Preview

What Is Juvenile Waiver Purpose

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Juvenile Waiver Purpose
Juvenile waiver purpose aims to fill many different voids and address challenges in our justice system, which can be observed even in the different ways juveniles may be waived into adult court. One of the first methods waiving juveniles to adult court is with judicial waiver offenses, in which the juvenile court judge’s personally transfer cases to adult courts in order to prevent persons who are usually repeat offender’s; from the special protections that juvenile court systems provide. This ensures that certain individuals will not have the leverage of other youthful offenders, and ideally aren’t allowed to use age protection laws to their aid any longer. Another way in which cases are transported is through statutory exclusions that are
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile and Adult Courts: a Comparative Analysis
    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Juvenile and Adult Courts: a Comparative Analysis

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Adult Court Recidivism Summary
    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page

    Adult Court Recidivism Summary

    The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention report evaluated a study of outcomes for juveniles prosecuted in adult court rather than in juvenile court and found that there were counter-deterrent effects of transfer laws. Trying Juveniles as Adults, supra . A summary of six studies found that there was greater overall recidivism for juveniles prosecuted in adult court than juveniles whose crimes “matched” in juvenile court. Id. Juveniles in adult court also recidivated sooner and more frequently. Id. These higher rates of recidivism can be attributed to a variety of reasons, including lack of access to rehabilitative resources in the adult corrections system, problems when housed with adult criminals, and direct and indirect effects…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile And Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis
    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Juvenile And Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis

    The adjudication process in which a juvenile is transferred to the adult court system can take place in several ways, according to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Transfer laws vary state to state; however, such transfers fall under three basic categories, the judicial waiver laws, prosecutorial discretion or concurrent laws, and statutory exclusion laws. Judicial waiver law is the most common transfer used and is done on a case-by-case basis (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2011). This transfer allows the juvenile case to be filed in juvenile court but is transferred to adult court with the approval of the juvenile judge. The prosecutorial discretion or concurrent law gives the prosecutor sole discretion on whether to file charges in juvenile or adult court. No hearings that take place with this process ( (OJJDP, 2011). The statutory exclusion law grants adult courts exclusive jurisdiction over classes of cases involving juvenile offenders. This law requires juvenile courts to waive jurisdiction cases that meet specific age/offense or prior record criteria (OJJDP,…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal
    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PSY328 final proposal

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile vs Adult Courts Essay Example
    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Juvenile vs Adult Courts Essay Example

    There are many differences in juvenile court and in adult court. In the juvenile justice system rehabilitation and treatment, in addition to community protection, are considered to be primary and viable goals. In criminal adult court rehabilitation is not considered a primary goal in the criminal justice system, which operates under the assumption that criminal sanctions should be proportional to the offense. Deterrence is seen as a successful outcome of punishment (Vermont Judiciary, 2004). Limitations are placed on public access to juvenile records because of the belief that juvenile offenders can be successfully rehabilitated, and to avoid their unnecessary stigmatization. Court proceedings may be confidential to…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Court Case Study
    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juvenile Court Case Study

    A judicial waiver occurs when a juvenile court judge transfers a case from juvenile to adult court in order to deny the juvenile the protections that juvenile jurisdictions provide. Statutory exclusion, are provisions in the law to exclude some offenses, such as first-degree murder, from juvenile court jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction is a legal provision, which allows the prosecutor to file a juvenile case in both juvenile and adult court because the offense and the age of the accused meet certain…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Waiver and Remand to Adult Court
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial Waiver and Remand to Adult Court

    Using a judicial waiver allows the juvenile court judge to pass the case over to the subsequent federal or state adult court. This is normally done after the judge conducts a hearing that establishes if the juvenile can be treated or if the juvenile is a "threat to society." The use of judicial waivers are often governed by the state or federal legislative body, unfortunately, this means that at times the law is based on a presumption that may not have a factual basis. In many cases regardless of current condition a juvenile may be rehabilitated much easier than the initial hearing will determine. Unfortunately, the law may not allow additional chances at showing if the case, which in turn means the juvenile, may end in adult court when the juveniles could have been treated through juvenile court…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Justice Outline
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juvenile Justice Outline

    b. Delinquency and Detention – “Harsh conditions and over-crowding in detention facilities lead to increased reports of suicide attempts, stress-related illnesses, and psychiatric problems.” (National Juvenile Detention Association and Youth Law Center, 1998)…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Incarceration: Uncertainties In The Criminal Justice System
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juvenile Incarceration: Uncertainties In The Criminal Justice System

    Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Juvenile Justice System
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Juvenile Justice System

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Court Case
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juvenile Court Case

    Such statutes have had an incredible impact on the U.S. juvenile justice system. The original purpose of creating a separate juvenile court was to keep adolescents out of adult prisons, limit their exposure to adult criminal activity and poor role models, and also to provide guidance that helps them to turn away from further criminal behavior and be directed toward more positive results. It seemed that the individual juvenile offender cases were not getting looked at based on the individual characteristics or needs of the offender, rather whomever prosecuted the case was determining it based on the nature of the offense. Because of this, there were greater numbers of juvenile offenders having their cases in adult criminal courts, which do not…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults
    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Sentencing Research Paper
    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juvenile Sentencing Research Paper

    In recent studies states with high statistics in unemployment, substantial discretion by the prosecutor, and a high rate of African American incarceration are “the states most likely to pass blended sentencing provisions.” (Shaffer, 2016) This type of sentencing allows juvenile courts to impose adult criminal sanctions when certain categories are present. When this type of sentencing is in use it imposes a sentence that blends a juvenile disposition and an adult sentence, however, it is generally for certain serious youth offenders. Only some states allow this type of sentencing. When imposed there must be detailed descriptions of all procedures, standards, burdens of proof, and threshold offense and minimum age requirements are provided. Because blended sentence emerged when there was great need for a response to youth violence, much debate has surrounded this type of sentencing. These debates were because blended sentencing not only increased the number of youth that were transfer-eligible; it also shifted the power from judges and probation staff to prosecutors via the law of direct transfer. Direct file transfer is what is historically a judicial waiver. With this type of transfer, a juvenile judge issues a waiver to the young adult to an adult system. Another way to say this is, the juvenile court is the original court of jurisdiction and a judge in that division decides whether to retain the case in their court system or send the case to adult court for processing. Generally, with these decisions judges send the more serious cases or cases that have extensive prior record, both case types suggest that the defendant is not open to any treatments offered by the juvenile…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles Vs Adult Offenders
    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juveniles Vs Adult Offenders

    In contemporary society, there is a debate over whether a separate justice system should exist for juveniles and adults. While some juveniles have demonstrated the need for a separate justice system for juveniles, others have proven otherwise. There are separate justice systems for juvenile and adult offenders because of the belief that the mind of juveniles can be reformed unlike adult offenders. However, the juvenile justice system is similar to the adult justice system in many ways. In terms of the rights of the offenders, both juvenile and adult offenders have the right to an attorney, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, the right to protection against self-incrimination, the right to notice of charges, and prosecution needs proof beyond a reasonable doubt…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice Act
    • 6506 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Juvenile Justice Act

    Punishment was the central criminal law philosophy in English common law. A conclusive presumption that children under seven could not form criminal intent eliminated the youngest from the criminal justice system. Children between the ages of seven and fourteen were presumed incompetent to form the requisite criminal intent; the prosecutor, however, could rebut that presumption by demonstrating that the child knew the difference between right and wrong. Children over age fourteen were presumed to have the capacity to form criminal intent. There were no special courts for children, and they were treated as adult criminals. Minors were arrested, held in custody, and tried and sentenced by a court that had discretion to order the child imprisoned in the same jail as adult criminals. Although children received the same punishment as adults, they were not provided with many of the due process protections accorded adult criminals. For instance, minors did not have a right to "bail, indictment by grand jury, [and] right to a public trial."…

    • 6506 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics