”. The word indicates the origin or the root of all things that exist. In order for something to exist it has to have a foundation or starting part that is secure. The arche is this first principle and is to be considered permanent. In ancient Greek philosophy, from this Arche all things come to be and then are dissolved to this in their final state. Throughout the course we have discussed two different accounts of what the arche is; First the material arche of Anaximenes then the formal/ideal arche of Socrates. Both of the same concept however taken in different directions. Anaximenes was Anaximander’s pupil. He believed that the arche was elemental as well however he didn’t believe it was water. He believed air was the principle of all things and describes it to have divine attributes. Anaximenes believed in theory of change and had observations that supported his theory. He believed air was infinite and could be anything. When made finer air becomes fire, when made thicker it becomes wind then eventually becomes water then earth and so on. He also believed that motion was eternal and brought forth change. Air is invisible and only becomes visible by the hot and the cold and movement. It is always moving. Anything that changes does not change without motion. Air is changed through condensation so the most influential components of generation are hot and cold, opposites. On the other hand, Socrates believed in principles that were less material. Socrates believed that we could examine existence with only our senses. He thought that our senses were only reflections and are limited. Socrates spoke of forms. Everything partakes in a certain form. The fact that it partakes in this form it is impossible for it to partake in another form. In other words an opposite cannot be the opposite of itself.
This brings us to the example of the snow. Heat is different from fire and cold is different from snow. Socrates goes on to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Vii of the Republic

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates compares the visible part of the world, the world of Belief, to the cave. The prisoner’s upward journey to freedom and the things above is like the journey of the soul to the world of Ideas, including the Form of Goodness.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He reiterates his point that something cannot accept its characteristic’s opposite by stating that, “…not only opposites will receive opposites, but also that nothing which brings the opposite will admit the opposite of that which it brings, in that to which it is brought” (Plato 3). He says that one of the characteristics that the soul possesses is life, which is the opposite of death, so, “…the soul, as has been acknowledged, will never receive the opposite of what she brings” (Plato 3). Socrates explains that the soul can never admit death because it possesses a quality that is death’s opposite. When death approaches the soul, according to his previous arguments, it would either retire or perish; however, “…the soul when attacked by death cannot perish” (Plato 4) because the soul cannot admit death. He believes that when death comes to a man, his body dies, but his soul is preserved (Plato 5). Socrates proves that the soul will not admit death and when it is approached by death, it will not perish, but retire to another…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Though the sciences of optometry and audiology were virtually nonexistent in Socrates’ time, one could understand how visual and auditory aids would skew one’s vision of what truly is. Human beings are born with eye and ear defects, and therefore perceive objects differently from one individual to another. Thus, Socrates rightly dismisses these two fragile senses since our interpretations of reality would differ based on the condition of these senses within our bodies. Because what we see and hear seems a certain way to us, we are essentially accepting the seeming by receiving images and sounds. There is no way to arrive at what truly is without referencing what we have accepted, and what we accept is…

    • 2216 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to prove that Socrates is successful in replying to the objections of Simmias and Cebes in Plato’s Phaedo, and in proving the soul to be immortal.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Socrates did not always think that he was wise, many people labeled him as a teacher. Socrates did not really care for this label. He did not really think that he knew much. Socrates had a friend named Chaerephon who went to the oracle the God of Delphi. Cheaerephon asked the oracle is there any one wiser then Socrates, the oracle answered no (21a). Socrates did not understand this and set out to prove the oracle wrong. While out to prove the oracle wrong Socrates realized he is wise but not because he knew everything, but because he realized he knew nothing and didn’t act as if he did.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Very interesting, to say the least, analogies that Socrates uses is physical actions to explain opposing parts of the soul working together(153). To begin his argument about a three part soul, Socrates first tries to explain that opposing parts of the soul can work together. To explain this conclusion, Socrates uses two analogies…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The St. Louis Gateway Arch is an elegant monument to westward expansion in the USA. Located on the banks of the Mississippi River in St. Louis, Missouri, the 630-foot tall stainless steel arch rises above the city skyline. The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial consists of the Gateway Arch, the Museum of Westward Expansion, and St. Louis' Old Courthouse.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments For Phaedo

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates starts by making a distinguish between compound things and uncompounded things. Compound things, like pencils,…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory of the Cave

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Socrates is saying may relate or connect to our lives in the sense that politics for example does not give…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    helloham

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Socrates describes his views about the nature of Truth and knowledge. his view of his duties; the nature of his courage (why a good man need not fear death…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Socrates

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the four dialogues, Socrates professes that he is for nature in different ways. He describes nature and human nature. He believed that human nature involves reasoning and consisted…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays