Lying, false and untruthful. In the articles “Brad Blanton: Honestly, Tell the Truth” by Barbara Ballinger and “Rejecting All Lies Immanuel Kant” by Sissela Bok, they argue that lying is never allowed because it leads to many complicated situations. Lying can lead to humiliating your friends and hurts the liar’s mental state.…
Frankie Younger PHIL 121Q Clark 1.31.17 On Truth and Lying in a Nonmoral Sense In this essay I intend to tease apart a passage from Nietzsche’s essay “On Truth and Lying in a Nonmoral Sense” pertaining to concept formation. I will break down his argument into its core constituents and entertain several readings of his claims, establishing one of them as closest to Nietzsche’s original intentions.…
In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…
Is lying prohibited and does it make you “more worthless even than a small thing?” Well, Immanuel Kant thinks so. He wants to really make a claim that “truthfulness is a duty which no circumstances can put aside.” Kant’s argument is so biased because he only shows feelings for honesty. He then shows some negativity and cruelty to the liars, and make mean comments about them. I disagree with Kant’s argument. First of all, just because you lie, it doesn’t mean that it’s destroying your human dignity and it doesn’t harm mankind…
In Immanuel Kant's excerpt “Groundwork” he explains the difference between acting from duty as well as acting from a selfish view. Kant uses the example of a car dealer or mechanic overcharging an inexperienced purchaser, opposed to keeping a fixed price for everyone so that everyone can be treated as equal. According to Kant the person who does not act from duty does things for their own selfish benefits and reasons. In which the car dealer does since they know that they can take complete advantage of the purchaser.…
Kant has explained this by giving an example of moral principle that people should not lie and this moral principle applies to all and one cannot lie given on the situation and his past experiences. Not to lie is a basic human nature and it should be respected by all and all community follows this principle.…
Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience, nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning, there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge, and that from the Presuppositionalist perspective skepticism is self-refuting. If we don’t assume that God exists, we find that we can’t reach certain conclusions and are left wanting.…
When it pertains to lying, I believe it is morally permissible to lie to someone given a specific situation. The most imperative circumstance in which lying has the potential to make more people happy is when it applied to prevent harm/protecting someone’s life. Lying is the right thing to do in this situation as it safeguards your fellow man. According to Emanuel Kant (2008), “Immediately I realize that I could will •the lie but not •a universal law to lie; for such a law would result in there being no promises at all, because it would be futile to offer stories about my future conduct to people who wouldn’t believe me; or if they carelessly did believe me and were taken in ·by my promise·, would pay me back in my own coin.” (p12) Kant believes…
Poverty is a major problem in the world today. There is so many people living in harsh conditions. As we may ask ourselves about the moral duty on what we are supposed to do. Many of us start to think what our moral responsibility to help other people is. People living with less than 2.50 a day.…
Kant's idea of good will, would be determined by how someone dispense with the truth and not necessarily if someone has lied. As such when dealing with deceit an excellent example is given by (Varden 2015) Kant in his short essay 'Supposed right to lie' in which he details a situation where a murderer has knocked on your front door and requested the whereabouts of another whom he plans to kill, now know as 'victim'. The situation demands you tell the truth and reveal the victim to be, or tell a lie and spare the victim's life while possibly risking your own life with both answers. Critics of Kantian moral philosophy often point out that if we have a duty to the truth then we must tell the murderer where the victim to be is, thus creating a conundrum between telling the truth and assisting a murderer. Yet another critic also stated that the (Verden, et al 2015) “duty to tell the truth would, if taken unconditionally and singly, make any society impossible”. Following on from this notion, Kant argued against (Verden, et al 2015) this by claiming that “if you have by a lie prevented someone just now bent on murder from committing the deed, then you are legally accountable for all the consequences that might arise from it. But if you have kept strictly to the truth,…
Moral philosopher Immanuel Kant famously stated that lying was unequivocally immoral even in extreme cases like protecting innocents from a murderer. He believed this approach was implied by the moral system he developed. Later philosophers, however, work have pointed out that his metaphysical framework does not actually imply a rule this strict and Kant, of all people, made a simple logical misstep. The question of what Kant thought about lying depends on whether we are talking about Kant the man or his philosophy. He was at odds with his own ideas.…
In paragraph eight of “Its the Truth: Americans Conflicted About Lying,” by NBC News, they state that, “german philosopher Immanuel Kant, who believed all lying was bad - every single lie, event one that could save someone's life.” Through this claim, Kant argues that no lies are justified no matter what the circumstance is. In my opinion, this argument is disagreeable because it has a very selfish point of view considering he wouldn't tell even one lie to protect someone from danger or even save their life. My argument speaks to this because Kant is claiming no life is worth a…
I think that Kant’s views should be the basics of ethics. Based on the definition of ethics being universal, Kant’s views can be applied to everyone. It does not matter what a person’s ethnicity, nationality, religion, or time period he/she resides in, Kant’s views of a good will can be practiced by everyone. Rather than happiness, which is conditional and has consequences, the good will is good within itself. With the example of a pair of people shopping, person A tries on a variety of clothing. Person A asks person B if an outfit is flattering on him/her. If happiness was the base of ethics, person B may try to avoid making person A feel bad saying that an outfit looked bad if person A was happy about that outfit. Whereas based on the good…
Fraud is generally defined as an omission of a material fact or a misrepresentation of the truth, intended for personal gain or to cause loss to another party. The act of fraud is most commonly committed in order to deprive another of money, property, or a legal right. Fraud is considered criminal activity, and anyone who is affected by a fraudulent act has the ability to file a lawsuit to collect damages. J.C. Penny was accused of marking up the prices on their products and then discounting them to the original price in order to trick customers into thinking they were receiving heavy discounts and better deals. J.C. Penny committed this act for their own personal gain, and in doing so, they deprived their customers of money that they would…
Firstly, I believe Kant says that being truthful outweighs any other duties people have to themselves and to the entirety of humanity because he affirms it is morally wrong to damage the dignity of others. Kant argues that all people are born with an intrinsic worth, which he referred to as human dignity. The dignity is acquired from the fact that people are capable of making their own decisions. Kant said that to be human means that people have the power of free choice. However, he also said that to be ethical means to respect the dignity in other people. He believes that people should use their power of free choice to be ethical and protect the dignity of other people by not telling lies. Specifically, Kant’s view is if a people tell lies,…