Preview

What is Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
774 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What is Philosophy
“What is Philosophy?”
According to the famous Greek philosopher Socrates, “The unexamined life is not worth living”. But what does he mean by this? He means that we should look and think through life deeper. Examination of life is more than just a use of common sense. Hard thinking is necessary even though it disturbs. With the use of Philosophy, we better understand things and answer the most important questions in existence. Philosophy, according to the famous Greek philosopher Aristotle, begins with wonder at the marvels and mysteries of the world. In other words, we started to question things around us because of our curiosity and our need to attain knowledge about things. Philosophy is the love of wisdom (etymologically from the Greek word philos, meaning “love”, and sophia, meaning “wisdom”). It means that we must have the initiative to pursue knowledge because we love to have it. Seeking the truth doesn’t always mean triumph, success or satisfaction. Sometimes, giving up our received tradition and disturbing our common sense requires our intellectual and emotional strength for us to be able to grasp new ideas that would later on benefit us and free us from wrong notions, beliefs and ideas. We must not give up in philosophical inquiry and reserve ourselves for the pursuit of truth because truth will set us free from the darkness of ignorance. Philosophy is not always constant. We must learn to develop the sense of perceiving others’ viewpoints. Philosophy points out our every false perception in terms of what we believed in. But people react to philosophical inquiry in different ways — positively or negatively. In this way, Philosophy teaches us to argue. One of Philosophy’s tasks is to clarify concepts. We should learn to dispute over the different concepts by looking at the frame of reference of the phrase, note its inherent ambiguity, and to unravel it making things clearer. In short, understanding is a major factor in order to clarify concepts.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages

    "The unexamined life is not worth living" is a cornerstone of the philosophy of Socrates. P81…

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Cave on Ignorance

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freeing from the psychological prison we create by continuously depending on what we see and understand to be true realities can be achieved in learning and logical reasoning. “Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?” (Socrates 19). Demonstrated in this quote, is the beginning stage of acceptance and awareness; hesitation. This growing open-minded approach to unfamiliar situations is required in order to leave behind our old and ignorant ways. Socrates suggests to the reader that preparation for the real world and a need to pursue truths through the use of education will serve as guidance down more desirable life paths. He also introduces the idea of the immense responsibility those who have been fortunate enough to access higher education have to provide leadership and improvement in society. But, with the power of wisdom, comes ridicule and seclusion due to the ignorance prevalent in a population that prefers to live with their minds trapped inside the cave.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHIL 201 Lesson 2

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Know Socrates' quote: What is the unexamined life? What did he mean when he said it wasn't worth living?…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Aristotle were both Greek philosophers who contributed philosophies. Socrates believed that all people contained real knowledge within them and that self critical examination was needed to bring this knowledge out. Socrates once stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this philosophical idea, Socrates is suggesting that an individual, who chooses to not think about their own actions, does not truly care about their own life. Aristotle believed in the concept of examining individual objects and being able to perceive their form and establish universal principles. These principles did not exist as a separate higher world of reality beyond material things, but were apart of things themselves. Aristotle has stated, “Since human reason is the most godlike part of human nature, a life guided by human reason is superior to any other….For man, this is the life of reason, since the faculty of reason is the distinguishing characteristic of human beings.” Aristotle is suggesting that an individual who logically thinks about their actions before acting on them, are more superior than those who act without thinking because thinking before acting causes less harm and it shows a person who cares for both themselves and others. These philosophical ideas about self examination on thoughts and actions have come a long way. All individuals think in new and advanced ways and frequently think about both consequences and benefits before acting upon ideas.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examined Life

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Socrates, the unexamined life is not worth living. What is this so called unexamined life? When Socrates talked about the unexamined life, he talks about a life where the person does not question their purpose in the life choices they decided to take. Rather the person lives a self fulfilling life with what they believe will make them happy, such as money, wealth, reputation and self interest.The examined life according to Socrates is the life where the person does not allow one possibility to pull them in, but rather they question moral circumstances and begin to find many possible solutions to them. I believe that when a person has morals they can begin to find better solutions that do not affects others, but rather improves us by bringing happiness and soul satisfaction .…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Value of Philosophy

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Bertrand Russell’s The Value of Philosophy Russell explains the importance of studying philosophy and why it must be done. Russell stresses the fact that philosophical questions are necessary for mankind to be liberated. Russell explains the value of philosophy to our lives. Russell also explains that philosophy like other areas of study is about knowledge; and the problem with that. Russell concludes his essay with explaining to us how philosophy sets us free.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After being sentenced to death for his controversial views and teachings of politics and religion to the youth of Ancient Athens, the historical philosopher Socrates was given an ultimatum to spend the remainder of his in exile. To this, Socrates stated “the unexamined life is not worth living”. [i] Like the subjective nature of philosophy itself, this quote from one of the most famous philosophers of all time can come in an array of interpretations. What Socrates himself most likely meant was that a life of imprisonment was nothing more than the death to which he was sentenced. A life in which he could not explore and examine the world around him was ultimately useless. As a philosopher, this was Socrates way of life: to observe the world around him— the workings of society, the phenomena of nature, and the ideologies and beliefs of things beyond physical existence— and offer the interpretations of his observations to the rest of the public. Though this way of life ultimately spelled his peril, this was Socrates driving force— his reason for living; for Socrates, living a life unexamined was not worth living at all.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Value of Philosophy

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Russell’s discussion “The Value of Philosophy,” he asserted that the true goal of Philosophy wasn’t a tangible, or even reachable, goal. He says that Philosophy won’t lead us to any definite answers, because once you acquire solid knowledge of a subject, it instantly becomes another science. Instead that the greatest value of this study comes from the mental freedom you get when you begin to question the status quo and not just accepting things as they are. He also says that questioning these everyday issues will not lead to a solid answer through the use of Philosophy. But those doubts will inevitably open you up to the infinite possibilities that are available in the world that neither you, nor myself would have been exposed too if the study of Philosophy hadn’t taught us to take a few steps back and examine things for what they really are, or in some cases, aren’t. You see, Russell referenced a “practical man.” According to him the practical man is one who “recognizes only material needs, who realize that men must have food for the body, but is oblivious of the necessity of providing food for the mind.” The practical man is content with what’s in front of him. The practical man is complacent with his place in the world, and in reality, isn’t even aware of the things beyond his hands and eyes. In a manner of speaking, he described nothing more than a man in Plato’s Cave. In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, he illustrated a picture for us. That most people are merely prisoners in a cave, staring at shadows on a wall. In the same way that in society, the majority of people spend their lives believing whatever they’re told with no intentions to question ANYTHING about the life they lead. But in the Allegory of the Cave, Plato stated that there’s a select few of us who find our way out of the cave and see what life TRULY has to offer. That mental and physical freedom is truly an excellent experience to have after spending our whole life…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Value of Philosophy

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the reading of ‘Value of Philosophy,’ Russell starts off by explaing the “practical man,” believes that, “the influence of science or of practical affairs, are inclined to doubt whether philosophy is anything better than innocent.” Russell is trying to explain that the “practical man” looks at the meaning of philosophy, and sees philosophy only in black and white, and when the “practical man” thinks about philosophy, they believe that “concerning which knowledge is impossible”. Russell goes on by explaining how physical science, is so far reached with inventions, it shows how it effect’s mankind, but, it does not belong to philosophy. Russell goes on by suggesting to understand philosophy; we all must free our minds of the prejudices of what we know of the “practical man.” This man is the one who only recognizes the materials he needs, only what he thinks is necessarily, “only food for his body”. But what is a necessity is to provide food for the mind. Russell goes on be saying, “It is exclusively among the goods of the mind that the value of philosophy is to be found; and only those who are not indifferent to these goods can be persuaded that the study of philosophy is not a waste of time.” This conveys that the person should not look at philosophy as just black and white, but to explore all the gray areas between them.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terms and Definitions for Intro to Philosophy TERMS DEFINITIONS aesthetics alienation the study of what constitutes beauty in philosophy, a term indicating estrangement of people or things form what is considered their proper state. (German “fear”); a term introduced by existentialist thinkers to describe the feeling of apprehension invoked when a finite individual recognizes his existence in an infinite world, when he confronts the void outside his own conscious existence. a term used in the theory of Knowledge to distinguish what comes before experience (the opposite is a-posteriori) the practice of extreme self-denial and abstention from all forms of pleasure. a denial of the existence of supernatural forces, gods, or God a philosophy first expounded by Diogenes that encourages indifference to social convention and material comforts in order to concentrate on selfknowledge the view that events do not occur by chance, but are caused by preceding events (physical determinism) or by God (divine determinism)…

    • 1054 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Value of Philosophy

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the introductory lecture notes to this course I stated that we would start with a working definition of philosophy as being the “love of wisdom.” I have found, though, that just about every other definition attempted has many shortcomings. No one definition seems adequate to define what it means to engage in philosophy. Consequently, I think it is best to think of the philosopher in the somewhat imprecise term of a lover of wisdom. Someone who is continually in search of the truth. Though he/she might be ridiculed for pursuing the unobtainable, this search for truth/ knowledge can yield enormous benefits. It provides the tools to critically evaluate the world around us and the information we are given about that world. This ability to critically evaluate ideas is especially important given the role that such knowledge affects and shapes our lives—as we saw in the sections on B.F. Skinner, Positive Freedoms, and the Philosophy of Science. Furthermore, the changes in our society necessitate that we re-examine fundamental questions periodically. For example, advances in medical science have posed new ethical questions. Ethical judgments concerning genetic engineering (engineering certain characteristics into or out of our genetic make-up) calls into question fundamental ideas concerning freedom and individuality. Without some understanding of these subjects how can we frame answers to such questions? Even if we examine these questions, is our approach critical, authentic? Or do we choose to accept the answers given to us by society? Are we not then acting in a kind of Sartrean “Bad Faith?” How much of our humanity and freedom are we abdicating by not engaging in some kind of philosophical activity? Though we pride ourselves on being “rational” people, how rational are our thoughts and actions even if they are “proven?” Or, do we live up to Soren Kierkegaard’s remark in The Journals, “There are many people who reach…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Metaphilosophy relies on the idea that it might be productive to distinguish some general pronouncements about philosophy from philosophy itself. Contrasting with many other cultural practices, for philosophy the distinction is rather questionable, but a similar case is presented by language: when speaking in English about the English language one might assume a split between English-as-object and English-as-metalanguage. Philosophers using the term metaphilosophy being still a minority, it might be surmised that the majority does not consider the idea worth exploring. As far as it is a reflexive practice philosophy always already incorporates its own considering e.g. by appealing to its own tradition, to its opponents or to its history; thus historicist philosophies, such as Hegel's, are metaphilosophies without mention of the term. A synchronic or systemic approach is a more obviously 'metaphilosophical' than a historic or a diachronic one.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Oxford English Dictionary defines philosophy as “Knowledge, learning, scholarship; a body of knowledge; spec. advanced knowledge or learning.” By this definition we can gather that philosophy is, essentially, the pursuit of knowledge or understanding on a much higher level than usual. In the following paper I will present my views on philosophy as a whole by examining what I believe philosophy is supposed to do, as well as how it can benefit the life of any individual willing to invest time in it and the societies that promote such thoughts.…

    • 715 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The inter-dependence of philosophy and education is clearly seen from the fact that the great philosphers of all times have also been great educators and their philosophy is reflected in their educational systems. This inter-dependence can be better understood by analysing the implications of philosophical principles in the field of education. Before analysing the educational implications of general philosophy, we should know the concept of "Philosophy" and "Education". Each one of us has a personal philosophy which we apply consciously and unconsciously in our daily life. Each philosophy reflects a unique view of what is good and what is important. In this sense, philosophy is the system of beliefs about life. The literal meaning of philosophy is the love of wisdom which is derived from the Greek word "Philos" (Love) and Sophia (Wisdom). Wisdom does not merely mean knowledge. It is a continuous seeking of insight into basic realities - the physical world, life, mind, society, knowledge and values.…

    • 6018 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason,mind, and language.[1][2] Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument.[3] In more casual speech, by extension, "philosophy" can refer to "the most basic beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group". The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek φιλοσοφία (philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom".[5][6][7] The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker..…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays