Preview

What Is Mackie's Argument Of Morality?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Mackie's Argument Of Morality?
Mackie’s position is that humans on the inside perceive morality or immorality of an exterior achievement. Mackie also believes that we have moral judgments and assume moral objectives. He leans towards the fact that we believe in some supreme entity depending on our religion and our geographic location. There is no hard evidence that proves that a supreme entity is real but we try to uphold the morals that we are taught that this entity wants us to do to be humble and good. Mackie had moral objectives that were explained in some points which categorically motivate us to act and the actions being exactly right is itself a reason to carry out the action. Then in this chapter Mackie references Plato's account of the form of the good. Is such
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Framing Moral Intuitions
    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Framing Moral Intuitions

    This paper addresses the problem of framing effects for moral intuitionalism posed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong in his controversial article “Framing Moral Intuitions”. In his article, Sinnott-Armstrong attempts to reject moral intuitionalism by questioning the reliability of our moral intuitions on the basis that they are subject to framing effects, citing several studies to support his position. However, critics such as William Tolhurst and Russ Landau-Schaefer argue that these studies are neither adequate nor sufficient for Sinnott-Armstrong justified his claim. In this article, I will address the main areas of contention in this debate and propose a solution that may be able to reconcile Sinnott-Armstrong and his interlocutors.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Martin Marietta Ethics Summary
    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Martin Marietta Ethics Summary

    “Martin Marietta ethics program was one facet of an effort to create and maintain a “do-it-right” climate at a time when the defense industry was facing serious attacks from the government and the public for fraud and mismanagement” (Paine, Choy, & Santoro, 2004, p. 2). During the 1980s, there was an increase in defense spending as allegations of contract fraud often made headlines. To protect itself, Martin Marietta in addition to 18 other defense organizations worked together to form Defense Industry Initiative on Business Ethics and Conduct. In 1991, Martin Marietta’s corporate office received 9,625 calls concerning corporate ethics with 572 of the reported cases recorded as alleged questionable behavior (Paine et al.,…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aed 202 Moral Reasoning Paper
    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aed 202 Moral Reasoning Paper

    Differences that are considered right and wrong. At this age he or she should know…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Reasoning Quiz Paper
    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral Reasoning Quiz Paper

    | |[pic] |[pic]B)[pic|Virtue ethics is a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions. |…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lennie's Morality
    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lennie's Morality

    Steinbeck’s motif of Lennie’s questionable ethics throughout Slim and George’s conversation establishes the theme that morality is a fluid and unclear concept.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sandel's 'Consequentialist Moral Reasoning'
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Sandel's 'Consequentialist Moral Reasoning'

    In his speech, Professor Michael Sandel discussed both “consequentialist moral reasoning” and “categorical moral reasoning” (Harvard University, n.d.). Sandel states that “categorical moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality in certain duties and rights” (Harvard University, n.d.). And “consequentialist moral reasoning” is when you “locate morality from consequences of your actions” (Harvard University, n.d.). Basically, “categorical moral reasoning” focuses on the “consequences”, after “action” is taken, before you actually do something (Harvard University, n.d.). Then, there’s “consequentialist moral reasoning” focuses on what to do, and the “consequences” afterwards (Harvard University, n.d.).…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Slam Dunk: Kent Hodgson's Seven Moral Principles
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Slam Dunk: Kent Hodgson's Seven Moral Principles

    Slam Dunk: Whole Foods scores BIG for meeting the Hodgson’s Seven Moral Principles Kent Hodgson identifies seven fundamental steps to guide managers in their decision making process. The seven principles are “dignity of human life, autonomy, honesty, loyalty, fairness, humaneness and the common good” (Krietner & Kinicki, 2013, p.24). The overall objective is to assist managers in changing the culture of business and to remove the histrionics of unethical and uncaring behavior. It would appear that Mackey formed his company on these seven principles as the organization meets them all.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phi208 Ethics And Moral Reasoning Research Paper
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phi208 Ethics And Moral Reasoning Research Paper

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality
    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page

    Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strawson's Argument Of Moral Responsibility
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Strawson's Argument Of Moral Responsibility

    Being morally responsible is when a person decides whether his actions are right or wrong. And whether the person will be rewarded or punished for his actions. But Galen Strawson thinks that being morally responsible is impossible or in easy terms, the person is deterministic. There are different degrees of one being accountable for his or her actions, and what Strawson thinks is that being ultimately accountable is impossible. The Basic Argument that Strawson gives is that in order for a person to be morally responsible, one must be self-determining; but nothing is self-determining, by which he means that a person has no free-will to what he is doing. And hence he arrives at a conclusion, that no one can be morally responsible.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Morality: Conferring To C. S. Lewis
    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Morality: Conferring To C. S. Lewis

    Morality is the human attempt to define what is right and wrong pertaining to our actions and thoughts. Conferring to C.S. Lewis, he describes the behavior on three levels: First is to certify fair play and agreement between persons; second is to help make us better people in order to have a decent civilization; and the third is to keep us in a good connection with the control that created us. We can become moral by ourselves by expanding those things that can help us pursue our dreams and by believing in ourselves which give us a motivation. What motivates our life is the mind behind the physical things. What motivates the mind is the being that permeates everything.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Chief Good In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Chief Good In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that everything a person does, whether it’s creating something, asking about something, deciding something, or doing an action, is done so in the pursuit of an end goal, or “to seek some good” (1094a2). For every action we take, there is a specific benefit, or good, that we hope to gain. For example, when you prepare food for yourself, you hope to satisfy your hunger or taste something good, and when you ask a question, you hope to receive an answer that makes the topic clearer. In addition, when doing a certain action in order to acquire the good or the end, that end that is being sought after may be for the sake of another good down the road, another good down the road and itself, or plainly for the sake of itself. Everything we do is done with the intent of achieving either of those three entities.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill: The Definition Of Morality
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill: The Definition Of Morality

    To be or not to be? Morality is something that leaves every human being with a concern with what's right or wrong. I think about my perception on the behavior that will follow my choices.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Moby Dick
    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Morality In Moby Dick

    How might someone set their own morals? Morality is the system through which we determine right and wrong, the guide to good or right conduct. If someone witnesses something that they deem wrong, they set morals so they can assure themselves that they will never be like the wrongdoer.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical

    2. Philosophers do not believe that ethics require religious grounding, rather than relying on hold books or religious revelations, philosophical ethics uses reason and experience to determine what is good and bad, right and wrong, better and worse. In the philosophical tale Euthyphro by Socrates, he examines the religious view, and asks whether things are good because they are approved by the gods, or whether the gods approve of them because they are good. Socrates states that god could decree anything to be good or bad. One implication of this view is that mortality has a certain independence, and if that is the truth, we should be able to determine whether certain actions are right or wrong in themselves and for some reason. Mackinnon though, concludes with three hypothesis’s of her own, why we should separate religion and ethics. She believes that we should be able to develop our own natural moral reasoning skills, we should be able to evaluate critically our own or other views of what is taught to be good or bad or just and unjust, including religious views in some cases. Second, Mackinnon believes that believers of…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics