Preview

What Effect Did Lenin Have On The People Of Russia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
391 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Effect Did Lenin Have On The People Of Russia
In 1917 the Bolsheviks took power and Russia’s economy was going to collapse mainly due to involvement in the Civil War and World War One. Lenin implemented War Communism in order that the nationalisation of the whole country could take place. The broad aims of Lenin’s communism were to redistribute wealth among the Russian people and to support the Red Army with artillery and weapons. Lenin did not achieve his goals to establish communism in Russia. The agricultural and industrial sectors in Russian collapsed due to the unorganised nationalisation that took place. Communism also had bad social effects on the people of Russia. Although the Russian economy was going through a crisis, Lenin was still able to support and help the Red army to win
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?
    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Far Do You Agree That The Status Of Workers In Russia From 1855-1964
    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Far Do You Agree That The Status Of Workers In Russia From 1855-1964

    He fuelled a period of massive industrialisation which ultimately lead to the emergence of a new social group; the urban proletariat. This group, who had little status in Russian society in the period 1854-1894, now played a major role in Russia, meaning a change in an average workers status. By 1914, there were 2.9 million workers employed in Russia working in 24,900 factories. However, this period comes with a degree of continuity in the level of status of workers; in 1910 only half of Russia’s national productivity was industrial. This points in the general direction that, as with the reigns of Alexander the II and III, the peasants were the social class with more power. The provisional government of February 1917 marked a change for the status of workers in Russia. It was formed with the Petrograd soviet, a council of workers and soldiers. They controlled the railway, postal and telegraph services; a level of status in which workers had previously never held. During Lenin’s rule, there were varying degrees of workers status: ‘While the peasantry suffered between 1918 and 1921, the urban workers became better off…The NEP clearly benefited the peasantry at the expense of urban workers’1. This quote from Lee can be challenged, as during war communism 1918 the populations of Moscow dropped by half. This shows that workers…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    how far was ww1 responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs?
    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages

    how far was ww1 responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs?

    By 1917, the Russian economy was in poor shape and near complete destruction because of the war effort. Food shortages were rampant which brought about civil unrest.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Transformation of Russia (2/14/13)
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Transformation of Russia (2/14/13)

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq
    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    There were many consequences from the Bolshevik revolution. Farmland was distributed among farmers, and factories are given to workers. The banks were nationalized and a national council was assembled to run the economy. Russia pulled out of World War I, signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, conceding lots of land to Germany. Civil war, between Bolshevik (“red”) and anti-Bolshevik (“white”) forces, sweeps Russia from 1918 to 1920. Around 15 million die in conflict and the famine. The Russian economy is in shambles. Industrial production drops, trade all but ceases, and skilled workers flee the country. Despite the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes
    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ss notes

    o Trans-Siberian Railroad o Foreign investment o “exhaustion at the base” 1894-1917 nicholas ii 1898 founding of Marxist Russian social democratic labor party marxists who favored proletariat, working class 1900 international financial crisis 1902 founding of socialist revolutionary party anti marxist, and anti capitalist favored peasants and violence 1903 mensheviks and bolsheviks arose bolsheviks wanted revolution ASAP mensheviks were pro waiting 1903 massive wave of strikes 1904 russia goes to war with japan Russia failed and this caused privitization and additional hardship 1905 bloody Sunday: led to mass distress in country father gapon October manifesto: granted civil liberties to Russian people and the establishment of parliament 1906 first duma: lower chamber of Russian parliament 1906-1911 stolypin assassinated A. Stolypin believed that by abolishing the peasant commune, they would be more productive B. Kulaks: new peasant class, upper class peasants, had more money and were more intelligent C. Stop division of land; title of land goes to families o Redistribute land so peasants get plot…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did World War 1 Affect Europe
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did World War 1 Affect Europe

    Russia’s economy suffered worse during the war than most of the other participants due to its underdeveloped Industrial sector. Eventually, the toll on the Russian economy and quality of life caused the Russian people to rebel against Czar Nicholas II and a revolution took place in 1917. When Vladimir Lenin of the Bolsheviks came to power, he withdrew Russia from the war in order to begin ameliorating working conditions and quality of life, but before he could begin stabilizing the economic and political climate in Russia, a Civil War broke out. Ultimately, the Bolshevik regime won the war and Russia emerged as the Soviet Union: the first communist country in…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Post World War 1 And 2 On Russia
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Post World War 1 And 2 On Russia

    In February 1917, there was a mass rebellion lead by woman and workers that created the end of the tsar and reign of the provisional government, which granted them equal rights (Roberts 257). Not too long after, in October, another revolution occurred in which Lenin and the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government. This revolution eventually lead to the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which ended Russia’s participation in WWI (Roberts 258). The signing of this lead to a huge downfall in the economy of Russia. They had lost land to Germany, including ¾ of their coal industry, their manufacturing output was down to 1/5 of what it had been pre-war, Europe had hit a period of starvation in the winter 1918 (Roberts 267), and in 1921…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lenin a Red Tsar?
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenin a Red Tsar?

    Lenin’s impact on Europe and Russia consisted of him applying Marxist ideas, which later led to complete Communism, and a threat to Europe and the rest of world. In developing his plan of socialism in Russia, Lenin followed the examples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the original developers of the communist theory. The main aspect of any kind of government, and especially socialism, is its economic structure. Lenin explained that in his economic theory, called Imperialism, the first step was to gradually move into a joined monopoly - capitalist phase, which later would become communism.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Change in Russia
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Change in Russia

    The conditions in Russia after the upset were no superior to conditions some time recently. Deficiencies of nourishment and produced merchandise really expanded as generation diminished. Laborer ranchers were compelled to offer their yields to the legislature under Lenin's "war socialism" arrangement abandoning them with scarcely enough to survive. Workers soon lost motivation to develop more products or stored what they did develop. Workers who did this and were figured out were ousted, detained or executed. Mechanical yield really fell underneath the levels they had been at under the Tsar. Lenin distinguished this and expecting that the Russian individuals might rebel against him and the Bolsheviks, organized the New Economic Policy. It finished almost no assistance. Anybody voicing resistance or feedback of the way the Bolsheviks were running things was marked a counterrevolutionary and likewise banished, imprisoned or executed. All things considered, the predicament of the workers and workers deteriorated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Communist Manifesto And Marxism
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Communist Manifesto And Marxism

    The Soviet Union was a capitalist state that was damaged due to the lack of resources and necessities after World War I. Economically they were incapable to grow due to the poor leadership, mostly towards the middle class, with socialist ideals. The Bolsheviks were capable to sight the flaw and wanted to gain the power of the Soviet Union under the power of Lenin. Unfortunately the Bolsheviks were a socialist group during this upheaval leading to the failed attempt. Few social mobility was allowed after World War I, canceling the effects. The Soviet Union decided to populate the communism into the parties through socialism first, for it was much easier than capitalism to communism. Communism did not succeed due to not disrupting the power but they did allow the upper classed elite to have more power. This all shows how the USSRs communism differed from that of the ideals of Marx in the communist manifesto. The selfish upper class ruined the plan of distributing equality and resources, leading to the downfall of the supreme Soviet…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay
    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Commanding Heights Essay

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Economic Systems
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economic Systems

    Numerous and diverse economic systems have been established throughout the course of global history, impacting society in various ways. Many of these systems include manorialism, capitalism, communism, market economy, and many more. An economic system that has greatly influenced a specific region and its society is communism, established in Russia during the Russian Revolution. During and after World War I, Russia was in chaos due to the opposition of czarist rule, economic hardships, and other dissatisfactions of many. Due to these complications, Russians were pleading for economic and political changes. Communism in Russia immensely affected Russian society as some oppressed this regimen, while others benefited from it.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Social History
    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social History

    Social historians who intend to focus on understanding the root causes and motivations for the revolutions of 1917, look towards the actions and behaviour of normal, everyday people involved within the Revolution rather than the influence of great men and women, or the policies of a state. Social historians observe and comment on the fact that leading up to 1917, there was a widening and very apparent gap between the richest members of Russia society and the very poorest members. Rather than being typecast as the ignorant and stupid masses, many Russians from all different walks of life whether they were soldiers, peasants, factory workers, or homemakers developed their own consciousness and opinions as to what that the revolution meant for Russia, how they should function in a new society, how that society should be structured, and what it should look like. In contrast to what Bolshevik propaganda would have some of us believe, many Russians did not blindly follow or believe in demagogues like Trotsky or Lenin who were promising bread, circuses, and miracles for the suffering population. Instead, many developed their own opinions on what kind of regime should take power and represent Russia and what type of laws should govern the land. Due to the fact that the vast swarm of Russian society was what would be considered lower-class, the message of the Bolsheviks for a government and party to represent the lower-class was simply much more appealing than other parties at the time such as the liberals or the conservative factions in the government. Peace by the means of an end to the Russian involvement in the First World War, bread for the starving masses in the cities, and land to those who were disappointed by the lack of agricultural reform since the emancipation of 1861 were all promises that were much more appealing than the message of the provincial government. The…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics