Preview

What Influence A Judge's Sentencing Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
160 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Influence A Judge's Sentencing Analysis
The general factors that influence a judge's sentencing decisions are statutory provisions, philosophical rationales, organizational considerations, presentence investigation reports. Judge are free to tailor fit a punishment for a sentence within its limit. A judge can order the offender to pay restitution to the victim, survivors, or a community for injury inflicted. The offender can attain credits from jail time while waiting for trial and deduct it from their prison sentence. There can be a suspended imprisonment granted. Also, a "time served" can be render by the judge, in which the offender can be released. If an offender is convicted of two or more prison sentences a judge can arrange the sentences to run together or separate time.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anatomy Of A Verdict Analysis
    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anatomy Of A Verdict Analysis

    D. Graham Burnette gave fantastic insight into the logistics and feelings of a jury sentencing in his article, Anatomy of a Verdict. Throughout the article he explained just how hard it can be for a jury to sentence someone for a large crime. As he stated, a jury is something akin to, “foot soldiers of justice” (Burnette 2001), which conjures up the image of brave people going off to take on a daunting duty. In many ways, that’s exactly what it is for a real jury, no matter what the case. It can be emotionally, and sometimes physically draining to sit in a deliberations room for hours at a time, discussing at length a fellow human beings future.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing Research Paper
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indeterminate Sentencing Research Paper

    Determinate sentencing can take two forms: legislatively determined or judicially determined. In either case, the offender is sentenced to a specific term of incarceration. He or she is released at the expiration of the term, minus good time credits if they are available. There is no discretionary parole release, although there may be a period of supervision in the community. Under a legislatively determined structure, the legislature fixes by law the penalty for specific offenses or offense categories. In a judicially determined system, the judge has broad discretion to choose a sanction, but, once…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Emphasis on Diversity in the Judiciary Is Unnecessary. the Culture of Any Judiciary Is by Nature Conservative and There Is No Evidence That an Unrepresentative Judiciary Would or Do Come to Different Decisions Than
    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Emphasis on Diversity in the Judiciary Is Unnecessary. the Culture of Any Judiciary Is by Nature Conservative and There Is No Evidence That an Unrepresentative Judiciary Would or Do Come to Different Decisions Than

    Judges play many roles. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. We have what is known as an adversarial system of justice - legal cases are contests between opposing sides, which ensures that evidence and legal arguments will be fully and forcefully presented. The judge, however, remains above the fray, providing an independent and impartial assessment of the facts and how the law applies to those facts. If the defendant is convicted of a crime, the judge passes sentence.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Model Of Indeterminate Sentencing
    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Model Of Indeterminate Sentencing

    Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing Analysis
    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page

    Indeterminate Sentencing Analysis

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing Model
    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Determinate Sentencing Model

    Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing Structure
    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indeterminate Sentencing Structure

    Judges in the United States used indeterminate sentencing for nearly 45 years. This type of sentencing has a set limit of incarceration that a convict may serve for the crime committed. If the judge gives an offender two to five years imprisonment, then that offender will serve a minimum of two years but will serve no more than five years. This system was put into place to make the offender in their release with good behavior in prison.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Role Of A Judge In The Criminal Justice Process
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of A Judge In The Criminal Justice Process

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing Proposal

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    The sentence imposed typically included incarceration, probation, and fines. Under this scheme, a judge typically will impose a sentencing range rather than a specific time, allowing a parole board to decide when to release the offender. An example of this is when an offender is convicted of homicide and is sentenced to twenty-five years to life. The offender understands that he or she will spend the minimum time of twenty-five years incarcerated but may be required to serve a sentence of up to a maximum of life. The actual amount of time spent after the twenty-five years will depend on the conduct and success in the rehabilitative process of the offender during his or her time…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Importance Of Equity In Sentencing
    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Importance Of Equity In Sentencing

    Equity is defined as the sentencing principle that similar crimes and similar criminals should be treated alike. (Frank Schmalleger, 2007)Equity in sentencing has been an issue for quite a while. It has sparked heated discussions in the U.S. Congress, as well as arguments among community members. Supporters of equity in sentencing try to inspire changes to our current legislation, and its opponents are attempting to abolish it in its entirety.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies
    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophies

    The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics