What holds Societies together?
Lenski: members of a society are united by a shared culture, although cultural patterns become more diverse as a society gains more complex technology. As technology becomes more complex, inequality divides a society more and more, although industrialization reduces inequality somewhat.
Marx: not unity but socially divided based on class position. From his point of view, elites may force an uneasy peace, but true social unity can occur only if production becomes a cooperative process.
Weber: the members of a society share a worldview. Just as tradition joined people together in the preindustrial societies, so modern societies have created rational, large-scale organizations that connect people’s lives, bureaucracies take on a key role
Durkheim: Solidarity. he contrasted the mechanical solidarity of preindustrial societies, which is based on shared morality, with modern society’s organic solidarity, which is based on specialization.
How do Societies change?
Lenski: through technological innovation; sociocultural evolution that over time transforms an entire society. Societies differ mostly in terms of changing technology. Modern society stands out from past societies in terms of its enormous productive power.
Marx: historical differences in productivity (mode of production), with continuing social conflict (except simple hunters and gatherers). Modern society is distinctive mostly because it brings that conflict (class struggle) out into the open. He highlights the struggle between classes as the engine of change,
Weber: ideas contribute to social change. Members of preindustrial societies have a traditional outlook; modern people take a rational worldview. A particular worldview—Calvinism—set in motion the Industrial Revolution, which ended up reshaping all of society.
Durkheim: an expanding division of labor as the key dimension of social change. Traditional societies are characterized by mechanical solidarity based on moral likeness; modern industrial societies based on organic solidarity characterized by the productive specialization.
Where are the societies headed?
Lenski: Greater specialized people processing information
Marx: class conflict pushing societies toward revolution; socialism. Capitalism would generate the seeds of its own destruction.
Weber: iron cage, with growing rationality creating an ever spreading «disenchantment» with the world.
Durkheim: new forms of associations would bind highly differentiated people together and resolve anomie
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
One of Durkheim’s major works was a Book called ‘The division of labor in society’. This is known as one of his most famous books, as it includes some key elements of his sociological thoughts. In this book, Durkheim wrote about the differences within traditional and modern societies. He describes traditional societies as having a low division of labor in society- resulting in mechanical solidarity. This is a term that Durkheim used to explain small compact and quite simple societies such as small rural villages, where there was a strong…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who felt that modernization occurred because of an increase in “specialized economic activity” (Macionis, 2006). His theory suggests that in years past, the traditional members of society all shared the same activities. Tasks such as farming, fishing, and cooking, gathering wood and gathering water were many of the shared activities of a community in the past centuries.…
- 1155 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Durkheim lived from 1858 – 1917, and was a key actor both in the foundation of sociology, social science and, as is contextually synonymous, in the…
- 1696 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Karl Marx shocked the world with his own publication, The Manifesto in 1848, which sharply contradicted the visions of Smith and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution (Heilbroner, 1999). Marx concepts of unification without social class for the good of all people were communicated and the birth of communism was realized. Unlike Smith, who believed that the division of labor increased productivity, Marx believed that labor becomes a commodity and power rested in the hands of those who controlled production (Armor, 1997). Marx believed that the pending Industrial Revolution would create havoc and confusion to the capitalists' society…
- 1263 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…
- 1048 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
| French sociologist Emile Durkheim observed that rapid social change and a more specialized division of labor produce strain in society; these strains lead to a breakdown in traditional organization, values, and authority and to a dramatic increase in:…
- 2095 Words
- 9 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Sociology arose through the massive changes we call modernization. What other examples can you identify where social change (large or small) has prompted people to think about their world in a different way?…
- 2582 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
The three major sociological perspectives, functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism, are perception lenses which Sociologists utilize to answer the two basic questions in building theory; what issues should we study? And how should the facts be linked? Essentially, each perspective conceptualizes and analyzes how society influences people as well as how people can influence society. Functionalism or structural-functionalism is sociological perspective that analyzes society on a macro level.…
- 641 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
David Emile Durkheim was a French theorist who wanted to create an ideal of sociology based on the idea that society is an unbiased and limiting material reality, independent to the individual. According to Durkheim, the division of labor is basically a significant source of social solidarity dating back to the foundation of life that links together and affects civil, economic, educational, and legal processes. This new…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Marx posited that there are two main classes in any capitalist society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and that the two classes are defined by their relationship to resources specifically the means of production. The bourgeoisie own and control the means of production. Therefore, they have a high, economically powerful position in society. The proletariat or workers class can only subsist by offering their labor to the upper class. This division between the classes is what drives class conflict.…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Marx advocated social reform for the proletariat (workers).The focus of Marx’s conflict theory is that by eliminating privilege, the overall welfare of the society can be increased. This would then create a true equality amongst members of a society. He argues that privileged groups are working to maintain their privileges, while the disadvantaged are constantly trying to attain more. The owners are making all the profit while the workers are, basically, trading their labor for bare necessities like food, shelter and clothing.…
- 827 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Thus we can readily see that while both Marx and Durkheim take a structural approach to society, Durkheim basis his theories of class, race, and gender based on consensus, whereas Marx basis his theories of class, race, and gender on conflict. Both theorists are also comparable when it comes to the underlying determinism of their theories. Both believed that social change is inevitable and needs to occur. Both also focused on industrialization in order to assess social change. While both Marx and Durkheim believed that social change was progressive, Marx' ultimate society would be a communist classless society while Durkheim's would be a complete society based on organic solidarity. While Marx called for an end of social inequality through…
- 183 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
It is one component in which all three canons agree on. Marx views social classes as having an essential role in societal dominance and control (Nakhaie 2016: Feb 2). He argues that one group exploits and takes advantage of another group. The design of the product and how it is produced are determined, not by the producers who make it, nor by the consumers of the product, but by the Capitalist class (Nakhaie 2016: Feb 2). Marx (Bratton and Denham 2014: 120) also argued that the dominant class creates a belief of a way of life that, in turn, leads to its domination. Similarly, he claims that the class holding the means of production also controls the intellectual production of people in its society (Bratton and Denham 2014: 121). Further, Marx (Bratton and Denham 2014: 136) states that the dominant class controls the demand of the market in terms of what is being produced as well as how much and, as a result, controls society. Émile Durkheim shared Karl Marx belief on divisions of labour; however, in a different light. Durkheim views divisions of labour as the source of social solidarity (Bratton and Denham 2014: 163). In other words, his thoughts on the division of labour stem from a moral perspective which emphasizes an interaction between people that results in social order (Bratton and Denham 2014:…
- 1207 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays