Some aspects of science can be proven through concrete evidence, such as how cells function. We can put cells under a light or electron microscope and see how they function. We can test hypothesis, and find concrete answers through experimentation. For example, let us assume that a child does not know that plants need light to survive. But when the child puts a plant in his or her closet and the plant dies they then have gained the knowledge that plants cannot live without sunlight. This gives them concrete evidence that they can use to “explain” to their friends that plants need light to survive. So some of the explanations of science can not be argued, but what about controversial topics such as the origin of the universe? Some scientist argue the universe started with the Big Bang, whereas others people argue that God created the world in seven days. Although the latter theory is losing traction with public opinion, there is no way to absolutely prove that either theory is correct. And although both opinions have their supposed evidence, (the Big Bang is supported by radio waves, and the God theory is supported by the Bible,) but there is still no absolute way to prove that God exist, or that all of the “something” that surrounds us all came from “nothing.” Therefore, scientist can use the scientific method to provide concrete explanations to problems and questions, but they can not explain everything using commonly accepted knowledge. Some of the theories, such as how the universe was created, can only be explained through personal
Some aspects of science can be proven through concrete evidence, such as how cells function. We can put cells under a light or electron microscope and see how they function. We can test hypothesis, and find concrete answers through experimentation. For example, let us assume that a child does not know that plants need light to survive. But when the child puts a plant in his or her closet and the plant dies they then have gained the knowledge that plants cannot live without sunlight. This gives them concrete evidence that they can use to “explain” to their friends that plants need light to survive. So some of the explanations of science can not be argued, but what about controversial topics such as the origin of the universe? Some scientist argue the universe started with the Big Bang, whereas others people argue that God created the world in seven days. Although the latter theory is losing traction with public opinion, there is no way to absolutely prove that either theory is correct. And although both opinions have their supposed evidence, (the Big Bang is supported by radio waves, and the God theory is supported by the Bible,) but there is still no absolute way to prove that God exist, or that all of the “something” that surrounds us all came from “nothing.” Therefore, scientist can use the scientific method to provide concrete explanations to problems and questions, but they can not explain everything using commonly accepted knowledge. Some of the theories, such as how the universe was created, can only be explained through personal